On October 05, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hill, Lisa,
and
Quaid Harley-Davidson, Inc. A California Corporation,
for Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
SCALI RASMUSSEN, PC
Halbert B. Rasmussen, Esq. (SBN 108566)
hrasmussen@scalilaw.com Fei.
SUPER OR
Julie S. Pearson, Esq. (SBN 183043) co OF ORNIA
jpearson@scalilaw.com SAN BY i ‘Oo
800 Wilshire Boulevard. Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: 213.239.5622
OCT 12 2021 .
Facsimile: 213.239.5623 BY
Attoriéys for Défendant and Cross-Cémplainant: :
QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.. a California
corporation
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO :
10
11 ‘LISA HILL;an individual, on behalf of heiselt Case No. CIVDS1826573
the proposed class(es), all other similarly CLASS ACTION
12 situated, and on behalf of the general public, As: igned for All Purposes To:
Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneider
Wo 13 Plaintiff, Dept! $32
5:
14 vs. OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER
OF CROSS-DEFENDANT HARLEY-
15 QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.. a DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC. TO
California corporation: and DOES | through 10. AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT;
— 16 inclusive, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
17 Defendants.
[Filed Separately Concurrently with Cross-
18 Complainant's. Motion to Strike Portions of
QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., a Demurrer and Declaration of Abirami
19 California corporation. Gnanadesi mn. Eyq.: Objection to Request for
Judicial Not and, Evidentiary Objections to
20 Cross-Complainant, Declaration of Abirami Gnanadesigan, Esq.]
21 vs. Date: October 25. 2021
Time: 9:00 a.m.
22 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY.
INC., a Wisconsin corporation, and ROES 1 Complaint Filed: October 5, 2018
23 through 10. inclusive, FAC Filed: March 4, 2019
SAC Filed: May 22. 2019
24 Cross-Defendants.
Cross-Complaint Filed: May 28, 2021
25 FACC Filed: July 29, 2021
Trial Date: None set
26 Cross-Complainant, QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON. INC.. (“Quaid”), respectfully submits
27 the following Opposition to Cross-Defendant HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY,
28 INC.’s Demurrer to the Amended Complaint.
-1-
OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CROSS-DEFENDANT HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY. INC.
lrO AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
00283184.1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 INTRODUCTION 6
3 i ARGUMENT
A Legal Standard
B. The Second Cau: e of Action for Equitable Indemnity i iss Adequately
Plead. .n.ccccee
The Third Cause of Action for press Indemnity is Adequately
Plead seseeeseeeeeee
The First Cause of Action tor Contribution Premised on Comparative
Negligence Is Adequately Plead.. 10
The Fourth Cause of Action for Violation ‘of ‘Vehicle Code
10 §§ 1713. 13 1726 is Adequately Plead. ..... Il
t! The Fifth Cause of Action for Violation of Vehicle Code §24014 (pre-
2019) is Adequately Plead.. 12
5 12
G The Sixth Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Adequately
We 13 Plead.. 13
>:
14 H TheC “ause of Action for Declaratory Relicf is Adequately Plead 15
15 IIL CONCLUSION apressebanesseovecaveuaeenscenseseessetecansuassenenses seesseseseeees 16:
— 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CROSS-DEEENDAN HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY. INC
FO AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
002831844
Document Filed Date
October 12, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 05, 2018
Category
Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SCALI RASMUSSEN, PC Halbert B. Rasmussen, Esq. (SBN 108566) hrasmussen@scalilaw.com Fei. SUPER OR Julie S. Pearson, Esq. (SBN 183043) co OF ORNIA jpearson@scalilaw.com SAN BY i ‘Oo 800 Wilshire Boulevard. Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: 213.239.5622 OCT 12 2021 . Facsimile: 213.239.5623 BY Attoriéys for Défendant and Cross-Cémplainant: : QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.. a California corporation SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO : 10 11 ‘LISA HILL;an individual, on behalf of heiselt Case No. CIVDS1826573 the proposed class(es), all other similarly CLASS ACTION 12 situated, and on behalf of the general public, As: igned for All Purposes To: Judge: Hon. Wilfred J. Schneider Wo 13 Plaintiff, Dept! $32 5: 14 vs. OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CROSS-DEFENDANT HARLEY- 15 QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.. a DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC. TO California corporation: and DOES | through 10. AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT; — 16 inclusive, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 17 Defendants. [Filed Separately Concurrently with Cross- 18 Complainant's. Motion to Strike Portions of QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., a Demurrer and Declaration of Abirami 19 California corporation. Gnanadesi mn. Eyq.: Objection to Request for Judicial Not and, Evidentiary Objections to 20 Cross-Complainant, Declaration of Abirami Gnanadesigan, Esq.] 21 vs. Date: October 25. 2021 Time: 9:00 a.m. 22 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY. INC., a Wisconsin corporation, and ROES 1 Complaint Filed: October 5, 2018 23 through 10. inclusive, FAC Filed: March 4, 2019 SAC Filed: May 22. 2019 24 Cross-Defendants. Cross-Complaint Filed: May 28, 2021 25 FACC Filed: July 29, 2021 Trial Date: None set 26 Cross-Complainant, QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON. INC.. (“Quaid”), respectfully submits 27 the following Opposition to Cross-Defendant HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, 28 INC.’s Demurrer to the Amended Complaint. -1- OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CROSS-DEFENDANT HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY. INC. lrO AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 00283184.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 i ARGUMENT A Legal Standard B. The Second Cau: e of Action for Equitable Indemnity i iss Adequately Plead. .n.ccccee The Third Cause of Action for press Indemnity is Adequately Plead seseeeseeeeeee The First Cause of Action tor Contribution Premised on Comparative Negligence Is Adequately Plead.. 10 The Fourth Cause of Action for Violation ‘of ‘Vehicle Code 10 §§ 1713. 13 1726 is Adequately Plead. ..... Il t! The Fifth Cause of Action for Violation of Vehicle Code §24014 (pre- 2019) is Adequately Plead.. 12 5 12 G The Sixth Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Adequately We 13 Plead.. 13 >: 14 H TheC “ause of Action for Declaratory Relicf is Adequately Plead 15 15 IIL CONCLUSION apressebanesseovecaveuaeenscenseseessetecansuassenenses seesseseseeees 16: — 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CROSS-DEEENDAN HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY. INC FO AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS IN AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 002831844