arrow left
arrow right
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • RUIZ-V-SAN ANTONIO Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Jeffery W. Grass, Bar No. 112251 ,3}? pr 5 3,3 a t; * jeffgéDdaVis—ggass.com g" ; ?gfig " lg: ’r " ,‘ i3 CarolA.H0ehn,BarNo. 182131 - :0 choehn@davis—grass.com F i L E DAVIS, GRASS, GOLDSTEIN & FINLAY SUPERIOR COURT OF EA L IFORNIA 3 105 Sedona Court C&SEESASFRADfinIngrsp‘T'RR?cL%O Ontario, California 9 1 764 £11wa (909) 476—2662 (Telephone) (909) 476-2335 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Defendant San Antonlo Reglonal Hospltal . BY QM OCT .0 1 PAULETTE RODRIGUEZ, DEPUTY 2021 \OOONO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER 11 ALEXANDER RUIZ, Case N0.: CIVDS 1907976 12 Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Thomas S. Garza Dept: S27 13 v. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION 14 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 15 CENTER, STEVEN ERNST, M.D., NABIL ADJUDICATION, BY DEFENDANT SAN KOUDSI, M.D. and DOES 1 through 100, ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 16 Inclusive, [Filed concurrently with Memorandum 0f 17 Defendant. Points and Authorities; Declaration ofAllan Tulloch, M.D.; Defendant ’S Separate 18 Statement 0f Undisputed Facts; Defendant ’s Evidence; Proposed Order; Proposed 19 Judgment] 20 December Date: 21, 2021 Time: 9:00 am. 21 Dept: $27 22 MSC Date: None Trial Date: March 7, 2022 23 24 TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: 25 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 21, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., 0r as soon thereafter as 26 the matter be heard in Department S-27 0fthe above—entitled Court, located at 247 West Third Street, 27 San Bernardino, California, defendant San Antonio Regional Hospital will move the Court for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication in favor of defendant San Antonio 28 l DEFENDANT’S NOTICE 0F MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ‘l {N “w z x (‘m ,~ W p, ’ J < “a. a (~ ”y -l 5'1