On May 06, 2019 a Hearing was filed involving a dispute between Anthony L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez, Perez, Anthony L, Perez, Sandra L, Sandra L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez, and Abongwa M.D., Chenue, Barcega M.D., Besh R, Bravo M.D, Thomas P, Brown M.D., Lance A, Collins M.D., Chelsea L, Does 2-200, Inclusive, Fteeh M.D., Gamil, Kheradpour M.D., Albert, Kim M.D., Tommy Y, Klooster M.D., Marquelle J, Kong, P.A., Yuthana, Li M.D., Natasha Y, Loma Linda University Children'S Hospital A Nonprofit Corporation, Loma Linda University Health A Nonprofit Corporation, Loma Linda University Medical Center A Nonprofit Corporation, Mehta M.D., Khyati P, Peterson M.D., Sarah C, Pichon M.D., Pilar D, Richter, David, Sadanand M.D., Venkatraman, Suterwala M.D., Batul, Thorp M.D., Andrea W, Zimmerman M.D, Kimberly R, Zouros M.D., Alexander, for Complaint for Medical Malpractice in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
F D 1 Dennis K Ames Esq State Bar No 81460 SQA N N1y 0 q G 7U r7 Michael D Reid Esq State Bar No 222014 BERNApq N pfSTqCTp Melissa Fischer Esq State Bar No 246752 A I Q 3 Danielle M VandenBos Esq State Bar No LA FOLLETTE JOHNSON DeHAAS FESLER 279852 AMES ZO20 2677 North Main Street Suite 901 111j4 By Santa Ana California 92705 6632 Telephone 714 558 7008 Facsimile 714 972 0379 Q 5 pep o Attorneys for Defendants 6 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BESH R BARCEGA rj MD THOMAS P BRAVO MD LANCE A BROWN MD CHELSEA L COLLINS M D GAMIL FTEEH M D TOMMY Y KIM M D ALBERT KHERADPOUR M D MARQUELLE J g KLOOSTER M D YUTHANA KONG P A NATASHA Y LI M D KHYATI P MEHTA M D SARAH C PETERSON M D 9 PILAR D PICHON M D VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M D W KIMBERLY R ZIMMERMAN MD CHENUE ABONGWA Q 10 M D ALEXANDER ZOUROS M D and ANDREA THORP M D W 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA w 12 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 13 ANTHONY L PEREZ an individual Case No CIVDS1913814 Z 14 SANDRA L PEREZ an individual Judge Donald R Alvarez 0 ANTHONY L PEREZ Successor In Interest Department S23 to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PEREZ 15 and SANDRA L PEREZ Successor In REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO Interest to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT W 16 PEREZ BY DEFENDANTS J 17 Plaintiffs Q Filed concurrently with Reply ira Support of Motion to Sb ike Portions of Plaintiffs Third Amended 1g vs ComplaintJ 19 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH a Non Profit Corporation LOMA LINDA DATE 08 21 2020 20 LJNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER a Non TIME 9 00 A M Profit Corporation LOMA LINDA DEPT S23 21 LJNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL a Non Profit Corporation 22 ALBERTKHERADPOUR MD an Individual CHENUE ABONGWA M D an 23 Individual CHELSEA L COLLINS M D an Individual BATLTL SUTERWALDA M D 24 an Individual VENKATRAMAN SADAIVAND MD an Individual 25 ALEXANDER ZOUROS MD an Individual YUTHANA KONG P A an 26 Individual PILAR D PICHON MD an Individual GAMIL FTEEH MD an 27 Individual THOMAS P BRAVO M D an Individual MARQUELLE J KLOOSTER 28 MD an Individual KHYATI P MEHTA MD an Individual KIMBERI Y R 1 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ZIMMERMAN M D an Individual SARAH 1 C PETERSON M D an Individual BESH R BARCEGA M D an Individual NATASHA 2 Y L MD an Individual LANCE A BROWN M D an Individual TOMMY Y ACTION FILED OS 06 19 3 KIM M D Individual an ANDREA W TAC FILED 06 02 20 TORP M D an Individual and DOES 1 200 TRIAL DATE None Set 4 inclusive 5 Defendants 6 TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD 7 Defendants Loma Linda Health Besh R Barcega M D University Thomas P Bravo M D g Lance A Brown M D Chelsea L Collins MD Gamil Fteeh M D Y Kim M D Albert Tommy 9 Kheradpour M D Marquelle J Klooster M D Yuthana Kong P A Natasha Y Li M D Khyati P W Q 10 Mehta M D Sarah C Peterson M D Pilar D Pichon M D Venkatraman Sadanand M D Kimberly a W11 R Zimmerman MD Chenue Abongwa MD Alexander Zouros M D and Andrea Thorp M D w 12 hereinafter collectively to as Defendants referred hereby reply to Plaintiffs opposing papers as 13 follows 0 0 z 14 I INTRODUCTION 15 Rather than file an opposition to Defendants demurrer to the third amended complaint Plaintiffs w W 16 have filed a motion to strike the demurrer on the grounds it was untimely filed However as set forth J LL 17 Q below Defendants timely filed the demurrer and given the lack of a substantive opposition the demurrer J g should be sustained without leave to amend 19 IL PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO TIMELY SERVE THEIR OPPOSING BRIEF 24 Pursuant to Code ofCivil Pf ocedure section 1005 b papers opposing a motion shall be filed with 21 the court and a copy served on each party at least 9 court days before the hearing In addition as to the 22 service of the opposing papers Section 1005 c also requires the following 23 A 11 papers opposing a motion and all reply papers shall be served by personal delivery 24 facsimile transmission express mail or other means consistent with Sections 25 1010 1011 1012 and 1013 and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other 26 party or parties not later than the close of the next business day after the time the opposing 27 papers or reply papers as applicable are filed 28 Here given the hearing date of August 21 2020 Plaintiffs opposing papers were due on August 2 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS TI RD AMENDED COMPLAINT