arrow left
arrow right
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
  • T.H. Trust vs Robert G Pate and Judy K PateOther Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

NO. 17-DCV-243655 DAVID H. HAMILTON, AS TRUSTEE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF T. H. TRUST § Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, § V 434TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ROBERT G. PATE AND JUDY K. PATE Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs, V. GEORGE M. BISHOP § OF FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS Cross-Defendant, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENTER ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO ASSOCIATE JUDGE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Defendants, Robert G. Pate and Judy K. Pate, Movants herein, and bring this Motion to Enter Order Denying Objection to Associate Judge. In support hereof, Movants show the following: I George M. Bishop, acting then as attorney for David Hamilton, trustee of TH Trust, Plaintiff herein, filed this suit in 2017. Between 2017 and January 2021 Bishop, on his own behalf and in representing Hamilton, appeared on multiple occasions before Honorable John Hawkins, then associate judge of this court. The associate judge made numerous rulings which were accepted by Bishop and Hamilton. 0 On March 22, 2021, Bishop and Hamilton both appeared before Judge Argie Brame and learned of her appointment as associate judge in this case. I. On March 22, 2021, at a video hearing at which both Bishop and Hamilton were present, Judge Brame advised Bishop and Hamilton that she would hear Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Iv. In order to be timely, an objection to the associate judge must have been filed by April 1, 2021, ten days after Bishop was informed by Judge Brame that she would hear the Motion for Summary Judgment. Vv On April 14, 2021, Bishop filed his Objection to Referral to Associate Judge, complaining that he had not been notified of an appointment of an associate judge in this case and requested that a hearing scheduled for April 19, 2021 be heard by the presiding judge of this court. VI. Texas Government Code section 54a.106 provides that a party must file an objection to an associate judge hearing a trial on the merits or presiding at a jury trial not later than the 10th day after the date the party receives notice that the associate judge will hear the summary judgment motion. VIL. Further, the Government code only provides that an objection may be made as to a hearing on a trial on the merits or presiding over a jury trial. There is no provision for an objection to an associate judge hearing a motion for sanctions or a motion to exclude evidence as demanded by Bishop. VII. At a hearing on Bishop’s Motion on April 21 2021, the Court heard the motion and the argument of counsel, and orally denied the Motion. IX. WHEREFORE, Defendants request that the court enter a written denial of the objection of Bishop to the referral to the associate judge in the form attached to this motion. Respectfully submitted, THE By Russell C. Jones Texas Bar No. 10954300 Email: rjones@jonesattorneys.com 407 Julie Rivers Drive Sugar Land, TX 77478 Tel. (281) 242-8100 Fax. (281) 242-7474 Attorney for Defendants Robert G. Pate and Judy K. Pate CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on May % 2021 a true and correct copy of Defendants’ Motion to Enter Judgment was served on Jeffrey R. Vaughan and George M. Bishop electronically through the electronic filing manager. Limhl EN Russell C. Jones