arrow left
arrow right
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Gordon L. Dayton, Esq., (SBN: 208379) LAW OFFICES 0F GORDON L. DAYTON 41856 Ivy Street, Suite 214 Murrieta, CA 92562 Telephone (951) 296—5303 ° Facsimile (951) 296—5319 Attorney for Plaintiffs, ANTHONY L. PEREZ and SANDRA L. PEREZ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ANTHONY L. PEREZ, an individual, SANDRA L. Case N0. CIVD81913814 10 PEREZ, an individual, ANTHONY L. PEREZ, Successor-in-Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN DECLARATION OF GORDON L. DAYTON 11 LEE PEREZ, and SANDRA L. PEREZ, Successor- WITH EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF in-Interest to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND MOTION TO 12 PEREZ COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 13 Plaintiffs, HEALTH, AND FOR $3,150 IN MONETARY SANCTIONS 14 Filed Concurrently with Notice of Motion and VS. 15 Second Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and for $3,150 in Monetary Sanctions. 16 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, a nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, a nonprofit [California Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 17 corporation; LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 2030.290(b)] 18 CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL a nonprofit corporation; ALBERT KHERADPOUR M.D., an individual; CHENUE ABONGWA M.D., an individual; Date: June 28, 2022 19 CHELSEA L. COLLINS M.D., an individual; Time: 8:30 am. BATUL SUTERWALA M.D., an individual; Dept: $23 20 VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M.D., an 21 individual; ALEXANDER ZOUROS M.D, an individual; YUTHANA KONG, P.A., an 22 individual; PILAR D. PICHON M.D., an Trial Date: None Assigned GAMIL FTEEH M.D., an individual; Action Filed: May 6, 2019 individual; 23 THOMAS P. BRAVO M.D., an individual; MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER M.D., an 24 individual; KHYATI P. MEHTA M.D., an 1 DECLARATION OF GORDON L. DAYTON WITH EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR SANCTIONS individual; KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN M.D., an individual; SARAH C. PETERSON M.D., an individual; BESH R. BARCEGA M.D., an individual; NATASHA Y. LI M.D., an individual; LANCE A. BROWN M.D., an individual; TOMMY Y. KIM M.D., an individual; ANDREA W. THORP M.D, an individual; DAVID RICHTER M.D., an individual, and DOES 2-200, inclusive, Defendants. I, Gordon L. Dayton, Esq., declare as follows: I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all courts of the State of California, and counsel for Plaintiffs in this action. This declaration is submitted in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to 10 Compel Responses, and Request for Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant and 11 Defense Counsel in the Sum Of $3,150.00. The following facts are within my personal knowledge 12 and, if called as a witness herein, I can and will competently testify thereto. 13 On March 29, 2021, Plaintiff ANTHONY L. PEREZ (hereinafter referred to as “A. PEREZ” 0r 14 “Propounding Plaintiff”) propounded and served his first set of request for production 0f documents 15 on defendant LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH (hereinafter referred to as “LLUH” 0r “De- 16 fendant”). Much of this discovery has t0 do with electronic records relating t0 medical case manage- 17 ment and missing and/or deleted medical records. Plaintiffs sought this discovery to bolster their ar- 18 guments for punitive damages and preparation for trial. 19 On May 3, 2021, Defendant LLUH submitted their responses t0 the Propounding Plaintiff. After 20 review of the responses, Plaintiffs’ alleged that Defendant LLUH failed to adequately respond t0 dis— 21 covery as the responses were substantially defective, being evasive and incomplete. Additionally, 22 each of the requests for production 0f document responses interposed patently meridess evidentiary 23 objections. 24 2 DECLARATION OF GORDON L. DAYTON WITH EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR SANCTIONS