On May 15, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Investment Retrievers, Inc.,
and
Espinoza, Gabriela,
Espinoza Torres, Jorge L,
for CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
CAUSE N0..'1”)C-19—06955
INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, .INC., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Plaintiff, §
§
vs.
§
GABRIELA ESPINOZA AKA GABRIELA § 298th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
MARTINEZ AND JORGE L ESPINOZA
.
_
§
TORRES AKA JORGE ESPINOZA §
TORRES AKA JORGE E TORRES AKA §
JORGE ESPINOZA AKA JORGE §
TORRES, .
§ DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGMENT TO A TAKE
NOTHING JUDGMENT FOR LACK OF STANDING
,
‘ Came on to be heard Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing
Judgement to a Take Nothing Judgment for Lack of Standing. The Court having taken judicial
notice of its file, considering the pleadings, evidence and arguments 0f counsel is 0f the opinion
that Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing Judgement Should be DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADIUDGED that:
Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing Judgment for Lack of Standing 1s
DENIED 1n all respects
WM
mA
SIGNED on H 2020
mm
.
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY'JUDGMENT SOLO PAGE
Document Filed Date
October 19, 2020
Case Filing Date
May 15, 2019
Category
CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CAUSE N0..'1”)C-19—06955 INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, .INC., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, § § vs. § GABRIELA ESPINOZA AKA GABRIELA § 298th JUDICIAL DISTRICT MARTINEZ AND JORGE L ESPINOZA . _ § TORRES AKA JORGE ESPINOZA § TORRES AKA JORGE E TORRES AKA § JORGE ESPINOZA AKA JORGE § TORRES, . § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGMENT TO A TAKE NOTHING JUDGMENT FOR LACK OF STANDING , ‘ Came on to be heard Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing Judgement to a Take Nothing Judgment for Lack of Standing. The Court having taken judicial notice of its file, considering the pleadings, evidence and arguments 0f counsel is 0f the opinion that Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing Judgement Should be DENIED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADIUDGED that: Defendants’ Motion to Modify Judgment to a Take Nothing Judgment for Lack of Standing 1s DENIED 1n all respects WM mA SIGNED on H 2020 mm . ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY'JUDGMENT SOLO PAGE