arrow left
arrow right
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
  • FRF, Inc., Trail Blazer Builders LLC VS. April Sound Property Owners AssociationOther Civil Case >$200,000 document preview
						
                                

Preview

21-06-07955 FRF, I ISTRICT OURT RAIL LAZER UILDERS, LLC, LAINTIFF ONTGOMERY OUNTY EXAS OUND ROPERTY OUND ROPERTY ISTRICT LAINTIFFS FOR ELIEF FRF, Inc. “(FRF”) and Trail Blazer Builders, LLC (“Trail Blazer”) now move for the Court to grant emergency relief, in support of which they respectfully would show the following. FRF owns lots in the April Sound real estate development. Trail Blazer holds FRF is engaged in the business of assigning equitable interests in the lots it owns, and/or in selling the lots outright, to third parties. Trail Blazer is engaged in the business of building homes on the lots to which it holds equitable interests, which lots transfer to third parties upon completion of construction In order to transfer the real estate with clear title, Plaintiffs must pay the assessments legitimately made by Defendant. There is a four-year statute of limitations on such assessments. FRF has pending agreements to assign and/or sell lots. Trail Blazer has pending agreements to construct homes on and/or transfer lots with completed construction to third It was Defendant’s wrongful and unauthorized refusal to accept Plaintiffs’ assignments that impaired their businesses and caused substantial damages, as described more fully in Plaintiffs’ First Amended .C .P .&R .C §16.004( )(3). See Richard Gill Co. v. Jackson’s Landing Owners’ Asso, 758 S.W.2d 921, 924 (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi 1988). Page party buyers. In order to complete these transactions Plaintiffs must, and wish to, pay all properly pending assessments of Defendant on the subject properties. Plaintiffs have requested Defendant to provide them with accurate and up-to- date statements of any assessments, properly limited to the four-year statute of limitations, on the lots that are the subject of this motion. Defendant has sent assessments not for the proper time period but for many years previous to that. These statements are for assessments that are wholly or partly uncollectible because the statute of limitations has expired. Plaintiffs properly and timely objected to these excessive and improper assessments and repeatedly requested Defendant to provide assessments correctly limited by the statute of limitations, but Defendant has refused and continues to refuse to do so. Defendants’ refusal to present statements for the proper time periods and amounts makes it impossible for Plaintiffs to complete the transactions and meet their obligations to third parties in respect of the tracts at issue. This is creating the risk of immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs, for which money damages will not be a sufficient remedy. Plaintiffs are ready, willing, and able to tender payment for the four-year period that applies, but Defendant refuses to provide them with the amounts owed for that period. Plaintiffs are entitled to receive an order from this Court requiring Defendant to provide statements of assessments limited to the time period set by the statute of limitations, and to accept tenders of payment by Plaintiffs for those amounts. Wherefore, premises considered, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that the Court set this matter for an emergency hearing, and issue an order of emergency relief requiring Defendant to provide statements of assessments limited to the time period set by the statute of limitations, and to accept tenders of payment by Plaintiffs for those amounts, and for such other relief, legal and equitable, as to which Plaintiffs justly may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, Plaintiffs attach a true and correct list of the tracts that are the subject of this motion as Exhibit A hereto. Plaintiffs attach true and correct copies of the assessments at issue as Exhibit B to this motion. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Emergency Relief Page /s/ James J. Burnett James J. Burnett State Bar Number 03426950 The Law Office of James J. Burnett 12002 Pine Brook Drive Stafford7 Texas 77478 Phone: 281.703.9097 Fax: 210.547.7841 jburnett@jamesburnett.com Counsel for Plaintiffs I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff’s motion has been served upon all parties to be served, or their duly authorized agents or counsel of record, in a manner permitted by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, on September 29, 2021. /s/ James J. Burnett James J. Burnett Plaintiffs’ Motion for Emergency Relief Page