On August 07, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Remver, Llc,
and
Amsoil Inc.,
Brooks, Brian,
Cowan, Patrick,
Tsg Trinity Security Group Llc,
Tubaiste,
for CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. DC-20-108 1 9
REMVER, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
§
Plaintiff, §
§
V. § 0F DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
§
AMSOIL INC., BRIAN BROOKS, AND §
PATRICK COWAN §
§ 298m JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
Defendants. §
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTE SERVICE OF PROCESS
ON THIS DAY came 0n for consideration the Plaintiff‘s Motion for Substitute Service
Under Rule 106(b), Texas Rules 0f Civil Procedure. It appears t0 the Court that Plaintiff has
attempted but failed t0 personally serve the Defendant, Brian Brooks, at the last known usual place
of abode. It further appears t0 the Court that the manner 0f service ordered herein Will be
reasonably effective t0 give said defendant notice 0f the lawsuit.
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion for
Substitute Service is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the service ofprocess
may be made upon the Defendant, Brian Brooks, either: (1) by leaving a true copy of the citation,
with a copy of the Petition and this Order authorizing substituted service attached, With anyone
over sixteen (16) years 0f age at, 1420 Gleneagle Lane, Frisco, Texas 75034; or (2) by firmly
affixing a true copy of the citation, with a copy of the Petition and this Order authorizing substitute
service attached, t0 the front door 0f Defendant’s last known usual place 0f abode.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the service made by
the above method shall not be deemed perfect unless it also complies With the following
provisions:
(1) a copy 0f the citation, Petition, and this Order shall be mailed by BOTH certified mail,
return receipt requested, AND by regular mail t0 the Defendant at the same address at
Which service is authorized above;
(2) the return 0f service shall not be made until 3O days after mailing 0r until the process
server receives back the green card from the post office, whichever date is earlier;
(3) the return of service shall include a statement setting out the date of mailing as a result
of the mailing by certified mail, and the date of mailing and result of same by regular
mail (i.e., whether the envelope was returned by the post office, the green card came
back signed, etc.); and
(4) a copy 0f any envelope 0r green card returned by the post office shall be attached t0
return of service.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the return 0f service
of the person executing service pursuant t0 this Order shall otherwise be made in accordance With
Rule 107, Texas Rules 0f Civil Procedure.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that service of process
Will be deemed complete upon compliance With this Order, regardless 0f whether Defendant signs
the certified mail receipt.
SIGNED 0n
Emily G. Tobolowsky, Presiding Judge
298th Judicial District Court
Document Filed Date
August 11, 2020
Case Filing Date
August 07, 2020
Category
CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.