Answer: The Lcf Group, Inc., v. Letzring Inc D/B/A LETZRING, Letz Marine Llc, Northern Alaska Mining Co Llc, Seldovia Bay Waterfront Properties Llc, Port Graham Properties Llc, Lop Llc, Upper Coho Lake Llc, T&L Equipment Inc., Matthew George Letzring
On August 02, 2023 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
The Lcf Group, Inc.,,
and
Letz Marine Llc,
Letzring Inc
D B A Letzring,
Lop Llc,
Matthew George Letzring,
Northern Alaska Mining Co Llc,
Port Graham Properties Llc,
Seldovia Bay Waterfront Properties Llc,
T&L Equipment Inc.,
Upper Coho Lake Llc,
for Special Proceedings - CPLR Article 75
in the District Court of Nassau County.
Preview
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/16/2023 06:29 AM INDEX NO. 612295/2023
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/16/2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NASSAU
---------------------------------------------------------------------x
THE LCF GROUP, INC., INDEX NO.: 612295/2023
Plaintiff,
- against -
VERIFIED ANSWER
LETZRING INC D/B/A LETZRING,
LETZ MARINE LLC, NORTHERN ALASKA MINING CO LLC,
SELDOVIA BAY WATERFRONT PROPERTIES LLC,
PORT GRAHAM PROPERTIES LLC, LOP LLC,
UPPER COHO LAKE LLC, T&L EQUIPMENT INC.,
and MATTHEW GEORGE LETZRING,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------x
Defendants, LETZRING INC D/B/A LETZRING, LETZ MARINE LLC, NORTHERN
ALASKA MINING CO LLC, SELDOVIA BAY WATERFRONT PROPERTIES LLC, PORT
GRAHAM PROPERTIES LLC, LOP LLC, UPPER COHO LAKE LLC, T&L EQUIPMENT
INC., and MATTHEW GEORGE LETZRING, by and through their attorney, Yana
Chechelnitsky, Esq., answer the Verified Complaint of Plaintiff and say:
1. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph “1”.
2. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph “2”.
3. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “3”.
4. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “4”.
5. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “5”.
6. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “6”.
7. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “7”.
8. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “8”.
9. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “9”.
1 of 4
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/16/2023 06:29 AM INDEX NO. 612295/2023
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/16/2023
10. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “10”.
11. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “11”.
12. Defendants make no answer to Paragraph “12”.
13. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “13” that they signed a
contract with Plaintiff and deny the remaining allegations of said paragraph.
14. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph “14”.
15. Defendants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph “15”.
16. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “16” that they signed a
contract with Plaintiff and deny the remaining allegations of said paragraph.
17. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “17” that they signed a
contract with Plaintiff and deny the remaining allegations of said paragraph.
18. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “18” that they signed a
contract with Plaintiff and deny the remaining allegations of said paragraph.
19. Defendants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph “19” that they signed a
contract with Plaintiff and deny the remaining allegations of said paragraph.
20. Defendants admit that they made payments pursuant to the agreement and deny the
remaining allegations of said paragraph.
21. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “21” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
22. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “22” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
23. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “23” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
24 Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “24” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
25. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “25” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
26. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “26” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
2 of 4
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/16/2023 06:29 AM INDEX NO. 612295/2023
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/16/2023
27. Defendants neither admit nor admit the allegations in paragraph “27” and leave
Plaintiff to its proofs.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
28. The Complaint fails to state any cause of action upon which relief can be based.
29. Any Agreement attached to and/or referred to in the Complaint is subject to
rescission because it was entered into by Defendants under economic duress and was not the joint
product of the parties.
30. Any Agreement attached to and/or referred to in the Complaint is a loan regardless
of how it is characterized, and the financial terms contained therein are unconscionable and
therefore unenforceable.
31. Any Agreement attached to and/or referred to in the Complaint is in violation of
Article 8 of the New York Financial Services Law and, as a consequence, Defendants are entitled
to restitution of any money paid to Plaintiff.
32. Any Agreement attached to and/or referred to in the Complaint is in violation of
Article 8 of the New York Financial Services Law and is therefore void ab initio.
33. The financial terms contained in any Agreement attached to and/or referenced in
the Complaint are criminally usurious and therefore unenforceable.
34. Defendants dispute the validity of the amounts claimed by Plaintiff in its various
causes of action.
35. Plaintiff is barred from seeking any damages from Defendants as a result of its
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
36. Plaintiff failed to properly obtain personal jurisdiction over Defendants.
37. The alleged debt has been securitized and therefore Plaintiff lacks standing to bring
this action.
WHEREFORE, Defendants demand that the Verified Petition be dismissed with
prejudice and the costs of this action be assessed against Plaintiff and such further and other relief
as this Court deems just and equitable.
3 of 4
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/16/2023 06:29 AM INDEX NO. 612295/2023
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/16/2023
VERIFICATION
Yana Chechelnitsky, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I am the attorney for Defendants in the within action.
2. Defendants are located in a State other than that in which the undersigned has her
office.
3. I have read the Verified Answer to the Verified Petition and know the contents to
be true to my knowledge except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and as to
those matters I believe them to be true.
Dated: August 16, 2023
NEW YORK, NY
/s/Yana Chechelnitsky
Yana Chechelnitsky, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
305 Broadway, Suite 727
New York, NY 10007
(212) 323-7457
nynj@yanalawoffice.com
TO: Adam J. Feldman, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
3000 Marcus Avenue, Suite 2W15
Lake Success, NY 11042
212-244-4422
ajf@feldmanlegal.com
4 of 4