arrow left
arrow right
  • INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, INC.  vs.  GABRIELA ESPINOZA, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, INC.  vs.  GABRIELA ESPINOZA, et alCNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

N0. DC-19-06955 INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS * INC. In the District Court V. 298th Judicial District GABRIELA ESPINOZA a/k/a GABRIELA MARTINEZ and JORGE ********* L. ESPINOZA TORRES a/k/a JORGE ESPINOZA TORRES a/k/a JORGE E. TORRES a/k/a JORGE ESPINOZA a/k/a JORGE TORRES Dallas County, Texas ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS Plaintiff’s Motions for Sanctions due t0 Non—Service and for Frivolous Pleadings contained Within Plaintiff’s Response t0 Defendants’ Request for Findings of Fact and Conclusions 0f Law and Motion for Sanctions and Plaintiff’s Objections, Motion for Sanctions and Response t0 Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing for Lack 0f Standing came 0n for hearing. The Court examined affidavits and other papers filed in support thereof and in response thereto; heard argument of counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants; the Court being of the opinion that the motions should be denied. IT IS ORDERED that both Plaintiff’s Motions for Sanctions due to Non- Service and for Frivolous Pleadings contained Within Plaintiff’ s Response to Defendants’ Request for Findings 0f Fact and Conclusions of Law and Motion for Sanctions and Plaintiff’s Objections, Motion for Sanctions and Response t0 Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment t0 a Take Nothing for Lack 0f Standing are hereby DENIED. SIGNED on October , 2020. JUDGE PRESIDING Order Denying Sanctions - Page 1 of 1