On May 06, 2019 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Anthony L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez,
Perez, Anthony L,
Perez, Sandra L,
Sandra L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez,
and
Abongwa M.D., Chenue,
Barcega M.D., Besh R,
Bravo M.D, Thomas P,
Brown M.D., Lance A,
Collins M.D., Chelsea L,
Does 2-200, Inclusive,
Fteeh M.D., Gamil,
Kheradpour M.D., Albert,
Kim M.D., Tommy Y,
Klooster M.D., Marquelle J,
Kong, P.A., Yuthana,
Li M.D., Natasha Y,
Loma Linda University Children'S Hospital A Nonprofit Corporation,
Loma Linda University Health A Nonprofit Corporation,
Loma Linda University Medical Center A Nonprofit Corporation,
Mehta M.D., Khyati P,
Peterson M.D., Sarah C,
Pichon M.D., Pilar D,
Richter, David,
Sadanand M.D., Venkatraman,
Suterwala M.D., Batul,
Thorp M.D., Andrea W,
Zimmerman M.D, Kimberly R,
Zouros M.D., Alexander,
for Complaint for Medical Malpractice
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Gordon L. Dayton, Esq., (SBN: 208379)
LAW OFFICES 0F GORDON L. DAYTON
41856 Ivy Street, Suite 214
Murrieta, CA 92562
Telephone (951) 296-5303 -
Facsimile (951) 296-5319 F
Slégifijopg;JUETECP
3"" BFRNA
Cl
FM
1.1%.}, N iA l (En
Plaintiffs, ANTHONY L. PEREZ
1 I
Attorney for Rafi’mfifswgf
and SANDRA L. PEREZ
JU A ,
I
1 8 2021
“m i4 Q. XL
Ne’rfiLNK’ {‘J-l
11‘: Y!“ qt” “I'Tv
gt:P
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
ANTHONY L. PEREZ, an individual, SANDRA L. Case No. CIVD81913814
10 PEREZ, an individual, ANTHONY L. PEREZ,
Successor—in-Interest to the ESTATE OF JORDAN SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF
11 LEE PEREZ, and SANDRA L. PEREZ, Successor— NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO
in-Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
12 PEREZ SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE,
AND FOR $2,600 IN MONETARY
13 Plaintiffs, SANCTIONS
14 Filed Concurrently with Notice of Motion and
vs. Motion toCompel Further Responses to Special
15 Interrogatories, Set One, and for $2,600 in
Monetary Sanctions.
16 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, a
nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA [California Rules of Court (“CRC”), Rule 3.1345]
17 UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, a nonprofit
corporation; LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
18 CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL a nonprofit corporation; Date: July 26, 2021
ALBERT KHERADPOUR M.D., an individual; Time: 9:00 am.
19 CHENUE ABONGWA M.D., an individual; Dept: S23
CHELSEA L. COLLINS M.D., an individual;
20 BATUL SUTERWALA M.D., an individual;
VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M.D., an
21 individual; ALEXANDER ZOUROS M.D, an Trial Date: None Assigned
individual; YUTHANA KONG, P.A., an Action Filed: May 6, 2019
22 individual; PILAR D. PICHON M.D., an
individual; GAMIL FTEEH M.D., an individual;
23 THOMAS P. BRAVO M.D., an individual;
MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER M.D., an
24 individual; KHYATI P. MEHTA M.D., an
1
SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
TO REQUEST FOR SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
V \/
individual; KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN M.D.,
an individual; SARAH C. PETERSON M.D., an
individual; BESH R. BARCEGA M.D., an
individual; NATASHA Y. LI M.D., an individual;
LANCE A. BROWN M.D., an individual;
TOMMY Y. KIM M.D., an individual; ANDREA
W. THORP M.D, an individual; DAVID RICHTER
M.D., an individual, and DOES 2—200, inclusive,
Defendants.
Plaintiff submits this separate statement in support of notice of motion and motion to compel
further responses to special interrogatories, Set One, and for $2,600 in monetary sanction in
10 compliance with CRC, Rule 3.1345.
11 General Objections:
12 Legal and Factual Reasons for Compelling Further Response:
13 General objections, by definition, are “too general” t0 be properly made. CCP § 2030.300(a)
14 (3). Even though several interrogatories may be objectionable on the same ground they may not be
15 objected to as a group. Hogan and Weber, California Civil Discovery (2d. ed 2009) § 518. Plaintiff
16 requests the Court order Defendant to provide further responses, without any improper general or
17 blanket objections.
18 SPECIAL INTERROGATQRIES NO. l
19 IDENTIFY all CLINICAL CRITERIA SOFTWARE utilized by YOU during the
20 INCIDENT.
21 RELATED DEFINITIONS USED:
22 “IDENTIFY” with respect to a person means to provide the name, address (including city,
23 and zip code) and telephone number. IDENTIFY with respect to a
state
DOCUMENT means
24 to state the nature of the document, its title, the date it bears and the location of the original
2
SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
TO REQUEST FOR SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS