arrow left
arrow right
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

HLED 3/26/2021 2:20 PM FELICIA PITRE DBTWCTCLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Miranda Lynch DEPUTY CAUSE NO. DC-20-07281 CHAD DIETZ § IN THE DISRICT COURT Plaintif § § V. § 134th JUDICIAL DISTRICT § JOSUE SEGURA AND BOLD STROKE § STUDIOS § § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DEEFENDANTS’ AIVIENDED OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Josue Segura and Bold Stroke Studios, and les this, their Objections to Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Evidence, and respectfully shows the Court the following: I. OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE Defendants object to and respectfully requests that this Court strike the following evidence found in Plaintiff’s appendix to its Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment: A. Exhibit D (a diagnostic test of an Elise Longley) is inadmissible because they have not been authenticated under Tex. R. Evid. 901 or 902. B. Exhibits C and E are Plaintiffs Medical Records. Said documents are inadmissible to show proximate cause. Haygood v. De Escobedo, 365 S.W.3d 390, 397 (Tex. 201 l). Hills v. Donis, No. 14-18-00566-CV, 2020 WL 206187, at *1 (Tex. App—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 14, 2020, no pet. h.); Gunn v. McCoy, 489 S.W.3d 75, 102 (Tex. App—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, affd, 554 S.W.3d 645 (Tex. 2018). Page—1 Obejctions to Summary Judgment Evidence. II. PRAYER For the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request this Court to strike the above named exhibits submitted by Plaintiff in response to Defendants’ Motion for No-EVidence Summary Judgment. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Sergio E. Aleman Sergio State Bar No. 24027275 ALEMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. 4054 McKinney Ave., Ste. 3 1 0 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 373-7774 (Telephone) (214) 764-4035 (Facsimile) sergio@sergioealeman.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served, pursuant to Rule 21a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, on all counsel of record, on the 26th day of March, 2021. /s/ Sergio E. Aleman Sergio E. Aleman Page—2 Obejctions to Summary Judgment Evidence. Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Sergio Aleman on behalf of Sergio Aleman Bar No. 24027275 sergio@sergioealeman.com Envelope ID: 51879892 Status as of 3/26/2021 2:28 PM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Sergio EAleman sergio@sergioealeman.com 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT Francine Ly y@dal|ascourts.org 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT Pete Weise pete@sergioealeman.com 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT Associated Case Party: CHAD DIETZ Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Rocio GosewehrHernandez Rocio@SnellingslnjuryLaw.com 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT Snellings SeNice Service@Snellingsinjurylaw.com 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT Katy Strandlien katy@snellingsinjurylaw.com 3/26/2021 2:20:50 PM SENT