On April 26, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ching Fen Huang,
Hsi Keng Huang,
Hsi Keng Huang,
Sz Hua Huang,
Sz Hua Huang,
Wei Lun Huang,
Trinity Huang,
Tristan Huang,
and
Tesla Inc.,
Tesla, Inc.,
The State Of California, Department Of Transportation,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited (23)
in the District Court of Santa Clara County.
Preview
1 ERIN E. HOLBROOK, Chief Counsel
G. MICHAEL HARRINGTON, Deputy Chief Counsel
2 LANDA LOW, Assistant Chief Attorney (SBN 125121)
ROSEMARY LOVE, Deputy Attorney (SBN 257907)
3 111 Grand Avenue, Suite 11-100, kland, CA 94612
Mail: P.O. Box 24325, Oakland, California 94623
4
Telephone: (510) 433-9100, Fax: (510) 433-9167
Attorneys for Defendant STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
acting by and through the Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”)
5
6
r
7
8
SUPERIOR COURT OFTHE STAT E OF CALIFORNIA
9
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
0
SZ HUA HUANG, Individually and as Case No. 19CV346663
successor in interest to WEI LUN HUANG,
deceased; TRINITY HUANG, a minor;
TRISTAN HUANG, a minor; HSI KENG DECLARATION OF ROSEMARY LOVE
3
HUANG; and CHING FENHUANG, IN SUPPORT OF CALTRANS’ REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTIONTO
Plaintiffs, AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS
INFORMATION
5
vs. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2034.610, 2034.620)
6
TESLA INC. dba TESLA MOTORS, INC., ate: November 7, 2023
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and Does Time: 9:00 a.m.
1 through 100, cation: Dept. 6
Defendants.
Complaint Filed: April 2
Trial Date: March , 202
I, ROSEMARY LOVE, declare as follows:
I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the State oCalifornia and in this
Court, and I make this declaration in support of the Caltrans’ Motion to Augment Expert Witness
Information.
I am employed by the State of California, Department of Transportation, Legal
Division, and am one of the attorneys representing the Department in this action. I have personal
knowledge of the facts set forth below based upon my role as an attorney in this matter, and if called,
7
could testify to the facts stated inthis Declar ation.
1
DECLARATION OF ROSEMARY LOVE IN SUPPORT OF CALTRANS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2034.610, 2034.620)
1 The parties spent over ten hourstak ing e deposition of Caltrans’ accident
2 reconstruction expert Stephen Fenton on August 14, 2023 in order to elicit his opinions, which
3 included the sequenceand severity of the cras after impact with the attenuator.
4 Plaintiff biomechanic engin Mark Shattuck was deposed on August 28, 2023
5 and discussed his opinions about the likelihood of the fatal injury occurring in the first impact with
6 the attenuator, as opposed to the second impact with the Mazda. A true and correct excerpt of Mar
7 Shattuck’s deposition is attached hereto as Exhibit L 92:20-93:1)
8 ake this declaration based upon my personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. If
9 called as a witness in this case, I could and would testify competently as set forth herein. I certify,
0 under penalty of perjury, under the laws of th tate of California, that the foregoing is true
and correct and that this declaration was executed in Oakland, California on the 31st day of October,
2023.
3 ROSEMARY LOVE
5
6
7
2
DECLARATION OF ROSEMARY LOVE IN SUPPORT OF CALTRANS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2034.610, 2034.620)
MARK SHATTUCK, PH.D. August 28, 2023
SZ HUA HUANG vs TESLA, INC. 1
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
MARK SHATTUCK, PH.D. August 28, 2023
SZ HUA HUANG vs TESLA, INC. 92
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
MARK SHATTUCK, PH.D. August 28, 2023
SZ HUA HUANG vs TESLA, INC. 93
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f