On May 06, 2019 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Anthony L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez,
Perez, Anthony L,
Perez, Sandra L,
Sandra L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez,
and
Abongwa M.D., Chenue,
Barcega M.D., Besh R,
Bravo M.D, Thomas P,
Brown M.D., Lance A,
Collins M.D., Chelsea L,
Does 2-200, Inclusive,
Fteeh M.D., Gamil,
Kheradpour M.D., Albert,
Kim M.D., Tommy Y,
Klooster M.D., Marquelle J,
Kong, P.A., Yuthana,
Li M.D., Natasha Y,
Loma Linda University Children'S Hospital A Nonprofit Corporation,
Loma Linda University Health A Nonprofit Corporation,
Loma Linda University Medical Center A Nonprofit Corporation,
Mehta M.D., Khyati P,
Peterson M.D., Sarah C,
Pichon M.D., Pilar D,
Richter, David,
Sadanand M.D., Venkatraman,
Suterwala M.D., Batul,
Thorp M.D., Andrea W,
Zimmerman M.D, Kimberly R,
Zouros M.D., Alexander,
for Complaint for Medical Malpractice
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
H
n
‘
v
1
fl‘
GordonL. Dayton, Esq., (SBN: 208379)
LAW OFFICES 0F GORDON L. DAYTON
‘
2 \
41856 Ivy Street Suite 214
‘
[
Murrieta, CA 92562
3 i
j‘
Telephone (951) 296- 5303 Facsimile (951) 296- 5319
4 ‘
Attorney for Plaintiffs, ANTHONY L. PEREZ
‘
j
and SANDRA L. PEREZ
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I H COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
9W
\
\ANTHONYL. PEREZ, anindividual, SANDRA L. Case N0. CIVDSl913814
10 PEREZ an individual, ANTHONY L PEREZ,
H
Su-ccessor --1n -Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
llj LEE PEREZ and SANDRA L. PEREZ, Successor- HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
in--Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN
1
p LEE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA
LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, AND FOR
I
Plaintiffs, MONETARY SANCTIONS, AND
$3,150 IN
i
FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
vs. NOTICE
Date: June 28, 2022
16 fl
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, a Time: 8:30 a.m.
j
>
nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA Dept: 823
“
17 UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, a nonprofit
corporation; LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
‘
Trial Date: None Assigned
18‘ CHILDREN' S HOSPITAL a nonprofit corporation; Action Filed: May 6, 2019
w
M ALBERT KHERADPOUR M. D. ,an individual;
19
‘
CHENUE ABONGWA M. D. an individual;
1‘
CHELSEA L. COLLINS M. D. ,an individual;
20 BATUL SUTERWALA M. D. ,an individual;
W VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M D an
211 M individual; ALEXANDER ZOUROS M. D, an
‘
individual; YUTHANA KONG, P. A. ,an
22‘ individual, PILAR D PICHON M D an
individual; GAMIL FTEEH M. D. ,an individual;
j
i
‘
23 THOMAS P. BRAVO M. D. ,an individual;
l
24: ‘STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 0F HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
;
MOTION
W To
1
U
COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
1
‘
HEALTH.
MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER M.D., an
individual; KHYATI P. MEHTA M.D., an
individual; KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN M.D.,
9
an individual; SARAH C. PETERSON M.D., an
:1 individual; BESH R. BARCEGA M.D., an
‘
individual; NATASHA Y. LI M.D., an individual;
LANCE A. BROWN M.D., an individual;
TOMMY Y. KIM M.D., an individual; ANDREA
W. THORP MD, an individual; DAVID RICHTER
1
M.D., an individual, and DOES 2-200, inclusive,
Defendants.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Defendant, Lorna Linda University Health’s, Opposition t0 Plaintiff s Motion
10 and Amended Motion to Compel Second Further Responses Without Objections t0 Request for
11‘
‘
Production 0f Documents, Set One, was served on June 15, 2022 Via overnight delivery service 0f
12 General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to circumstances outside of the control
13,1 of the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022.
14 WHEREAS, Defendants’ Objections to the Evidence Submitted by Plaintiffs, in Support of
15 ‘
Motion and Amended Motion t0 Compel Second Further Response, was served 0n June 15, 2022 Via
16" overnight delivery service 0f General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to
17,. .
circumstances outside of the control 0f the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022.
18 WHEREAS, Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice in Support of
19 Motion and Amended Motion to Compel Second Further Response, was served 0n June 15, 2022 Via
203 overnight delivery service 0f General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to
211 circumstances outside of the control 0f the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022.
221 j
WHEREAS, Defendants” Oppositions and Objection are voluminous, and require significant
23? time to review and reply t0,
2
24‘7
‘STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND MOTION
TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
HEALTH.
Preview
H n ‘ v 1 fl‘ GordonL. Dayton, Esq., (SBN: 208379) LAW OFFICES 0F GORDON L. DAYTON ‘ 2 \ 41856 Ivy Street Suite 214 ‘ [ Murrieta, CA 92562 3 i j‘ Telephone (951) 296- 5303 Facsimile (951) 296- 5319 4 ‘ Attorney for Plaintiffs, ANTHONY L. PEREZ ‘ j and SANDRA L. PEREZ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA I H COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 9W \ \ANTHONYL. PEREZ, anindividual, SANDRA L. Case N0. CIVDSl913814 10 PEREZ an individual, ANTHONY L PEREZ, H Su-ccessor --1n -Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF llj LEE PEREZ and SANDRA L. PEREZ, Successor- HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND in--Interest t0 the ESTATE OF JORDAN 1 p LEE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, AND FOR I Plaintiffs, MONETARY SANCTIONS, AND $3,150 IN i FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL vs. NOTICE Date: June 28, 2022 16 fl LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, a Time: 8:30 a.m. j > nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA Dept: 823 “ 17 UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, a nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ‘ Trial Date: None Assigned 18‘ CHILDREN' S HOSPITAL a nonprofit corporation; Action Filed: May 6, 2019 w M ALBERT KHERADPOUR M. D. ,an individual; 19 ‘ CHENUE ABONGWA M. D. an individual; 1‘ CHELSEA L. COLLINS M. D. ,an individual; 20 BATUL SUTERWALA M. D. ,an individual; W VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M D an 211 M individual; ALEXANDER ZOUROS M. D, an ‘ individual; YUTHANA KONG, P. A. ,an 22‘ individual, PILAR D PICHON M D an individual; GAMIL FTEEH M. D. ,an individual; j i ‘ 23 THOMAS P. BRAVO M. D. ,an individual; l 24: ‘STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 0F HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND ; MOTION W To 1 U COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 1 ‘ HEALTH. MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER M.D., an individual; KHYATI P. MEHTA M.D., an individual; KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN M.D., 9 an individual; SARAH C. PETERSON M.D., an :1 individual; BESH R. BARCEGA M.D., an ‘ individual; NATASHA Y. LI M.D., an individual; LANCE A. BROWN M.D., an individual; TOMMY Y. KIM M.D., an individual; ANDREA W. THORP MD, an individual; DAVID RICHTER 1 M.D., an individual, and DOES 2-200, inclusive, Defendants. RECITALS WHEREAS, Defendant, Lorna Linda University Health’s, Opposition t0 Plaintiff s Motion 10 and Amended Motion to Compel Second Further Responses Without Objections t0 Request for 11‘ ‘ Production 0f Documents, Set One, was served on June 15, 2022 Via overnight delivery service 0f 12 General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to circumstances outside of the control 13,1 of the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022. 14 WHEREAS, Defendants’ Objections to the Evidence Submitted by Plaintiffs, in Support of 15 ‘ Motion and Amended Motion t0 Compel Second Further Response, was served 0n June 15, 2022 Via 16" overnight delivery service 0f General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to 17,. . circumstances outside of the control 0f the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022. 18 WHEREAS, Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice in Support of 19 Motion and Amended Motion to Compel Second Further Response, was served 0n June 15, 2022 Via 203 overnight delivery service 0f General Logistics Systems US, Inc. (“GLS”); however, due to 211 circumstances outside of the control 0f the Parties was not received by Plaintiff until June 20, 2022. 221 j WHEREAS, Defendants” Oppositions and Objection are voluminous, and require significant 23? time to review and reply t0, 2 24‘7 ‘STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH.