arrow left
arrow right
  • Novalk, LLC -v- Cirit et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Novalk, LLC -v- Cirit et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Novalk, LLC -v- Cirit et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • Novalk, LLC -v- Cirit et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

(ENDORSED) CASE ATTACHMENT COVER PAGE ELECTRONICALLY FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STREET ADDRESS;247 West Third Street BY SUPERIOR COURT MAILING ADDRESS: San Bernardino, CA 92415 OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CITY AND zlp CODE; BRANCH NAME:San Bernardino Justice Center San Bernatdino WEBSITE:http: //www. sb-court org . on Jul 6, 2022 CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Separate Statement (NC Queen) ATTACHMENTNAME: Exhibit: Deputy Clerk: MeJa/ee Gay Novalk, LLC vs. Semih Cirit, et al. CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME; CIVSB2122277 Please log on to www.TurboCourt.com regularly for updates Please staple this to your original attachment q 'unoaoqmu/:du [Luca Michelangelo Tatone (SBN: 290431) TATONE LAW, APC 4333 Admiralty Way, Suite 100 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Phone: (424) 289-9707 Fax: (424) 270-9410 Email: mtatone@tatonelegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiff NOVALK, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 ll NOVALK, LLC, Case No: CIVSB2122277 12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’S SEPARATE V. STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF l3 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL SEMIH CIRIT, . FATMA HANDAN CIRIT; FURTHER RESPONSES FROM NC l4 DENIS BARAN CIRIT; SARINA BERNA QUEEN, INC- T0 REQUEST FOR SARGENT; c_TECH, INC; NC QUEEN, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET 15 INC; YUN KYUNG and DOES 1-100, ONE inclusive, l6 [Notice of Motion, Motion to Compel l7 Defendant(s). Further Responses, and [Proposed] Order Concurrently Filed Herewith] l8 Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneidm, Jr. l9 Dept: S32 20 Hearing Date: August 17, 2022 21 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Dept: S32 22 23 24 Plaintiff NOVALK, LLC hereby submits the following Separate Statement of Dispute 25 Answers in support of his Motion to Compel Defendant NC QUEEN, INC. (“Defendant”) to 26 further respond t0 Plaintiff s Requests for Production of Documents, filed concurrently herewith. 27 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3. 1345(a) (3), Plaintiff submits this Separate Statement in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for 28 1 PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’S SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM NC QUEEN, INC. T0 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE