On May 06, 2019 a Hearing was filed involving a dispute between Anthony L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez, Perez, Anthony L, Perez, Sandra L, Sandra L Perez, Successor-In-Interest To The Estate Of Jordan Lee Perez, and Abongwa M.D., Chenue, Barcega M.D., Besh R, Bravo M.D, Thomas P, Brown M.D., Lance A, Collins M.D., Chelsea L, Does 2-200, Inclusive, Fteeh M.D., Gamil, Kheradpour M.D., Albert, Kim M.D., Tommy Y, Klooster M.D., Marquelle J, Kong, P.A., Yuthana, Li M.D., Natasha Y, Loma Linda University Children'S Hospital A Nonprofit Corporation, Loma Linda University Health A Nonprofit Corporation, Loma Linda University Medical Center A Nonprofit Corporation, Mehta M.D., Khyati P, Peterson M.D., Sarah C, Pichon M.D., Pilar D, Richter, David, Sadanand M.D., Venkatraman, Suterwala M.D., Batul, Thorp M.D., Andrea W, Zimmerman M.D, Kimberly R, Zouros M.D., Alexander, for Complaint for Medical Malpractice in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
1 Dennis K Ames Esq State Bar No 814b0 4U C qt Michael D Reid Esq State Bar No 222014 R E r 2 Melissa Fischer Esq State Bar No 246752 Danielle M VandenBos Esq State Bar No 279852 fi T r 3 LA FOLLETTE JOHNSON DeHAAS FESLER AMES f 2677 Narth Main Street Suite 901 4 Santa Ana California 92705 6632 r Telephone 714 558 008 Facsimile 714 972 0379 S Attarneys for Defendants LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BESH R BARCEGA M D THOMAS P BRAVO M D LANCE A BROWN M D 7 CHELSEA L C JLLINS M D GAMIL FTEEH M D TOMMYY KIM M D ALBERT KHERADPOUR MD MARQUELLE J KLQOSTER MD YIITHANA KONG P A NATASHA Y LI MD KHYATT P MEHTA M D SARAH C PETERSON M D 9 PILAR D PICHON M D VENI ATR AMAN SADANAND M D KIMBERLY R ZIMMERMAN MD CHENt7E ABONGWA 10 M D ALEXANDER ZOUROS M D and ANDREA THORP M D W 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA w 12 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 ANTHONY L PEREZ an individual CaseNa CIVDS1913814 Z SANDRA L PEREZ an individual Judge Donald R Alvarez 14 A1 3THQNY L PEREZ Successor In Depat ment S23 a nterest z to the ESTATE OF JORDAN LEE PEREZ ls and SANDRA L PEREZ Successor In OPPOSITION TQ PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO Interest to the ESTATE 4F JORDAN LEE STRIKE DEFENDANTS MOTIQN TQ STRIKE W 16 PEREZ PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS a 17 Flaintiffs Filed eoncurrently with Opposition to Plaintiffs lx vs Motion to Sti ike Defendants Demura er to Plaintiffs Third Amended ComplairctJ LC MA LTNDA UNIVERSITI IEALTH a Non Profit Carporation LOMA LINDA 4 IINIVERSITY MEDICAL CE1 ITER a Non DATE 1O12012020 Profit Corporation LOMA LINDA TIME 9 04 A 1VI 21 UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL a DEPT S23 Non Profit Corporation 22 ALBERTKHERADPOUR MD an Individua CFIENUE ABONGWA M D an 23 Individual CHELSEA L COLLINS M D an Individual BATIJL SUTERWAL DA MD 24 an Individual VENKATRAMAN SADANAND MD an Individual ALEXANDER Zt UROS MD an Individual YUTHANA KONG P A an Individual PILAR D PICHON MD an Individual GAMIL FTEEH MD an 27 Individual THC MAS P BRAVU M D an Individual MARQUCLLE J KLOOSTER 2g MD an Individual KHYATI P MEHTA MD a2 Individual KIMBERI Y R 1 4PPOSTTTON TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PORTI NS OP PLAINTIFFS THIRD ANIENDED COMF LAINT BY DEFEN ANTS ZIMMERMAN M D an Individual SARAH C PETERSON M D an Individual BESH R BARCEGA M D an Individual NATASHA 2 Y L MD an Individuat LANCE A BROWN MD an Individual TOMMY Y KIM MD an Individual ANDREA W TORP M D an Individual and DOES 1 200 ACTION FILED OS 06 l9 4 06 02 20 inclusive TAC FILED TRIAL DATE Nane Set 5 Defendants 6 7 T4 PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTQR TEY OF REC JRD Defendants Loma Linda University Health Besb R Barcega MD Thomas P Brava MD 9 Lance A Brown M D C L Collins M D Gamil Fteeh M D aelsea Tommy Y Kim M D Albert w Q 10 Kheradpour M D Marquelle J Klooster M D Yuthana Kong P A Natasha Y Li M D Khyati P W 11 Mehta M D Sarah C Peterson M D Pilar D Pichon M D Venkatraman Sadanand M D Kimberly w 12 R Zimmerman MD Chenue Abongwa MD Alexander Zouras M D and Andrea Thorp 1VI D 13 hereinafter collectively referred to as Defendants hereby subrnit their opposition to Flaintiffs motion 0 4 to strike Defendants motion to strike portions of P ai tiffs third amended complaint z 15 I INTRODiTCTION w W 16 The instant motion to strike will likely be moot by the time it is heard by this Caurt on October 17 20 2020 Previausly Defendants filed a motian to strike portians of Plaintiffs third amended complaint Q i set for hearing an August 21 2020 Prior to the hearing Plaintiffs caunsel requested a continuance and 19 the hearing was continued to September 8 2020 At the time of that hearing Plaintiffs counsel advised 20 the Court that he had not filed oppositions to the demurrer and motion to strike and instead opted to fi1e l motions to strike the pleadirtgs on the grounds they were untimely filed Plaintiffs counsel also explained 22 that he encountered issues filing these motions and therefore requested a further continuance of the 23 The Court hearing granted the request and continued the hearing ta October 7 2020 Declaration of 24 Danielle M VandenBos hereinafter ta as VandenBos Decl 12 Esq referred Prror to the 4ctober 7 2020 Plaintiffs again failed to fiie any oppositions to the demurrer and motion to strike and instead filed their mations to strike including the instant motian to strike set for 7 hearing on Qetober 24 ZQ20 Althoagh Defendants anticipate the issues set forth in Plaintiffs motion to 28 strike Defendants motion to strike partions of Plaintiffs third amended complaint will have been 2 C7PPOS TION TO PLAINTIFPS MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS