arrow left
arrow right
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

DennisK. Ames, Esq” State Bar No 81460 MichaelD. Reid, Esq” State Bar No 222014 Melissa Fischer Esq. State Bar No. 246752 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DeHAAS, FESLER & AMES l L FD 2677 Nonh Main Street, Suite 901 Santa Ana, California 92705-6632 couu my»! ENA {.53 0N?) n?g??ém Telephone (714) 558- 7008 Facsimile (714) 972- 0379 Email: mreid@1jdfa. com JUL 1 3 2021 Attorneys for Defendants MU \OOOVQU‘AUJNH LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, BESH R. BARCEGA, _ flip}, M D., THOMAS P BRAVO, M. D. ,LANCE A. BROWN, M D., Deputy CHELSEAL. COLLINS, M.D., GAMIL FTEEH, MUD ,TOMMY Y. KIM, M. D. ,ALBERT KHERADPOUR, M. D. ,MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER, M D. YUTHANA KONG, P A., NATASHAY. LI, MD. ,KHYATI P MEHTA, M.D ,SARAH C PETERSON, M. D., PILARD PICHON, M..D ,VENKATRAMAN SADANAND, M.D ,KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN, M.D CHENUE ABONGWA M D. ALEXANDER ZOUROS, M. D. ,ANDREA AMES & THORP, M. D ,BUTAL SUTERWALA, M D., and DAVID FESLER RICHTER, M D. SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DeHAAS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JOHNSON, NNHp—Ab—‘y—Ah—‘u—AHp—tr—ab—i ANTHONY L. PEREZ, an individual; CASE NO.: CIVDSI913814 SANDRA L. PEREZ, an individual, FOLLETFE. ANTHONY L. PEREZ, Successor—In-Interest JUDGE DONALD ALVAREZ to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PEREZ, DEPT $23 and SANDRA L. PEREZ, Successor—In— LA ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE Interest to the DEFENDANT, LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY PEREZ, HEALTH’S, OPPOSITION T0 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION T0 COMPEL FURTHER Plaintiffs, RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTIONS, TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; vs. MEMORANDUM 0F POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION 0F MELISSA LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, a E.FISHER;DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH nonprofit corporation; LOMA LINDA TAPIA;REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IN THE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, a AMOUNT OF $2,700; SEPARATE LOMA LINDA nonprofit corporation; STATEMENT; EXHIBITS N UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, a nonprofit corporation; ALBERT DATE: July 26, 2021 KHERADPOUR, M.D., an individual; TIME: 9:00 A.M. CHENUE ABONGWA, M.D., an individual; DEPT 823 CHELSEA L. COLLINS, M.D.; an individual; BATUL SUTERWALDA, M.D., First Amended Complaint Date: 7/3 1/2019 an individual; VENKATRAMAN SADANAND, M.D., an individual; TRIAL DATE: None Set ALEXANDER ZOUROS, M.D., an ACTION FILED: 05/06/1 9 individual; YUTHANA KONG, P.A., an individual; ;PILAR D. PICHON, M.D., an individual; GAMIL FTEEH, M.D., an -1 DEFENDANT, LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTIONS, TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE V v individual; THOMAS P. BRAVO, M.D., an individual; MARQUELLE J. KLOOSTER, M.D., an individual; KHYATI P. MEHTA, M.D., an individual; KIMBERLY R. ZIMMERMAN, M.D., an individual; SARAH C. PETERSON, M.D., an individual; BESH R. BARCEGA, M.D., an Individual; NATASHA Y. L, M.D., an individual; LANCE A. BROWN, M.D., an individual; \DOONQUI-PUJNp—A TOMMY Y. KIM, M.D., an individual; ANDREA W. THORP, M.D., an individual; and DOES 1-200, inclusive., Defendants. TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: AMES Defendant, Loma Linda University Health, hereby opposes Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Further & FESLER Responses to Special Intenogatories, Set One. Defendant stands by their objections and responses previously provides, and otherwise opposes Plaintiffs’ Motion as set forth herein. DeHAAS, This opposition will be based on the fact that defendant’s responses to special interrogatories, set one, including obj actions, arc wholly appropriate and in conformance with existing case law. JOHNSON, Furthermore, plaintifis and/or their attorneys of record failed to meet and confer in good faith prior to NNNr—Ir—Ir—Ar—AHHp—Ar—Iy—AH FOLLETI'E, bringing this motion and bring this motion without substantial justification, seeking only to harass defendant. Accordingly, Loma Linda University Health seeks sanctions in the amount of $2,700 against LA plaintiffs and their attorneys of records, jointly and severally. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// -2- DEFENDANT, LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTI-ER RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBIECTIONS, TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE