On December 08, 2016 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.,
Spice Delight, Inc,
Eason, Deborah Antionette,
and
Blm Victorville,
Dollar Tree Stores Inc,
Spice Delight Inc,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
06/18/2021 FRI 9:30 FAx aw SBsc Central I002/017
‘
:
V V 419‘
Q\\
I THOMPSON & COLEGATE LLI’ F l L E D
3610 Fourteenth Street 3%POEURAQ$ 89512; gERcfiklRFafiglA
P. 0. Box 1299
2 SAN neaNARDum mSTRnCT
Riverside, California 92502
3 Tel: (951) 682-5550 JUN 1 8 2021
Fax: (951) 781—4012
4 N
GARY T. MONTGOMERY (SBN 16681 7) BVM’fiCE
ELYZABETH GUM
*
EPUTY
5 mont r m '
I'
w.ne z’
DANIEL C. FAUSTINO (SBN 207553)
6 Wtclgwnet
7
3 Attorneys for Defendants, SPICE DELIGHT, INC, and BLM VICTORVII.,I.,E, a
California Limited Partnership (sued and served as “DOE l”)
9
IO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
H
FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
12
I3
DEBORAH ANTIONE'IVI‘E EASON, CASE NO. CIVDS 1621424
14
Plaintiff, JUDGE: Hon. Thomas Garza/Dept. 827
15
v. DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S
16 OPPOSITION T0 PLAINTIFF’S
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., SPICE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
I7 DELIGHT, INC. and DOES TO 100, 1 RESPONSES T0 FORM AND SPECIAL
Inclusive, INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST
18 FOR ADMISSIONS; DECLARATION OF
Defendants. DANIEL C. FAUSTINO IN SUPPORT
l9 THEREOF
20 TRIAL DATE: 10/13/2020
ACTION FILED: 12/08/2016
21
Hearing: July l, 2021
22 Time‘ 9'00 a m
Dept. $27
23
24 Defendant BLM VICTORVILLE (“Defendant”) hereby submits the following Opposition t0
25 the Motions by Plaintiff, DEBORAH ANTIONETTE EASON (“Plaintiff’) to Compel Further
25 Responses t0 set one of Form Interrogatorics, Special Interrogatories and Request for Admissions, on
27 the following grounds:
28 1. The delay in providing supplemensal responses is due to closures pursuant to health
DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES 'I‘O FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR ADM!SSIONS;
DECLARATION OF DANIEL C. FAUSTINO KN SUPPORT THEREOF
05/18/2021 FRI 9:31 FAx «a SBsc Central Ioo3/017
\r y
and safety orders from national, state, county and municipal agencies relating to the pandemic.
(Defendant BLM Victorville intends on providing further responses, since local and state health and
safety orders recently lified.)
2. Defense counsel has offered Plaintiff continued extensions of her deadline to file
motions to compel, to avoid motions to compel.
3. Finally, Defendant’s objections to plaintiff’s discovery are warranted and are justified.
DATED: June 17, 2021 THOMPSON & C :GATE LLP
9
10 By:
GARY T. MflNTGOMERY
DANIEL C. FAUSTINO
Attorneys for Defendants,
BLM VICTORVILLE; DOLLAR TREE
STORES, INC, SPICE DELIGHT, INC.
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
2
DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES T0 FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS;
DECLARATION 0F DANIEL C. FAUSTINO IN SUPPORT THEREOF
Document Filed Date
June 18, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 08, 2016
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
06/18/2021 FRI 9:30 FAx aw SBsc Central I002/017 ‘ : V V 419‘ Q\\ I THOMPSON & COLEGATE LLI’ F l L E D 3610 Fourteenth Street 3%POEURAQ$ 89512; gERcfiklRFafiglA P. 0. Box 1299 2 SAN neaNARDum mSTRnCT Riverside, California 92502 3 Tel: (951) 682-5550 JUN 1 8 2021 Fax: (951) 781—4012 4 N GARY T. MONTGOMERY (SBN 16681 7) BVM’fiCE ELYZABETH GUM * EPUTY 5 mont r m ' I' w.ne z’ DANIEL C. FAUSTINO (SBN 207553) 6 Wtclgwnet 7 3 Attorneys for Defendants, SPICE DELIGHT, INC, and BLM VICTORVII.,I.,E, a California Limited Partnership (sued and served as “DOE l”) 9 IO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA H FOR THE COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO 12 I3 DEBORAH ANTIONE'IVI‘E EASON, CASE NO. CIVDS 1621424 14 Plaintiff, JUDGE: Hon. Thomas Garza/Dept. 827 15 v. DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S 16 OPPOSITION T0 PLAINTIFF’S DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., SPICE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER I7 DELIGHT, INC. and DOES TO 100, 1 RESPONSES T0 FORM AND SPECIAL Inclusive, INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST 18 FOR ADMISSIONS; DECLARATION OF Defendants. DANIEL C. FAUSTINO IN SUPPORT l9 THEREOF 20 TRIAL DATE: 10/13/2020 ACTION FILED: 12/08/2016 21 Hearing: July l, 2021 22 Time‘ 9'00 a m Dept. $27 23 24 Defendant BLM VICTORVILLE (“Defendant”) hereby submits the following Opposition t0 25 the Motions by Plaintiff, DEBORAH ANTIONETTE EASON (“Plaintiff’) to Compel Further 25 Responses t0 set one of Form Interrogatorics, Special Interrogatories and Request for Admissions, on 27 the following grounds: 28 1. The delay in providing supplemensal responses is due to closures pursuant to health DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES 'I‘O FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR ADM!SSIONS; DECLARATION OF DANIEL C. FAUSTINO KN SUPPORT THEREOF 05/18/2021 FRI 9:31 FAx «a SBsc Central Ioo3/017 \r y and safety orders from national, state, county and municipal agencies relating to the pandemic. (Defendant BLM Victorville intends on providing further responses, since local and state health and safety orders recently lified.) 2. Defense counsel has offered Plaintiff continued extensions of her deadline to file motions to compel, to avoid motions to compel. 3. Finally, Defendant’s objections to plaintiff’s discovery are warranted and are justified. DATED: June 17, 2021 THOMPSON & C :GATE LLP 9 10 By: GARY T. MflNTGOMERY DANIEL C. FAUSTINO Attorneys for Defendants, BLM VICTORVILLE; DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC, SPICE DELIGHT, INC. 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 2 DEFENDANT BLM VICTORVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES T0 FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS; DECLARATION 0F DANIEL C. FAUSTINO IN SUPPORT THEREOF