arrow left
arrow right
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
  • IPWE, INC, et al vs. LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC, et alOTHER CONTRACT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 4/25/2022 2:11 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Kellie Juricek DEPUTY CAUSE NO. DC-20-07067 IPWE, INC. and ERICH § IN THE DISTRICT COURT SPANGENBERG, § § § Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, § § V. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § § LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, § INC., AND WENDY DIAMOND, § § § Defendants/Counter—Plaintiffs. § 95TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF UNDISCLOSED THEORIES OF RECOVERY Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Lucky Diamond Productions, Inc. and Wendy Diamond (collectively, “Defendants”), file this Response to Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants IPwe, Inc. and Erich Spangenberg’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Exclude Evidence of Undisclosed Theories of Recovery, and state as follows: ARGUMENT There is no live issue for the Court to decide. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendants / Counter-Plaintiffs have disclosed they are seeking three forms of relief: (1) attorneys’ fees related to Plaintiffs’ breach of the Senior Advisor Board Agreement (the “Advisor Agreement”); (2) $300,000 under a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”); and shares of IPwe stock equaling a three percent (3%) equity interest in IPwe as of January 27, 2020 under a Chairwoman Agreement (the “Chairwoman Agreement”). Because Defendants are seeking only these three forms of relief, Plaintiffs’ motion is moot. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Evidence of Undisclosed Theories of Recovery-Page 1 As Defendants informed the Court, they are not seeking money damages related to breach of the Chairwoman Agreement; nor do they seek money damages related to their other claims concerning the Chairwoman Agreement. Rather, Defendants only seek shares of stock in the amount of 3% of IPwe as of January 27, 2020, in connection With all of its claims related to the Chairwoman Agreement—specifically for breach of the Chairwoman Agreement, fraud in connection with the Chairwoman Agreement, as well as quantum meruit and unjust enrichment concerning the Chairwoman Agreement. To the extent Plaintiffs are arguing that Defendants are not permitted to seek 3% shares for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment, they are far from meeting the legal standard. There is no unfair surprise or unfair prejudice here, where—as Plaintiffs acknowledge—Defendants have sought those 3% shares since their First Amended Answer in August 2021, and Defendants specifically disclosed the method of calculating that measure of damages in their Second Amended Responses to Request for Disclosures in November 2021. See In re Staff Care Ina, 422 S.W.3d 876, 882 (Tex. App—Dallas 2014) (recognizing that Rule 193’s exclusionary provisions do not apply when there is “lack of unfair surprise or unfair prejudice”). CONCLUSION Plaintiffs’ Motion is moot because Defendants are only seeking the three forms of relief set forth above. Moreover, because there is no unfair surprise or unfair prejudice here, there is no basis to prohibit Defendants from presenting their claim to 3% of IPwe stock in connection with any of their claims. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Evidence of Undisclosed Theories of Recovery-Page 2 Dated: April 25, 2022 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brandon V. Lewis Brandon V. Lewis State Bar No. 24060165 blewis@reidcollins.com REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4200 Dallas, Texas 75201 T: (214) 420-8900 F: (214) 420-8909 Lisa S. Tsai State Bar No. 24046999 ltsai@reidcollins.com REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP 1301 S. Capital of Texas Hwy. Building C, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 T: (512) 647-6100 F: (512)647-6129 Jeffrey M. Tillotson Texas Bar No. 20039200 jtillotson@tillotsonlaw.com Jonathan R. Patton State Bar N0. 24088198 jpatton@tillotsonlaw.com TILLOTSON LAW 1807 Ross Avenue, Suite 325 Dallas, Texas 75201 T: (214)382-3041 F: (214) 292-6564 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS/COUNTER—PLAINTIFFS LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC. AND WENDY DIAMOND Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Evidence of Undisclosed Theories of Recovery-Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by hand- delivery to counsel herein on April 25, 2022. /s/ Brandon V. Lewis Brandon V. Lewis Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Evidence of Undisclosed Theories of Recovery-Page 4 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Jodie Wingerter on behalf of Brandon Lewis Bar No. 24060165 jwingerter@reidcollins.com Envelope ID: 63873736 Status as of 4/25/2022 2:17 PM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Lisa STsai |tsai@rctlegal.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Brandon Lewis 24060165 blewis@rctlegal.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Susie Wade swade@ti||otsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Kira Lytle klytle@tillotsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Benjamin Nabors bnabors@tillotsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Enrique Ramirez eramirez@tillotsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Jodie Wingerter jwingerter@reidco||ins.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Associated Case Party: LUCKY DIAMOND PRODUCTIONS, INC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Jeffrey MTillotson jtillotson@tillotsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Jonathan RPatton jpatton@tillotsonlaw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Joseph Alrrobali airrobali@ti||otson|aw.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT EFiling Admin efiling@roggedunngroup.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Associated Case Party: ERICH SPANGENBERG Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Alan York ayork@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Shikendra Rhea srhea@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Steve Smith Stevesmith@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Alicia Nixon anixon@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Mark L.Johansen mjohansen@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Julie A.Hardin jhardin@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Jodie Wingerter on behalf of Brandon Lewis Bar No. 24060165 jwingerter@reidcollins.com Envelope ID: 63873736 Status as of 4/25/2022 2:17 PM CST Associated Case Party: IPWE, INC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Alicia Nixon anixon@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:1 1 :04 PM SENT Steve Smith Stevesmith@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Shikendra Rhea srhea@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Julie A.Hardin jhardin@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Erich Spangenberg erich@ipwe.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Mark L.Johansen mjohansen@reedsmith.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT Associated Case Party: WENDY DIAMOND Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status EFiling Admin efiling@roggedunngroup.com 4/25/2022 2:11:04 PM SENT