On May 27, 2022 a
DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION
was filed
involving a dispute between
James Moran,
and
Glenn A. Reiner,
Grand Slam Ventures, Llc,
Jg Real Estate Ventures, Llc,
'John Does' 1-10 Inclusive, The Last Ten Names Being Fictitious And Unknown To Plaintiff,
Jon Steinberg,
for Other Matters - Contract - Other
in the District Court of Nassau County.
Preview
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 0372072023 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 001052/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2023
SUPREME COURT - STATE. OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NASSAU
PRESENT: HON. DAVID P. SULLIVAN,
Supreme Court Justice.
X TAS/TRIAL PART 15
JAMES MORAN,
Plaintiff(s), Index No, 001052/2019
Motion Seq. No. 003
-against- Motion Submitted: 01/12/23
GRAND SLAM VENTURES, LLC, JON
STEINBERG, GLENN A, REINDER, JG REAL
ESTATE VENTURES, LLC and “JOHN DOES”
#1-10 inclusive, the last ten names being fictitious
and unknown to plaintiff,
Defendant(s).
Xx
The following papers were read on this motion:
Motion, Affirmation in Support with Exhibits,
Memorandum of Law........:.::000+
Affirmation in Opposition with Exhibits.
Reply Memorandum of Law...........01.--
Upon the foregoing papers Pro Se Plaintiff James Moran submits‘a motion pursuant to CPLR
§2221(f) for leave to reargue and renew this Court’s prior Decision and Order dated August. 30,
2021, which denied Plaintiffs motion for. summary judgment pursuant.to CPLR §3212 on its
complaint and. granted Defendant Grand Slam Ventures, LLC, et al. the relief it:sought to dismiss
the complaint. The motion is determined as set forth hereinafter.
Motions for leave to reargue-and renew are committed to the sound discretion. of the Court
and are to bé granted only upon a showing that ‘the Court, on the initial motion, overlooked: or
misapprehended the facts or law. Here, the Court perceives.no basis for granting Plaintiff leave to
reargue or renew. Plaintiff has failed-to demonstrate that the Court misapprehended the relevant
Page
| of 2
4+ of 2.
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 0372072023 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 001052/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2023
facts or misapplied any controlling principle of law in ‘dismissing the complaint. McGill v.
Goldman, 261 A.D.2d 593 (2°! Dept. 1991). eltwar 175 A.D.3d 451 (2
Dept. 2019).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff James Moran’s motion pursuant to CPLR
§2221(d) for leave to reargue or renew this Court’s prior Decision and Order is DENIED.
ORDERED that all requests for relief not.addressed herein are DENIED,
This shall constitute the Decision and Order of the Court.
Date: 3 23 ENTER
Mineola, New York
ENTERED
Mar 20 2023
NASSAU COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE
Page 2 of 2
of
Document Filed Date
March 20, 2023
Case Filing Date
May 27, 2022
Category
Other Matters - Contract - Other
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 0372072023 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 001052/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2023 SUPREME COURT - STATE. OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU PRESENT: HON. DAVID P. SULLIVAN, Supreme Court Justice. X TAS/TRIAL PART 15 JAMES MORAN, Plaintiff(s), Index No, 001052/2019 Motion Seq. No. 003 -against- Motion Submitted: 01/12/23 GRAND SLAM VENTURES, LLC, JON STEINBERG, GLENN A, REINDER, JG REAL ESTATE VENTURES, LLC and “JOHN DOES” #1-10 inclusive, the last ten names being fictitious and unknown to plaintiff, Defendant(s). Xx The following papers were read on this motion: Motion, Affirmation in Support with Exhibits, Memorandum of Law........:.::000+ Affirmation in Opposition with Exhibits. Reply Memorandum of Law...........01.-- Upon the foregoing papers Pro Se Plaintiff James Moran submits‘a motion pursuant to CPLR §2221(f) for leave to reargue and renew this Court’s prior Decision and Order dated August. 30, 2021, which denied Plaintiffs motion for. summary judgment pursuant.to CPLR §3212 on its complaint and. granted Defendant Grand Slam Ventures, LLC, et al. the relief it:sought to dismiss the complaint. The motion is determined as set forth hereinafter. Motions for leave to reargue-and renew are committed to the sound discretion. of the Court and are to bé granted only upon a showing that ‘the Court, on the initial motion, overlooked: or misapprehended the facts or law. Here, the Court perceives.no basis for granting Plaintiff leave to reargue or renew. Plaintiff has failed-to demonstrate that the Court misapprehended the relevant Page | of 2 4+ of 2. FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 0372072023 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 001052/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2023 facts or misapplied any controlling principle of law in ‘dismissing the complaint. McGill v. Goldman, 261 A.D.2d 593 (2°! Dept. 1991). eltwar 175 A.D.3d 451 (2 Dept. 2019). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff James Moran’s motion pursuant to CPLR §2221(d) for leave to reargue or renew this Court’s prior Decision and Order is DENIED. ORDERED that all requests for relief not.addressed herein are DENIED, This shall constitute the Decision and Order of the Court. Date: 3 23 ENTER Mineola, New York ENTERED Mar 20 2023 NASSAU COUNTY COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE Page 2 of 2 of