On February 26, 2019 a Answer was filed involving a dispute between Torres, Christopher, Torres, Melissa, and Barnes Group Inc., As Successor By Acquisition Of Kar Products, Inc., A, Barnes Group Inc. As Successor By Acquisition Of Kar Products,Llc, B C Stocking Distributing, A California Corporation, B'Laster Llc, Chevron Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Crc Industries, Inc. Which Will Do Businessin California As Pennsylvania Crc Industrie, Dap Products Inc., A Delaware Corporation, Does 3-100, Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc., A Delaware Corporation, Kern Oil & Refining Co., A California Corporation, Lighthouse For The Blind, Midwest Motor Supply Co., An Ohio Corporation, Nch Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Oatey Co., An Ohio Corporation, Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, Petro Source Investments, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, Ppg Industries, Inc. A Pennsylvania Corporation, P-T Technologies, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Quaker State Corporation, As Successor By Acquistion Of Westland Oil Company, Inc., A, Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc., A Wisconsin Corporation, Union Oil Company Of California, A California Corporation, Wd-40 Company, A Delaware Corporation, for Product Liability Unlimited in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
f r 1 I J snn I evin S i r 10 161 7 iennifer nnevi l ts ar Alg 243685 2 Nicr 1 I iarrison tat ar ItT 2876 9 TEI T l E JO Ti C Nt 1 L U D 3 fi33 Vtrest Fi h Stre t Suzte 190Q t0 COUR7 OF CALIFORNIA Lns Angeles Ii t tli 9007 c RN UM1iBERNARDiNO TI OF Sf1N BERNARDINp 4 T lephone 21 439 9400 DISTRICT 5 acsimile 213 ile in ste atti 39 95 9 MAR I 0 202Q ti jb ann vill c st ptcc rn s 6 nt risa Y stepta ar n AOt u uN MA IiVE ti PU Attnrney for Defendants CHEVRON U S A INC and U1 IIf N 8 C IL COIV1 A 1Y F CAZT aRIt1I 9 SL ERIt R COtJRT E r THE STATE OF CALIFC RNIA 14 Ff7R THE COUNfi1 QF SAN B ItNARDINO lI Case No CT DS1 5492 IIRiS T 7PHER TORRES and ME ISSA 2 TORR ES Ct mplaint iled Fe6ruary 6 2019 I laintiffs 1 Re Assignec 101he f or Brycan F Fas er vs D artment S22 14 BARNES GRQUP I 1C etai 1S DEF irCDANTS CI EVRON U S A INC S Defendax ts DQE l ANSW R T4 P AINT FFS 7 16 C DIVIPLAINT 17 3S i y o 21 Defendant CHEVR N U S A INC named as Doe 1 De endant fvr itself and for n f other defendants and in answer to Plaintiffs CHRISTC PHER TORRES and MELISSA T 7RRES 23 arriplaint Camplaint ans vers denies and alleges as follaws 24 11 5 tll z f i 2 r a t t IIEFENDANT CHEVRUIV U S A INC S I OE 1 ANSW TQ PLAINTIFFS v1PI IN I 1 GENEI I T1E tIAL 2 1 D efendant enerally denies each and every allegatign of the Complaint it t u 3 limiting the faregoin 17efendani further denies that it is Iiable to Plaintiffs in any particul 4 in the alleged omplaint c r in any other particular or at all and further deny tihat T laintiffs hav 5 be n damaged in the particulars alle d in th Cc rrtplain r in any other particular ar t ait 6 D fcndant ail es th fallowing a flirjnativ efenses on iz formatian and belief 7 FIRS I i FIRIL IATI t DEFENSE Each purparted cause f acti n in tlie CompIaint is bar3rec by a r ap licable s1 tu 9 flimitation incl din but nc t limiied to Californra Code oFGivil Procedure sections 35 1 33 lf a b and d 9 3 0 8 3 5 1 anc 43 11 CClkV Ll A IRd ATIVE DE F N E l2 3 P1 ii f Christopher Trarres Tarres lack of re zsanat le care fo his safety ri 13 vell being was t e sol cause of ar contributecf to his injuries and damages as alle ed in ih 14 Complaint By xeasr n thereof Plaintiffs are barred from recc verin aIl or fihat portion of art 15 damage attributablc to Toz es fault antl vr l c of r asonabl car 15 THII IJ A I lV1 TIVE DEFENSE 7 Plain iffs d iF any ie ally ag s were caused x cantributed to by Torres 18 unfores eabl idibsyn r tiG cvz di ions unusuat susceptibi ty ar hypersensitive reaction 19 which Defenriant is not iiable 20 FCiURTI C AF I t TTVE DEFENS 2I S Defendartt reby inv kes th provisions t f Califr rnia Cade of Civil Prt c z ur 22 section I 431 2 a Propasition 51 and seeks ta alIa ate its respective liabif ity ifarxy for Pl intiffs 23 d ma es if a y among those oiher person ar entitics whose acts or ottaissions le ally caused i 24 cc ntributed to Plai ntif s dama es if y 25 FIFTH AFFIRMA T 4 E A FNSF 26 6 Each purportedc use ofacti n in the Camplaint is arred by tMe et uit ble do irin 27 of laches waiver estQppel and corz tparative negligence t1 I FENb I T Cl i VR NC A T l S I30E I NSWER Tfl PLAINTI FS GC MPLAINT