arrow left
arrow right
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • PEREZ -V- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, ET AL Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

or o o o p 1 Dennis K Ames Esq State Bar No 81460 Michael D Reid Esq State Bar No 222014 F I L D 2 Melissa Fischer Esq State Bar No 246752 COUNTY pF qN SAN BERN 1RnIP gEf ARDiNO Danielle M VandenBos Esq State Bar No 279852 TROC7 3 LA FOLLETTE JOHNSON DeHAAS FESLER AMES 4 2677 North Main Street Suite 901 S P 3 0 2020 Santa Ana California 92705 6632 g Telephone 714 558 7008 Facsimile 714 972 0379 5 Y Q Attorneys for Defendants Deputy 6 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BESH R BARCEGA M D THOMAS P BRAVO M D LANCE A BROWN M D CHELSEA L COLLINS M D GAMIL FTEEH M D TOMMY Y KIM M D ALBERT KHERADPOUR M D MARQLTELLE J g KLOOSTER M D YUTHANA KONG P A NATASHA Y LI M D KHYATI P MEHTA M D SARAH C PETERSON M D 9 PILAR D PICHON M D VENKATRAMAN SADANAND M D W KIMBERLY R ZIMMERMAN MD CHENUE ABONGWA Q 10 MD ALEXANDER ZOUROS M D and ANDREA THORP M D a W 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA W 12 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 13 ANTHONY L PEREZ an individual Case No CIVDS1913814 Z SANDRA L PEREZ an individual Judge Donald R Alvarez 14 ANTHONY L PEREZ Successor In Interest Department S23 to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PEREZ 15 SANDRA L PEREZ Successor In and REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE Interest to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD W 16 PEREZ AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS J LL 1 Plaintiffs Filed concurrently with Reply in Support of DemurreY to Plaintiffs Third Amended ComplaintJ 18 vs 19 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH a DATE 10 7 2020 Non Profit Corporation LOMA LINDA TIME 9 00 A M 20 LTNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER a Non DEPT S23 Profit Corporation LOMA LINDA 21 UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL a Non Profit Corporation 22 ALBERTKHERADPOUR MD an Individual CHENUE ABONGWA MD an 23 Individual CHELSEA L COLLINS M D an Individual BATLTL SUTERWALDA M D 24 Individual an VENKATRAMAN SADANAND MD an Individual 25 ALEXANDER ZOUROS MD an Individual YUTHANA KONG P A an 26 Individual PILAR D PICHON M D an Individual GAMIL FTEEH MD an 27 Individual THOMAS P BRAVO M D an Individual MARQUELLE J KLOOSTER 28 MD an Individual KHYATI P MEHTA MD an Individual KIMBERLY R 1 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ZIMMERMAN M D an Individual SARAH 1 C PETERSON M D an Individual BESH R BARCEGA M D an Individual NATASHA 2 Y L M D an Individual LANCE A BROWN M D an Individual TOMMY Y ACTION FILED OS 06 19 3 KIM M D an Individual ANDREA W TAC FILED 06 02 20 TORP M D an Individual and DOES 1 200 TRIAL DATE None Set 4 inclusive 5 Defendants 6 TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD 7 Defendants Loma Linda Health Besh R Barcega M D University Thomas P Bravo M D g Lance A Brown M D Chelsea L Collins M D Gamil Fteeh M D Tommy Y Kim M D Albert 9 Kheradpour M D Marquelle J Klooster M D Yuthana Kong P A Nafasha Y Li M D Khyati P W Q 10 Mehta M D Sarah C Peterson M D Pilar D Pichon M D Venkatraman Sadanand M D Kimberly a 11 R Zimmerman IVI D Chenue Abongwa MD Alexander Zouros M D and Andrea Thorp M D w 12 hereinafter collectively to as Defendants referred hereby reply to Plaintiffs opposing papers as 13 follows 0 0 z 14 L INTRODUCTION 15 The hearing on this motion to strike was originally scheduled for August 21 2020 Prior to the w W16 hearing Plaintiffs counsel requested a continuance and the hearing was continued to September 8 2020 J 17 Q At the time of that hearing Plaintiffs counsel advised the Court that he had not filed oppositions to the J 1g demurrer and motion to strike and instead opted to file motions to strike the pleadings on the grounds 19 they were untimely filed Plaintiffs counsel also explained that he encountered issues filing these 24 motions and therefore requested a further continuance of the hearing The Court granted the request and 21 to October 7 2020 continued the hearing Declaration of Danielle M VandenBos Esq hereinafter 22 referred to as VandenBos Decl 13 23 Prior to the October 7 2020 Plaintiffs have again failed to file any oppositions to the demurrer 24 and motion to strike and instead filed their motions to strike set for hearing on October 20 2020 Based 25 on Plaintiffs failure to timely file any opposition to Defendants demurrer and motion to strike Plaintiffs 26 have waived any right to oppose on procedural or substantive grounds In addition in the event the Court 27 considers Plaintiffs motions to strike as their opposing papers to the instant motion to strike as set forth 28 below Defendants timely filed the motion to strike and given the lack of a substantive opposition the 2 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTLFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT