On July 25, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
T.H. Trust,
and
Pate, Judy K,
Pate, Robert G,
for Other Civil
in the District Court of Fort Bend County.
Preview
NO. 17-DCV-243655
DAVID H. HAMILTON, AS TRUSTEE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
OF T. H. TRUST §
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, §
V 434TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ROBERT G. PATE AND JUDY K. PATE
Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs,
V.
GEORGE M. BISHOP § OF FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS
Cross-Defendant,
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENTER ORDER DENYING
OBJECTION TO ASSOCIATE JUDGE
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COME Defendants, Robert G. Pate and Judy K. Pate, Movants herein, and bring
this Motion to Enter Order Denying Objection to Associate Judge. In support hereof, Movants
show the following:
I
George M. Bishop, acting then as attorney for David Hamilton, trustee of TH Trust,
Plaintiff herein, filed this suit in 2017.
Between 2017 and January 2021 Bishop, on his own behalf and in representing Hamilton,
appeared on multiple occasions before Honorable John Hawkins, then associate judge of this
court. The associate judge made numerous rulings which were accepted by Bishop and
Hamilton.
0
On March 22, 2021, Bishop and Hamilton both appeared before Judge Argie Brame and
learned of her appointment as associate judge in this case.
I.
On March 22, 2021, at a video hearing at which both Bishop and Hamilton were present,
Judge Brame advised Bishop and Hamilton that she would hear Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment.
Iv.
In order to be timely, an objection to the associate judge must have been filed by April 1,
2021, ten days after Bishop was informed by Judge Brame that she would hear the Motion for
Summary Judgment.
Vv
On April 14, 2021, Bishop filed his Objection to Referral to Associate Judge,
complaining that he had not been notified of an appointment of an associate judge in this case
and requested that a hearing scheduled for April 19, 2021 be heard by the presiding judge of this
court.
VI.
Texas Government Code section 54a.106 provides that a party must file an objection to
an associate judge hearing a trial on the merits or presiding at a jury trial not later than the 10th
day after the date the party receives notice that the associate judge will hear the summary
judgment motion.
VIL.
Further, the Government code only provides that an objection may be made as to a
hearing on a trial on the merits or presiding over a jury trial. There is no provision for an
objection to an associate judge hearing a motion for sanctions or a motion to exclude evidence as
demanded by Bishop.
VII.
At a hearing on Bishop’s Motion on April 21 2021, the Court heard the motion
and the argument of counsel, and orally denied the Motion.
IX.
WHEREFORE, Defendants request that the court enter a written denial of the objection
of Bishop to the referral to the associate judge in the form attached to this motion.
Respectfully submitted,
THE
By
Russell C. Jones
Texas Bar No. 10954300
Email: rjones@jonesattorneys.com
407 Julie Rivers Drive
Sugar Land, TX 77478
Tel. (281) 242-8100
Fax. (281) 242-7474
Attorney for Defendants
Robert G. Pate and Judy K. Pate
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on May % 2021 a true and correct copy of Defendants’ Motion to Enter
Judgment was served on Jeffrey R. Vaughan and George M. Bishop electronically through the
electronic filing manager.
Limhl EN
Russell C. Jones
Document Filed Date
May 28, 2021
Case Filing Date
July 25, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.