On November 03, 2021 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe, John Vnr,
and
Brown, Eric Lynn,
Does 1-100,
Victor Valley Union High School District,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
l '
\4 \r
CM-015
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT AYTORNEY (Nlml, Sf!!! 80 numbor. Ind lddnn) FOR COURT USE ONLY
_ CRISTINA NOLAN (CA State Bar No. J. 318495)
MANLY, STEWART & FINALDI
19100 Von Karman, Suite 800 F l L E D
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
Irvine, CA 926 2 1
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
TELspHoNE No 949-252-9990 no. (09mm 949-252-9991 m 9AM BERNARDuNo DISTRICT
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Opuonau cnolan@manlystewan.com
AnoaNev FORr~umay Plaintiff JUN 2 6 2023
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
STREET ADDRESS:
MAanvooREss
cmmwcooe
247 West Third Street
247 West Third Street 8V: .e '9 cvm ”um he p ut y
‘
'
—
San Bemardino, CA 92415-0210
BRANCH NAME'
CASE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VLJ Doe
CIVSBZZZ3 63 1
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOE l, et a1. Juoncmomcea.
Brian S. McCarville
DEPT
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE S30
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
1. a. Title: JOHN VNR DOE v. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1.
b. Case number: CIVSBZ l3 1418
Court: same as above
c.
m
D
Department: S l4
other state or federal court (name and address): ( h
E
d.
D E
I
W
v
e.
f.
Case type:
Filing date:
limited
November
civil
3, 2021
unlimited civil probate family law D other (specify): u
1
g.
.3"
Has this case been designated or determined as ”complex?"
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check
D
all
Yes
that apply):
No
v/ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
an'ses from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
involves claims against. title to, possession of. or damages to the same property.
is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources
i. Status ofcase:
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
if heard by different judges.
pending
D
E
dismissed E
disposed of by judgment
with E without prejudice
2. a. Title: JOHN VBK DOE V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ct a1.
Case number: CIVSBZZOO478
c. Court: same as above
d. Department:
E other state or federal coun
S32
(name and address):
Pug. 1 o! 3
‘mm‘1783'uzéfi'd°8‘fifr;k“:° NOTICE 0F RELATED CASE °"
CM-m 5 [an Jury 1, 2007)
“mmiztfigmifi
E CE W E Q
fi 2023
JUN 26
AUFOWA
T 0F C
WER I O R COUR NO DISMCT
S RN ARDI
SAN BE
Document Filed Date
June 29, 2023
Case Filing Date
November 03, 2021
Category
Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
l ' \4 \r CM-015 ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT AYTORNEY (Nlml, Sf!!! 80 numbor. Ind lddnn) FOR COURT USE ONLY _ CRISTINA NOLAN (CA State Bar No. J. 318495) MANLY, STEWART & FINALDI 19100 Von Karman, Suite 800 F l L E D SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA Irvine, CA 926 2 1 COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO TELspHoNE No 949-252-9990 no. (09mm 949-252-9991 m 9AM BERNARDuNo DISTRICT E-MAIL ADDRESS (Opuonau cnolan@manlystewan.com AnoaNev FORr~umay Plaintiff JUN 2 6 2023 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO STREET ADDRESS: MAanvooREss cmmwcooe 247 West Third Street 247 West Third Street 8V: .e '9 cvm ”um he p ut y ‘ ' — San Bemardino, CA 92415-0210 BRANCH NAME' CASE NUMBER PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VLJ Doe CIVSBZZZ3 63 1 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOE l, et a1. Juoncmomcea. Brian S. McCarville DEPT NOTICE OF RELATED CASE S30 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: JOHN VNR DOE v. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. b. Case number: CIVSBZ l3 1418 Court: same as above c. m D Department: S l4 other state or federal court (name and address): ( h E d. D E I W v e. f. Case type: Filing date: limited November civil 3, 2021 unlimited civil probate family law D other (specify): u 1 g. .3" Has this case been designated or determined as ”complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check D all Yes that apply): No v/ involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. an'ses from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against. title to, possession of. or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources i. Status ofcase: D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h if heard by different judges. pending D E dismissed E disposed of by judgment with E without prejudice 2. a. Title: JOHN VBK DOE V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ct a1. Case number: CIVSBZZOO478 c. Court: same as above d. Department: E other state or federal coun S32 (name and address): Pug. 1 o! 3 ‘mm‘1783'uzéfi'd°8‘fifr;k“:° NOTICE 0F RELATED CASE °" CM-m 5 [an Jury 1, 2007) “mmiztfigmifi E CE W E Q fi 2023 JUN 26 AUFOWA T 0F C WER I O R COUR NO DISMCT S RN ARDI SAN BE