On October 06, 2022 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.,
and
Ibrahim, Ahmad,
for OTHER CONTRACT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC—22-14350
220 ED
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, § IN THE DISTRICT
61pm 55
cogléiéi‘6
LTD, § £51m.
57 P’ r
Plaintiff, § ' ' an, P‘Cr r?”
v. § DALLAS ,
§
AHMAD IBRAHIM dlbln HORIZON § I?
IMAGE, §
De‘rendant § 19aRD JUDICIAL- DISTRICT COURT .. .. a -
DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER
COMES NOW Defendant and generally denies the allegations of Plaintiff’s Original
Petition and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant fiirther affirmatively pleads the purported
agreement is ambiguous; there was never an integrated Offer and acceptance; there was never
delivery of any acceptance of the purported offer or contract; there was never a mirror image
acceptance Of any Offer to create a contract; the purported agreement was nothing more than an
'
agreement to agree; and the purported agreement did not the statute of frauds.
satisfy
Defendant prays that this Court send Plaintiff empty away and that
WHEREFORE,
,5.
Defendant have and recover his costs and fees incurred in defense of this suit. l
Respectfully submitted,
ls/Ahmad Ibrahim
Ahmad Ibrahim
3024 Leesa Drive
Wylie, TX 75098
972—3 02-7238
vangggh800@vahoo.com
DEFENDANT PRO SE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this instrument was served by email on Christine Kirchnerl this 10th
day ofNovemb er, 2022. i
|
ls/Ahmad Ibrahim
Ahmad Ibrahim
DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER Solo Page
Document Filed Date
November 18, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 06, 2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC—22-14350 220 ED SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, § IN THE DISTRICT 61pm 55 cogléiéi‘6 LTD, § £51m. 57 P’ r Plaintiff, § ' ' an, P‘Cr r?” v. § DALLAS , § AHMAD IBRAHIM dlbln HORIZON § I? IMAGE, § De‘rendant § 19aRD JUDICIAL- DISTRICT COURT .. .. a - DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER COMES NOW Defendant and generally denies the allegations of Plaintiff’s Original Petition and demands strict proof thereof. Defendant fiirther affirmatively pleads the purported agreement is ambiguous; there was never an integrated Offer and acceptance; there was never delivery of any acceptance of the purported offer or contract; there was never a mirror image acceptance Of any Offer to create a contract; the purported agreement was nothing more than an ' agreement to agree; and the purported agreement did not the statute of frauds. satisfy Defendant prays that this Court send Plaintiff empty away and that WHEREFORE, ,5. Defendant have and recover his costs and fees incurred in defense of this suit. l Respectfully submitted, ls/Ahmad Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim 3024 Leesa Drive Wylie, TX 75098 972—3 02-7238 vangggh800@vahoo.com DEFENDANT PRO SE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this instrument was served by email on Christine Kirchnerl this 10th day ofNovemb er, 2022. i | ls/Ahmad Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER Solo Page