On November 12, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Industrial Laminates Corporation,
Jett, Raymond D.,
Jett, Sue E.,
The Sparks Family Living Trust,
and
Wimbish Kelly Constructn, Llc,
for Contract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer
in the District Court of Galveston County.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 20-CV-1704
RAYMOND D. JETT AND SUE E. JETT,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF
THE SPARKS FAMILY LIVING TRUST
\Plaintiffs
mwmmmmmmwmm
V. GALVESTON COUNTY
WIMBISH KELLY CONSTRUCTION; LLC
D/B/A PUTNAM BUILDERS
Defendant 122ND DISTRICT COURT
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ TRADITIONAL AND NO-EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
On this I day of February 2022, came on for consideration Plaintiffs’ Traditional and
R
No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, the
response,=a11 timely filed pleadings and the evidence on the record, this Court is of the opinion
that Plaintiffs’ Traditional and No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgment should, in
/
all things, be DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiffs’
Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is in all things DENIED.
SIGNED, ORDERED, AND ENTERED this H day of fié 2022.
MM
,
ngkABLE JOHN ELLISOR
I
'
TmN\ DconDSJ
Order
aDenying Summary Judgment
"
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIHHII
Document Filed Date
February 14, 2022
Case Filing Date
November 12, 2020
Category
Contract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE NO. 20-CV-1704 RAYMOND D. JETT AND SUE E. JETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE SPARKS FAMILY LIVING TRUST \Plaintiffs mwmmmmmmwmm V. GALVESTON COUNTY WIMBISH KELLY CONSTRUCTION; LLC D/B/A PUTNAM BUILDERS Defendant 122ND DISTRICT COURT ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ TRADITIONAL AND NO-EVIDENCE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this I day of February 2022, came on for consideration Plaintiffs’ Traditional and R No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, the response,=a11 timely filed pleadings and the evidence on the record, this Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ Traditional and No-Evidence Motion For Partial Summary Judgment should, in / all things, be DENIED. IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiffs’ Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is in all things DENIED. SIGNED, ORDERED, AND ENTERED this H day of fié 2022. MM , ngkABLE JOHN ELLISOR I ' TmN\ DconDSJ Order aDenying Summary Judgment " I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIHHII