On September 07, 2021 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Novalk, Llc,
and
Cirit, Denis Baran,
Cirit, Fatma Handan,
Cirit, Semih,
C-Tech, Inc,
Does 1-100,
Kim, Yun Kyung,
Kyung, Yun,
Nc Queen, Inc.,
Sargent, Sarina Berna,
for Other Real Property Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
CASE ATTACHMENT COVER PAGE (ENDORSED)
ELECTRON‘ICALLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FILED
STREETADDRess;247 West Third Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
BY SUPERIOR COURT
cnYANDmPcoDE;San Bernardino, CA 92415 OF CALIFORNlA, COUNTY OF
BRANCHNAMESan Bernardino Justice Center San Bernardino
WEBSITE:http / lwww. sb-court org
: . on Jul 6, 2022
CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
ATTACHMENTNAME: Exhibit: Separate Statement (C-Tech) Deputy Clerk.- MeJa/ee Gay
CASE NAME: Novalk,
LLC vs. Semih Cirit, et al. CASE NUMBER:
CIVSB2122277
Please log on to www.TurboCourt.com regularly for updates
Please staple this to your original attachment
fluoa'unoaoqmy/Muq
Michelangelo Tatone (SBN: 290431)
TATONE LAW, APC
4333 Admiralty Way, Suite 100
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: (424) 289-9707
Fax: (424) 270-9410
Email: mtatone@tatonelegal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NOVALK, LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
lO
ll NOVALK, LLC, Case No: C1v332122277
l2 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’s
V.
SEPARATE STATEMENT IN
13 SUPPORT 0F PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
SEMIH CIRIT; FATMA HANDAN T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
l4
CIRIT. I BARA . FROM C-TECH, INC. T0 REQUEST
BERN’ADSEANRSGENT; CN_TCEI§II_E’HS\IACR;I§CA FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,
15
QUEEN, INC; YUN KYUNG and DOES SET ONE
1-100, inclusive,
l6 Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr.
Dept: S32
17 Defendant(s).
Hearing Date: August 17, 2022
18
Hearing Time: 8:30 AM
l9 Dept: S32
20
21 Plaintiff NOVALK, LLC hereby submits the following Separate Statement 0f Disputed
22 Answers in support of its Motion to Compel Defendant C-TECH, INC. (“Defendant”) to further
23 respond to Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production of Documents, filed concurrently herewith.
24 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345(a)(3), Plaintiff submits this Separate
25 Statement in Support of Plaintiff‘s Motion t0 Compel Further Responses to Request for
26 Production of Documents, Set One. This Separate Statement is made on the basis of Defendant’s
27 failure to respond to Plaintiff’s Cal. C.C.P § 2031.010 inspection demand within the 30 day time
limit, resulting in Defendant’s waiver of all objections to the demand, including any claims of
28
1
PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’S SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM C—TECH,
INC. T0 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 0F DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
Document Filed Date
July 06, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 07, 2021
Category
Other Real Property Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CASE ATTACHMENT COVER PAGE (ENDORSED) ELECTRON‘ICALLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FILED STREETADDRess;247 West Third Street MAILING ADDRESS: BY SUPERIOR COURT cnYANDmPcoDE;San Bernardino, CA 92415 OF CALIFORNlA, COUNTY OF BRANCHNAMESan Bernardino Justice Center San Bernardino WEBSITE:http / lwww. sb-court org : . on Jul 6, 2022 CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ATTACHMENTNAME: Exhibit: Separate Statement (C-Tech) Deputy Clerk.- MeJa/ee Gay CASE NAME: Novalk, LLC vs. Semih Cirit, et al. CASE NUMBER: CIVSB2122277 Please log on to www.TurboCourt.com regularly for updates Please staple this to your original attachment fluoa'unoaoqmy/Muq Michelangelo Tatone (SBN: 290431) TATONE LAW, APC 4333 Admiralty Way, Suite 100 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Phone: (424) 289-9707 Fax: (424) 270-9410 Email: mtatone@tatonelegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiff NOVALK, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO lO ll NOVALK, LLC, Case No: C1v332122277 l2 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’s V. SEPARATE STATEMENT IN 13 SUPPORT 0F PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SEMIH CIRIT; FATMA HANDAN T0 COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES l4 CIRIT. I BARA . FROM C-TECH, INC. T0 REQUEST BERN’ADSEANRSGENT; CN_TCEI§II_E’HS\IACR;I§CA FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, 15 QUEEN, INC; YUN KYUNG and DOES SET ONE 1-100, inclusive, l6 Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr. Dept: S32 17 Defendant(s). Hearing Date: August 17, 2022 18 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM l9 Dept: S32 20 21 Plaintiff NOVALK, LLC hereby submits the following Separate Statement 0f Disputed 22 Answers in support of its Motion to Compel Defendant C-TECH, INC. (“Defendant”) to further 23 respond to Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production of Documents, filed concurrently herewith. 24 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345(a)(3), Plaintiff submits this Separate 25 Statement in Support of Plaintiff‘s Motion t0 Compel Further Responses to Request for 26 Production of Documents, Set One. This Separate Statement is made on the basis of Defendant’s 27 failure to respond to Plaintiff’s Cal. C.C.P § 2031.010 inspection demand within the 30 day time limit, resulting in Defendant’s waiver of all objections to the demand, including any claims of 28 1 PLAINTIFF NOVALK, LLC’S SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM C—TECH, INC. T0 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 0F DOCUMENTS, SET ONE