On March 12, 2019 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ruiz, Alexander,
and
Loma Linda University Medical Center,
Nabil Koudsi, M.D.,
San Antonio Regional Hospital,
Steven Ernst, M.D.,
for Complaint for Medical Malpractice
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
To: 190:97088586‘
Pace: 2 of 4 2021-02-05 22:44:07 GMT 13106340? From: Law Offices of Garv M. Schneider
fl “(m
\
{
.
E.
9 sup
00 qufiJ -Qmm
BERNARDI
NO
SAN aenumnmo CML nmsm n
Gary M. Schneider, Esq. (SBN 72553) FEB 0 0 2021
Nancy Siccama, Esq. (SBN 285800)
LAW OFFICES OF GARY M. SCHNEIDER
12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles. CA 90025-71 11
Telephone: (310) 820—5544
Facsimile: (310)820-6024
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFO
RNIA
IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
1 1
ALEXANDER RUIZ, CASE NO. CIVDS 1907976
12
13 VVVVV
[Assigned for ail purposes to Honorable
Plaintiff,
Judge Thomas S. Garza, in Dept. 827]
14 vs.
NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO
SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL , OF DEFENDANT NABIL KOUDSI, MD.
CENTER, STEVEN ERNST, M.D., NABIL
KOUDSI, MD. and DOES ’1
through 100,
VVVVVVW
Inclusive,
Defendants.
VVV
HONORABLE COURT AND ALL THE PARTIES
TO: THIS
THIS ACTION
IN AND THEIR
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff will not be filing an Opposition to the Motion
for Summary Judgment of Defendant Nabil Koudsi, MD.
Dated: February 2021
5, LAW OFFICES OF GARY M. SCHNEIDER
WWWWW— ARY
Attorney for
. HNEIDER
Plaintiff
1
NOTDCE OF NDNHOPPOSI‘UON T0 MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT
NABIL KOUDSI. M D.
To: 1909708858§ Pane: 3 of 4
V 2021-02-05 22:44:07 GMT 13106340"
\u
From: Law Offices of Garv M. Schneider
PROOF 0F SERVICE~§1013a CODE 0F CIVIL
PROCEDURE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES
am employed in the County of Los Angeles, Stat
l
eighteen (18) and not a part to the e of California. am over the age
of I
y within action; my business
Boulevard. Suite 1100, Los Ange address is 12100 Wilshire
les, California 90025.
On February 5, 2021. served the foregoin
l
g document described NOTICE OF
NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUM
KOUDSI, MD. on the interested parties MAR Y JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT NABIL
,
in this action by placing a true copy thereof
enclosed in a sealed envelope address as
(X?
follows:
PLEASE SEE SERVICE LIST ATTACHED.
10
ll 2g Via Email: caused a true copy of the above describe
l
to the Email addressee(s) list
d document(s) sent via Email
ed on the service list.
l2
Via First Class Mail: caused such envelope to be deposite
I
d in the maii at
Angeles, California. The envelope
was mailed with postage thereon fully prepLos
readily familiar with the firm's prac
tice of collection and processi
aid. am I
l4 maiiing. Under that practice ng correspondence for
it would be
same day with postage thereon fully prepdeposited with the U.8. postal service on that
15 aid at Los Angeles. California in
course of business. am aware that the ordinary
I
on motion of the party served, serv
presumed invalid if postal cancellation ice is
date or postage meter date is mor
l6 day after date of deposit for mailing.
e than one
l7 Via Overnight Delivery: l caused such envelope
to be sent via overnight
service. The envelope was deposited in or with a facility regularl
delivery
18 express service carrier with deli y maintained by the
very fees paid or provided for.
l9 Exe cuted on February 5, 2021, at Los
Angeles, California. declare under penalty
of perjury under the laws of the l
State of California that the abo
2O ve is true and correct.
21
22 mam} 07pm
M. LAM
23
24
25
26
2.7
28
2
NOTICE OF NON OPPOSITION T0
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT
NABIL KOUDSI. M D‘
Document Filed Date
February 05, 2021
Case Filing Date
March 12, 2019
Category
Complaint for Medical Malpractice
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
To: 190:97088586‘ Pace: 2 of 4 2021-02-05 22:44:07 GMT 13106340? From: Law Offices of Garv M. Schneider fl “(m \ { . E. 9 sup 00 qufiJ -Qmm BERNARDI NO SAN aenumnmo CML nmsm n Gary M. Schneider, Esq. (SBN 72553) FEB 0 0 2021 Nancy Siccama, Esq. (SBN 285800) LAW OFFICES OF GARY M. SCHNEIDER 12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100 Los Angeles. CA 90025-71 11 Telephone: (310) 820—5544 Facsimile: (310)820-6024 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFO RNIA IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 1 1 ALEXANDER RUIZ, CASE NO. CIVDS 1907976 12 13 VVVVV [Assigned for ail purposes to Honorable Plaintiff, Judge Thomas S. Garza, in Dept. 827] 14 vs. NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL , OF DEFENDANT NABIL KOUDSI, MD. CENTER, STEVEN ERNST, M.D., NABIL KOUDSI, MD. and DOES ’1 through 100, VVVVVVW Inclusive, Defendants. VVV HONORABLE COURT AND ALL THE PARTIES TO: THIS THIS ACTION IN AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff will not be filing an Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Nabil Koudsi, MD. Dated: February 2021 5, LAW OFFICES OF GARY M. SCHNEIDER WWWWW— ARY Attorney for . HNEIDER Plaintiff 1 NOTDCE OF NDNHOPPOSI‘UON T0 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT NABIL KOUDSI. M D. To: 1909708858§ Pane: 3 of 4 V 2021-02-05 22:44:07 GMT 13106340" \u From: Law Offices of Garv M. Schneider PROOF 0F SERVICE~§1013a CODE 0F CIVIL PROCEDURE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES am employed in the County of Los Angeles, Stat l eighteen (18) and not a part to the e of California. am over the age of I y within action; my business Boulevard. Suite 1100, Los Ange address is 12100 Wilshire les, California 90025. On February 5, 2021. served the foregoin l g document described NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUM KOUDSI, MD. on the interested parties MAR Y JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT NABIL , in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope address as (X? follows: PLEASE SEE SERVICE LIST ATTACHED. 10 ll 2g Via Email: caused a true copy of the above describe l to the Email addressee(s) list d document(s) sent via Email ed on the service list. l2 Via First Class Mail: caused such envelope to be deposite I d in the maii at Angeles, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepLos readily familiar with the firm's prac tice of collection and processi aid. am I l4 maiiing. Under that practice ng correspondence for it would be same day with postage thereon fully prepdeposited with the U.8. postal service on that 15 aid at Los Angeles. California in course of business. am aware that the ordinary I on motion of the party served, serv presumed invalid if postal cancellation ice is date or postage meter date is mor l6 day after date of deposit for mailing. e than one l7 Via Overnight Delivery: l caused such envelope to be sent via overnight service. The envelope was deposited in or with a facility regularl delivery 18 express service carrier with deli y maintained by the very fees paid or provided for. l9 Exe cuted on February 5, 2021, at Los Angeles, California. declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the l State of California that the abo 2O ve is true and correct. 21 22 mam} 07pm M. LAM 23 24 25 26 2.7 28 2 NOTICE OF NON OPPOSITION T0 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT NABIL KOUDSI. M D‘