arrow left
arrow right
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

FpLED S A 1 KJAR McKENNA STOCKALPER LLP COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO SAN BERNAR NO DtSTRICT ROBERT L McKENNA III SBN 166650 2 ALESSA R JONAS SBN 299161 AY 9 2019 7711 Center Avenue Suite 670 3 Huntington Beach CA 92647 4 Telephone No 657 237 7533 Facsimile No 657 7534BY MELISSA WHITE DEPUTY Attorneys for Defendant STEVEN ERNST M D 5 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT 10 11 ALEXANDER RUIZ CASE NO CIVDS 1907976 12 Plaintiff ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 13 vs ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO 14 UDGE WILFRED J SCHNEIDER JR SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT S32 LOMA LINDA LTNIVERSITY MEDICAL 15 CENTER STEVEN ERNST M D NABIL Complaint Filed March 12 2019 Trial Date None Set 16 KOUDSI MD and DOES 1 through 100 Inclusive 17 Defendants 18 19 v 20 COMES NOW Defendant STEVEN ERI ST M D in answering Plaintiff s Complaint 21 on file herein for himself alone and for no other Defendant admits denies and alleges as 22 follows 23 1 Under the provisions of Section 431 30 of the California Code of Civil Procedure 24 this answering Defendant denies both generally and specifically each and every allegation in said 25 complaint and the whole thereof including each and every purported cause of action contained 26 therein and denies that Plaintiff has been damaged in the sum or sums alleged or in any other 27 sum or sums or at all 28 1 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1 2 Further answering Plaintiffs Complaint on file herein and the whole thereof 2 including each and every purported cause of action contained therein this answering Defendant 3 denies that Plaintiff sustained any injury damage or loss if any by reason of any act or omission 4 on the part of this answering Defendant or any agent servant or employee of this answering 5 Defendant 6 AS AND FOR A FIRST SEPARATE DISTINCT AND AFFIRMATIVE 7 DEFENSE THIS ANSWERING DEFENDANT ALLEGES 8 3 That any injury loss or damage purportedly sustained if at all by Plaintiff was 9 directly and proximately caused by the negligence of the Plaintiff and any damages awarded to 10 Plaintiff shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the Plaintiff 11 AS AND FOR A SECOND SEPARATE DISTINCT AND AFFIRMATIVE 12 DEFENSE THIS ANSWERING DEFENDANT ALLEGES 13 4 That the liability of the persons ultimately determined to be responsible for 14 Plaintiff s injuries and losses if any including the Plaintiff shall be compared and the damages 15 if any awarded to Plaintiff shall be apportioned accordingly 16 AS AND FOR A THIRD SEPARATE DISTINCT AND AFFIRMATIVE 17 DEFENSE THIS ANSWERING DEFENDANT ALLEGES 18 5 That all care treatment and procedures rendered to and performed upon Plaintiff 19 was with the express and implied consent of said Plaintiff 20 AS AND FOR A FOURTH SEPARATE DISTINCT AND AFFIRMATIVE 21 DEFENSE THIS ANSWERING DEFENDANT ALLEGES 22 6 That any injury loss or damage purportedly sustained if at all by Plaintiff was 23 directly and proximately caused and contributed to by risks which were fully and actually known 24 to Plaintiff who fully and actually appreciated the nature and scope of the hazards created 25 thereby and said Plaintiff voluntarily assumed said risks and the potential consequences thereof 26 27 28 2 ANSWER TO CONII LAINT