arrow left
arrow right
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • CHAD DIETZ  vs.  JOSUE SEGURA, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-20-07281 CHAD DIETZ § IN THE DISRICT COURT Plaintif § § V. § 134th JUDICIAL DISTRICT § JOSUE SEGURA and BOLD STROKE § STUDIOS L.L.C. § § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER ON DEFENDANTS JOSUE SEGURA AND BOLD STROKE STUDIOS L.L.C.’s NO-EVIDENCE SUMMARY JUDGMENT On the 315‘ of March, 2021 came on to be heard Defendants Josue Segura and Bold Stroke Studios L.L.C.’s Motion for No-EVidence Summary Judgment in the above entitled and numbered cause. The Court proceeded to examine the pleadings, summary judgment proof and considered the arguments of counsel, and made the following ruling: IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Josue Segura Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' negligence claims against Defendant Josue Segura, Individually, are hereby Dismissed. IT IS FURTHER, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Josue Segura Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' negligence per se claims against Defendant Josue Segura, Individually, are hereby Dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Jose Segura’s Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs‘ gross negligence claims and any claims for exemplary damages against Defendant Josue Segura, Individually, are hereby Dismissed. IT IS FURTHER, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Bold Stroke Studio’s L.L.C.’s Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' negligence per se claims against Defendant Bold Stroke Studio’s L.L.C’s are hereby Dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Bold Stroke Studio’s L.L.C.’s Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' gross negligence claims and any claims for exemplary damages against Defendant Bold Stroke Studio’s L.L. C’s are hereby Dismissed. All other relief not expressly granted herein is hereby DENIED. SIGNED this day of March, 2021. JUDGE PRESIDING Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Sergio Aleman on behalf of Sergio Aleman Bar No. 24027275 sergio@sergioealeman.com Envelope ID: 51880161 Status as of 3/26/2021 2:37 PM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Sergio EAleman sergio@sergioealeman.com 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT Francine Ly y@dal|ascourts.org 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT Pete Weise pete@sergioealeman.com 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT Associated Case Party: CHAD DIETZ Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Rocio GosewehrHernandez Rocio@SnellingslnjuryLaw.com 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT Snellings SeNice Service@Snellingsinjurylaw.com 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT Katy Strandlien katy@snellingsinjurylaw.com 3/26/2021 2:24:27 PM SENT