arrow left
arrow right
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
  • Andras Bago, Alexandru Gerea individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. La Brochette, Inc., Aba KoiunovTorts - Other (New York Labor Law) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/27/2023 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 153644/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/27/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x ANDRAS BAGO and ALEXANDRU GEREA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION - against - Index No. 153644/2023 LA BROCHETTE, INC. and ABA KOIUNOV, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x Jeremiah Iadevaia, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York, hereby affirms under the penalties of perjury that: 1. I am a partner with the law firm of Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, P.C. Plaintiffs Andras Bago (“Bago”) and Alexandru Gerea (“Gerea”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) make this application pursuant to CPLR § 2004 to extend the time to file their motion for class certification until such time as a preliminary conference has been convened, and the Court has set dates to: (i) complete pre-class certification discovery; (ii) for Plaintiffs to move for class certification; and (2) for such other actions that the Court may direct. 2. Defendants La Brochette, Inc. (“La Brochette”) and Aba Koiunov (“Koiunov”) have consented to an extended deadline of October 6, 2023 for Plaintiffs to move for class certification. 3. This action was commenced on or about April 20, 2023 as a class action to recover unpaid minimum wages for labor Plaintiffs furnished for and on behalf of Defendants. 4. A copy of Plaintiff’s Summons and Complaint is attached as Exhibit A. 1300411 v1 1 of 3 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/27/2023 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 153644/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/27/2023 5. Specifically, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of a putative class allege as follows: (i) Defendants misclassified Plaintiffs and members of the putative class as exempt from minimum wage and overtime compensation; and (ii) Defendants failed to provide minimum wages for work performed in violation of N.Y. Labor Law § 650 et seq. and N.Y. Labor Law § 190 et seq., and 12 NYCRR § 146-1.1 et seq.; (iii) Defendants misappropriated gratuities in violation of NY. Labor Law § 196-d; (iv) Defendants failed to pay spread of hours pay in violation of N.Y. Labor Law § 661(3) and other provisions; and (iv) Defendants failed to provide Plaintiffs with accurate statements of wages in violation of N.Y. Labor Law § 195. 6. Pursuant to CPLR § 902, a motion for class certification should be brought “within sixty days after the time to serve a responsive pleading has expired for all persons named as defendants.” 7. “While class certification is an issue that should be determined promptly, a trial court has discretion to extend the deadline upon good cause shown[,] such as the plaintiff's need to conduct class certification discovery to determine whether the prerequisites of a class action set forth in CPLR 901 (a) may be satisfied.” Chavarria v. Crest Hollow Country Club at Woodbury, Inc., 109 A.D.3d 634 (2d Dept. 2013). 8. The time for plaintiffs to move for class certification is left to the discretion of the Court. See Gerard v. Clermont York Assocs. LLC, 143 A.D.3d 478 (1st Dept. 2016). 9. Plaintiffs seek the Court’s permission to extend Plaintiffs’ time to move for class certification to: (1) schedule a preliminary conference with the Court as soon as conveniently possible so that the parties may set forth a pre-class certification discovery schedule; (2) allow reasonable time for all parties to serve and respond to pre-class certification discovery demands; 1300411 v1 2 of 3 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/27/2023 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 153644/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/27/2023 and; (3) to set a Court authorized briefing schedule for the class certification motion, and for any cross-motions that the Defendants may wish to bring. WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that an order be issued granting Plaintiffs’ instant application to adjourn the date to file their motion for class certification until the Court has had an opportunity to set a pre-class certification discovery and briefing schedule. Dated: New York, New York July 27, 2023 VLADECK, RASKIN & CLARK, P.C. By: /s/ Jeremiah Iadevaia Jeremiah Iadevaia 565 Fifth Avenue, 9th Floor New York, New York 10017 (212) 403-7300 jiadevaia@vladeck.com Attorneys for Andras Bago and Alexandru Gerea 1300411 v1 3 of 3