On August 18, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dennis-Hill, Donna Lynn,
Hill Iii, Charles Anthony,
and
Does 1-10,
Zuniga, Antonio,
for Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
(JX’I’
t
‘1’?”
William O. Woodland, Esq., Bar N0. 175 103
FORD, WALKER, HAGGERTY & BEHAR SUPERIORFCLEUlfiTEF gLIFORgm
One World Trade Center CQESEESSAEAQNBEngDIm
Twenty-Seventh Floor
Long Beach, California 90831-2700 FEB 2 4, 2021.
(562) 983-2500
\OOONaUl-bwmp—n
Attorneys for Defendant, v
ANTONIO ZUNIGA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CHARLES ANTHONY HILL, III and DONNA ) Case No. CIVD82016910
LYNN DENle—HILL, )
)
JUDGE DONALD ALVAREz
Plaintiffs, )
DEPT. $23
)
VS.
REPLY 1N SUPPORT 0F MOTION T0
3
ANTONIO ZUNIGA and DOES 1 through 10, STAY DISCOVERY AND/OR FOR A
)
PROTECTIVE ORDER As T0 DEFENDANT
)
Defendants. ANTONIO ZUNIGA
)
NNNNNNNNNHr—a—ty—aHHy—Ab—Ir—dp—
Date: March 3, 2021
g
Time: 9:00 a.m.
)
Dept: $23
WNONMAWNHOOOONONM-bWNP‘O
)
)
Action Filed: 8/18/20
)
Trial: None
)
Defendant, ANTONIO ZUNIGA (“Defendant”) submits the following Reply in support of his
motion for an Order staying discovery in this matter as to Defendant Zuniga and/or for a protective order
limiting discovery in whole 0r in part as t0 Defendant. However, Defendant asks that discovery proceed
as to the claims of Plaintiffs.
///
///
1
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND/OR FOR A PROTECTIVE
ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT ANTONIO ZUNIGA
no
n
ifi m
am
4 d, c
9
m
Em©
m
m
3 n
1Qm
3 mm
3 p
9g m
flm
.
A m
1mm N
mc O
0m a
8 a N
.
2
0 w
4g
. m
m :
5
émm r
c
Document Filed Date
February 24, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 18, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
(JX’I’ t ‘1’?” William O. Woodland, Esq., Bar N0. 175 103 FORD, WALKER, HAGGERTY & BEHAR SUPERIORFCLEUlfiTEF gLIFORgm One World Trade Center CQESEESSAEAQNBEngDIm Twenty-Seventh Floor Long Beach, California 90831-2700 FEB 2 4, 2021. (562) 983-2500 \OOONaUl-bwmp—n Attorneys for Defendant, v ANTONIO ZUNIGA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CHARLES ANTHONY HILL, III and DONNA ) Case No. CIVD82016910 LYNN DENle—HILL, ) ) JUDGE DONALD ALVAREz Plaintiffs, ) DEPT. $23 ) VS. REPLY 1N SUPPORT 0F MOTION T0 3 ANTONIO ZUNIGA and DOES 1 through 10, STAY DISCOVERY AND/OR FOR A ) PROTECTIVE ORDER As T0 DEFENDANT ) Defendants. ANTONIO ZUNIGA ) NNNNNNNNNHr—a—ty—aHHy—Ab—Ir—dp— Date: March 3, 2021 g Time: 9:00 a.m. ) Dept: $23 WNONMAWNHOOOONONM-bWNP‘O ) ) Action Filed: 8/18/20 ) Trial: None ) Defendant, ANTONIO ZUNIGA (“Defendant”) submits the following Reply in support of his motion for an Order staying discovery in this matter as to Defendant Zuniga and/or for a protective order limiting discovery in whole 0r in part as t0 Defendant. However, Defendant asks that discovery proceed as to the claims of Plaintiffs. /// /// 1 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND/OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT ANTONIO ZUNIGA no n ifi m am 4 d, c 9 m Em© m m 3 n 1Qm 3 mm 3 p 9g m flm . A m 1mm N mc O 0m a 8 a N . 2 0 w 4g . m m : 5 émm r c