On December 04, 2019 a
Request,Application
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lupian, Sigifredo,
and
Gold Star Foods, Inc., A Delaware Corporation,
for Other Employment Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
1 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
MATTHEW MATERN (SBN
‘
J. 159798) sfiElRllaREOIT
2 LAUNA ADOLPH (SBN 227743) COUNTY op SAN BERNARDINO
DEBRA J. TAUGER (SBN 143726) SAN BERNARQNO D!STRICT
3 ELLIE D. GORALNICK (SBN 326276)
4
5
6
7
1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Tel: (310) 531-1900
Facsimile: (310) 531—1901
Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGIFREDO LUPIAN,
individually and on behalf of all other aggrieved
BMW APR
éufiwvfikwk
2‘2 2 0 22
p ty
employees
8
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
1 1
E “-31
££va
12 SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, individually aggi on CASE NO- CIVDSI936613
behalf of all other aggrieved employees, h
13 [Asmgned for all purposes to the Hon. Donald
Plaintiff, Alvarez, Dept. $23]
14
VS, PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
15
NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
GOLD STAR FOODS, INC, a Delaware ORDER IMPOSING ISSUE AND
16 corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST
DEFENDANT GOLD STAR FOODS, INC.
17 Defendants, AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD
[Filed concurrently with Plaintifi’k Motionfor
18
Order Imposing Issue and Monetary
Sanctions; Declarations ofEllz'e D. Goralnick
19
and Debra J. Tauger; Plaintiff’s Separate
Statement]
20
Date: June 13, 2022
21
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept: $23
22
Complaint Filed: December 4, 2019
23
Trial Date: September 12, 2022
24
25
26
27
28
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
:Z‘jgfil‘SSESCfEAz'j): PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
MANHATTAN} BEACH, CA 1
NOTICE
90266
1
Plaintiff Sigifredo Lupian (“Plaintiff”) respectfully requests that the court take judicial
2 notice of the following documents attached as exhibits hereto, submitted in support of Plaintiff’s
3 Motion for Issue and Monetary Sanctions:
4 Exhibit 1: Minute Order granting Plaintiff” s Motion to Compel Further Responses to
5 Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production in Lupian v. Gold Star Foods, Ina, San Bernardino County Case
6 N0. CIVDSl9366 1 3, dated October 6, 2021.
7 Exhibit 2: Minute Order granting Plaintiff s Motion to Compel Further Responses to
8 Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production and modifying the sampling to 15% absent any further showing
9 of good cause in Lupian v. Gold Star Foods, Ina, San Bemardino County Case No.
10 CIVDSl936613, dated November 18, 2021.
11 Upon the request of a party, the court may take judicial notice of “[r]ecords of (1) a court
12 ,
Othis state.” EVid. Code, § 452, subd.(d); Magnolia Square Homeowners Assn. vaafeco Ins. C0.
13 (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 1049, 1056 (“Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d) permits the court
14 t0 take judicial notice of court records.”). Judicial notice is compulsory where a party has given
1 5 sufficient Igotice of the request to enable the adverse party “to prepare to meet the request” and has
16 provided the court “with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice 0f the matter.”
17 Evid. Code, §453.
18 Plaintiff has satisfied these requirements, warranting mandatory judicial notice of Exhibits
19 1 and 2.
20 DATED: April 22, 2022 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
21
22 By:
‘
8&0
,
MATTHEW Jr’MATERN
Worm ~
23 LAUNA ADOLPH
DEBRA J. TAUGER
24 ELLIE D. GORALNICK
Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGIFREDO LUPIAN,
25 individually and on behalf of all other aggrieved
emnlovees
26
27
28
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
”3° “OSECRANS
AVENUE, STE 200
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
2
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA NOTICE
90266
Document Filed Date
April 22, 2022
Case Filing Date
December 04, 2019
Category
Other Employment Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC MATTHEW MATERN (SBN ‘ J. 159798) sfiElRllaREOIT 2 LAUNA ADOLPH (SBN 227743) COUNTY op SAN BERNARDINO DEBRA J. TAUGER (SBN 143726) SAN BERNARQNO D!STRICT 3 ELLIE D. GORALNICK (SBN 326276) 4 5 6 7 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Tel: (310) 531-1900 Facsimile: (310) 531—1901 Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, individually and on behalf of all other aggrieved BMW APR éufiwvfikwk 2‘2 2 0 22 p ty employees 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 1 E “-31 ££va 12 SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, individually aggi on CASE NO- CIVDSI936613 behalf of all other aggrieved employees, h 13 [Asmgned for all purposes to the Hon. Donald Plaintiff, Alvarez, Dept. $23] 14 VS, PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 15 NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR GOLD STAR FOODS, INC, a Delaware ORDER IMPOSING ISSUE AND 16 corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOLD STAR FOODS, INC. 17 Defendants, AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD [Filed concurrently with Plaintifi’k Motionfor 18 Order Imposing Issue and Monetary Sanctions; Declarations ofEllz'e D. Goralnick 19 and Debra J. Tauger; Plaintiff’s Separate Statement] 20 Date: June 13, 2022 21 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: $23 22 Complaint Filed: December 4, 2019 23 Trial Date: September 12, 2022 24 25 26 27 28 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC :Z‘jgfil‘SSESCfEAz'j): PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL MANHATTAN} BEACH, CA 1 NOTICE 90266 1 Plaintiff Sigifredo Lupian (“Plaintiff”) respectfully requests that the court take judicial 2 notice of the following documents attached as exhibits hereto, submitted in support of Plaintiff’s 3 Motion for Issue and Monetary Sanctions: 4 Exhibit 1: Minute Order granting Plaintiff” s Motion to Compel Further Responses to 5 Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production in Lupian v. Gold Star Foods, Ina, San Bernardino County Case 6 N0. CIVDSl9366 1 3, dated October 6, 2021. 7 Exhibit 2: Minute Order granting Plaintiff s Motion to Compel Further Responses to 8 Plaintiff’ s Requests for Production and modifying the sampling to 15% absent any further showing 9 of good cause in Lupian v. Gold Star Foods, Ina, San Bemardino County Case No. 10 CIVDSl936613, dated November 18, 2021. 11 Upon the request of a party, the court may take judicial notice of “[r]ecords of (1) a court 12 , Othis state.” EVid. Code, § 452, subd.(d); Magnolia Square Homeowners Assn. vaafeco Ins. C0. 13 (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 1049, 1056 (“Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d) permits the court 14 t0 take judicial notice of court records.”). Judicial notice is compulsory where a party has given 1 5 sufficient Igotice of the request to enable the adverse party “to prepare to meet the request” and has 16 provided the court “with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice 0f the matter.” 17 Evid. Code, §453. 18 Plaintiff has satisfied these requirements, warranting mandatory judicial notice of Exhibits 19 1 and 2. 20 DATED: April 22, 2022 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC 21 22 By: ‘ 8&0 , MATTHEW Jr’MATERN Worm ~ 23 LAUNA ADOLPH DEBRA J. TAUGER 24 ELLIE D. GORALNICK Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, 25 individually and on behalf of all other aggrieved emnlovees 26 27 28 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC ”3° “OSECRANS AVENUE, STE 200 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 2 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA NOTICE 90266