On May 31, 2019 a
Answer Filed - Answer to 2nd Cross-Complaint
was filed
involving a dispute between
Juarez Alvarez, Yolanda,
and
Bessemer Trust Company, N.A.,
City Of Fontana,
Does 1 Through 100,
Does 5 Through 100, Inclusive,
Hunt Enterprises, Inc.,
Hunt, Priscilla,
Hunt Priscilla Living Trust,
for Complaint for Damages Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
DANIEL S. ALDERMAN g;
L E a
State Bar No. 124 33 1
Sligfiifirfifi CALiFOHNm
Ix.)
ALLISON R. HILGERS~ ESQ- Eggmgg
”aAm'Es:2“.mrx‘JAEv-‘iairitiigréflrfigfifl
‘
BarNo: 228862
‘
State
ALDERMAN & HILGERS, LLP v
1150 S. Olive Street. Suite I800
AUG 15 2023
L05 Angeles, CA 90015 K g .
" "
Telephone: (213) 992-8206
. .
Facsnmlle: (213) 992-3272
mm ,
c211- gun;
BY: PAOLA iNIzUE Deputv
Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF FONTANA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
ll YOLANDA JUAREZ ALVAREZ~ an ) CASE NO.: CIVDS 1916334
individual, )
) ANSWER T0 CROSS-COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, )
)
v.
)
)
HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST; CITY OF )
FONTANA, et a|., Date Action Filed: May 31, 2019
Trial Date: 1 1/26/23
Defendants,
And
JUAN HERNANDEZ,
Nominal Defendant.
PRISCILLA HUNT and BESSEMER TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., as Co-Trustees ofthe
Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; and HUNT VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cross-Complainants,
v.
CITY OF FONTANA, a California Municipal
entity; and MOES 1-25, Inclusive,
Cross—Defendants.
27 ///
28 ///
l
ANSWER ’T’O’Eébss-COMPLNNT
Ix)
Cross-defendam, CITY OF FONTANA, in answer t0 cross-complainam PRISCILLA
HUNT, as Co-Trustee ofthe Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY,
N.A., as Co—Trustee 0fthe Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; and HUNT ENTERPRISES. INC. cross-
complaint herein, admits, denies and alleges as follows:
l. Under the provisions ofSeclion 431.30 thhe California Code (gf‘CiW'l Procedure,
this answering cross-defendant denies each, every and all allegations in said unverified cross-
complaint, and the whole thereof, and denies that cross-complainants sustained damages in the sum
0r sums alleged, in any other sum, or at all.
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
2. Cross-complainant’s cross-complaint fails t0 state facts sufficient 10 constitute a cause 0f
action against this answering cross-defendant.
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
3. Cross-complainants were careless and negligent in and about the matters alleged in the
second amended complaint. Said carelessness and negligence 0n Cross—Complainams' part
proximately contributed t0 the occurrence OfIhe incident and 10 the injuries. loss. and damages
complained thereof, ifthere were any. Accordingly, Cross-complainams‘ right t0 recover damages
is correspondingly barred 0r proportionately reduced.
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
24 4. Plaintiffand/or Plaintiff‘s decedent, with full knowledge OfIhe consequences this/her
25 acts. and with full knowledge OfIhe dangers incident thereto. was voluntarily exposed Io all 0fthe
26 matters and things alleged in the second amended complaint and did thereby assume the risk
27
generally incident thereto.
28
’7
ANSWEETEER OSS-COM PLWA [?\Y'T
Document Filed Date
August 15, 2023
Case Filing Date
May 31, 2019
Category
Complaint for Damages Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DANIEL S. ALDERMAN g; L E a State Bar No. 124 33 1 Sligfiifirfifi CALiFOHNm Ix.) ALLISON R. HILGERS~ ESQ- Eggmgg ”aAm'Es:2“.mrx‘JAEv-‘iairitiigréflrfigfifl ‘ BarNo: 228862 ‘ State ALDERMAN & HILGERS, LLP v 1150 S. Olive Street. Suite I800 AUG 15 2023 L05 Angeles, CA 90015 K g . " " Telephone: (213) 992-8206 . . Facsnmlle: (213) 992-3272 mm , c211- gun; BY: PAOLA iNIzUE Deputv Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF FONTANA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 ll YOLANDA JUAREZ ALVAREZ~ an ) CASE NO.: CIVDS 1916334 individual, ) ) ANSWER T0 CROSS-COMPLAINT Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST; CITY OF ) FONTANA, et a|., Date Action Filed: May 31, 2019 Trial Date: 1 1/26/23 Defendants, And JUAN HERNANDEZ, Nominal Defendant. PRISCILLA HUNT and BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Co-Trustees ofthe Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; and HUNT VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ENTERPRISES, INC. Cross-Complainants, v. CITY OF FONTANA, a California Municipal entity; and MOES 1-25, Inclusive, Cross—Defendants. 27 /// 28 /// l ANSWER ’T’O’Eébss-COMPLNNT Ix) Cross-defendam, CITY OF FONTANA, in answer t0 cross-complainam PRISCILLA HUNT, as Co-Trustee ofthe Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Co—Trustee 0fthe Donald G. Hunt Living Trust; and HUNT ENTERPRISES. INC. cross- complaint herein, admits, denies and alleges as follows: l. Under the provisions ofSeclion 431.30 thhe California Code (gf‘CiW'l Procedure, this answering cross-defendant denies each, every and all allegations in said unverified cross- complaint, and the whole thereof, and denies that cross-complainants sustained damages in the sum 0r sums alleged, in any other sum, or at all. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 2. Cross-complainant’s cross-complaint fails t0 state facts sufficient 10 constitute a cause 0f action against this answering cross-defendant. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 3. Cross-complainants were careless and negligent in and about the matters alleged in the second amended complaint. Said carelessness and negligence 0n Cross—Complainams' part proximately contributed t0 the occurrence OfIhe incident and 10 the injuries. loss. and damages complained thereof, ifthere were any. Accordingly, Cross-complainams‘ right t0 recover damages is correspondingly barred 0r proportionately reduced. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 24 4. Plaintiffand/or Plaintiff‘s decedent, with full knowledge OfIhe consequences this/her 25 acts. and with full knowledge OfIhe dangers incident thereto. was voluntarily exposed Io all 0fthe 26 matters and things alleged in the second amended complaint and did thereby assume the risk 27 generally incident thereto. 28 ’7 ANSWEETEER OSS-COM PLWA [?\Y'T