arrow left
arrow right
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
  • Raymond D. Jett, Individually, Et Al vs. Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam BuildersContract - Debt - Commercial/Consumer document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filed: 11/30/2021 9:53 AM Envelope No. 59541737 CAUSE NO. 20-CV-1704 RAYMOND D. JETT AND SUE E. JETT, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE § OF THE SPARKS FAMILY LIVING TRUST § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS § WIMBISH KELLY CONSTRUCTION, LLC § D/B/A PUTNAM BUILDERS § § Defendant. § 122nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ TRADITIONAL AND NO-EVIDENCE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this date came on for consideration the Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs, Raymond D. Jett and Sue E. Jett, Individually and as Trustee of the Sparks Family Living Trust (“Plaintiffs”), against Defendants, Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC d/b/a Putnam Builders (“Putnam”), Industrial Laminates Corporation d/b/a Ilcor Builders (“Ilcor”), and Ilcor Homes, Inc. (“Ilcor Homes” and, collectively with Putnam and Ilcor, “Defendants”). The Court, after considering the Motion, the pleadings, the evidence, the responses thereto, and the argument of counsel, finds that said Motion should in all respects be granted. It is therefore, ORDERED that the Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs against Defendants is in all things GRANTED. It is therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ affirmative defenses of accord and satisfaction, estoppel, and laches fail as a matter of law and are hereby dismissed. Page 1 of 2 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment 578311v.1 S7201/00001 SIGNED this ______ day of________________, 2021. _________________________________ HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING Page 2 of 2 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment 578311v.1 S7201/00001 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Minh Nguyen on behalf of Kendall Valenti Bar No. 24077954 mnguyen@cjmlaw.com Envelope ID: 59541737 Status as of 11/30/2021 9:56 AM CST Associated Case Party: The Sparks Family Living Trust Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Kendall V.Speer kspeer@cjmhlaw.com 11/30/2021 9:53:26 AM SENT Minh X.Nguyen mnguyen@cjmlaw.com 11/30/2021 9:53:26 AM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Josephine Ybarra jybarra@cphattorneys.com 11/30/2021 9:53:26 AM SENT Karla Strickland kstrickland@cphattorneys.com 11/30/2021 9:53:26 AM SENT Associated Case Party: Wimbish Kelly Construction, LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status David Gregory Harris 24029600 dharris@cphattorneys.com 11/30/2021 9:53:26 AM SENT