arrow left
arrow right
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
  • Surjit Bagga vs. City National Bank26 Unlimited - Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

E-FILED   G. Andrew Slater  #238126  12/22/16  1  DOV/LING  AARON  !" INCORPORATED # FRESNO $!%SUPERIOR COUNTY $ COURT$! &&North 8080 ' (Palm )*+, Avenue, !( Floor Third # ''  2 '/ P.O. Box 0& 28902 12K. By: - 2  Deputy .Garrett, , " 034 1 a #5', Fresno, Califomia 67'6 08020& 937 29 -8902  J (559) <=<&& Tel:9:0; ! 432-4500 #Fax: (559) <2<0& /9:0; 432-4590 < 4 5 >' 6 aslater@dowlingaaron. '?') com  5 Attorneys for "7 '157'  Defendants 5  !% CITY ! NATIONAL . BANK 6 8 7  8 $ $! SUPERIOR COURT # OF #, CALIFORNIA, $!% COI-INTY OF # # FRESNO  0 9 ! CENTRAL "@ DIVISION  & 10 11 $A!, SURJIT BAGGA, Case 5'  No. 16CECG03336 t2 Plaintiff, 6 677, ! POINTS " AND $!B! AUTHORITIES IN $ SUPPORT !#OF "#"! DEFENDANT !% CITY  @ V ! NATIONAL .C BANK'S "D$ DEMURRER ! TO 13 !B THE D COMPLAINT!&# $A! OF SURJIT BAGGA < CITY ! !% NATIONAL BANK; .and " DOES1-100, 2 &&, T4 $ INCLUSIVE,@, 9 #E+ "Date: 18,& February7,2017 8  15 !6)9 3:30 3) Time: 9& p.m. "7  Defendant.  "3 Dept:9 <& 402  T6 A+9 Judge: B' Jeffrey B Hon. A771 )6 Hamilton ' 8 T7 18 l90 & 20 2I  22  23 < 24  25  26 8 27 DowLrNclAARoSS "0FG&9HHIGCJKKLG ! POINTS " AND $!B! A  $ IN SUPPORT OF "#"! !# DEFENDÄNT CITY ! !% NATIONAL .CBANK'S  "D$ DEMURRER ! !BD TO THE !# COMPLAINT $A! OF'SURJIT BAGGA ! TABLE #!! OF CONTENTS  I  Page 2 I. $DD% SUMMARY 1 a J II.  #! FACTS "$D AND CIRCUMSTANCES!  1  4 ru.  STANDING LEGAL !"# FOR "D$ DEMURRER..  6 5 IV. $D! 8 ARGUMENT............ 7  A. !( First  The #65 +5'7 Cause of ? 6'Alleged Action !( In The ')3 6 Complaint, ,7' '7+ for'Wrongful  6 #'? '5+,#Fails Foreclosure, 6 5!' To State#Facts ? +7M?6 5Sufficient !' '5 6 To Constitute+  +5 A Cause 7 ? 6'Against Of Action  65  8 CNB.  7 7  B. !( ?'Cause The Second +5'7 of ? 6'Alleged Action   !(')3 In The 6 Complaint, ,7' for 8  6?,#Fails Negligence, 6 !'State#Facts 5To ? +7M?6 5Sufficient !' To '5 6 + Constitute Cause A +5 7Action Of ? 6' 65 Against  0 CNB.  9 9  C. !(!(6 The Third Cause +5'7 ? 6'Alleged of Action In!( The ')3 6 Complaint, ,for 7' & 10  6?B66 Negligence Hiring Supervision, and +3*656',Fails # 6 !'StateFacts 5To # ? +7M?6 5Sufficient  !'Constitute To '5 6 + ACause +57 Of ? 6' Action 65 Against  CNB......... &  10 11 " D !(#'+ The Fourth(and#67  Fifth(Causes '7Action +55of ? 6'  Alleged !(')3 In The 6 Complaint, , t2 for  7' 6 Negligent D6535 Misrepresentation Fraud, 6'and # +,#Fail 6 !' To State#Facts ? 5 +7M?6 Sufficient !' To '5 6 + Constitute  +557 Causes ? 6' Of Action 65 Against  CNB.  10&  13  E. !(Sixth The 6/ ( +5'7 Cause of ? 6'Alleged Action In !(')3 The 6 Complaint, ,7'@6' 6' for Violation < T4 7 Of !( The '5 ( Rosenthal #Fair "E 6Debt ' ? 6'Practices Collection  ? 6?5? Act,,#Fails 6 !'State 5To # ? Facts +7M?6 5Sufficient !& To '5 6 + Constitute  +57 A Cause Of ? 6' Action 65 Against  CNB. .....   T2  15 # F !( * The Seventh ( +5'7 Cause of ? 6'Alleged Action  !(')3 In The 6 Complaint, ,7' for t6 @6' 6'7 Violation +5655 Of Business '7556'5' And Professions ? Code Section 8&&etseq., 6'17200 5N, 5!' #Fails 6 # ? To StateFacts +7M?6 5Sufficient !' To '5 6 + Constitute  +57 A Cause Of ? 6' Action t78  65 Against  CNB. ...13   18 G.  ")+ Demurrer ('+ Should  +5 6 ('+ 6Without Be Sustained  Leave*to') Amend. ...14<  0 T9 V. '? +56' Conclusion ...14< & 20 2l  22  23 < 24  25  26 8 27 "G DOWLINGIAARONc) .Ã’ i 6 ! POINTS " AND $!B! AUTHORITIES $ IN SUPPORT!# "#"!!% OF'DEF'ENDANT CITY ! NATIONAL .C BANK'S "D$!THE DEMURRERTO !BD !OF COMPLAINT $A! #SURJIT BAGGA 1 ! TABLE # OF $!B! AUTHORITIES 2 (Page ^J Cases 55 O1 Ankeny v. '?O( *Lockheed D6556 5P Missiles 3 & Space?& Co. 4 :(1979) 88  080; 33 Cal.App.3d s31 ............... 8 7 +E1* Aubry !626 v. TrïCity 1B'53 Hosp. "65 Dist. 5 00; :(1992) 2 CaL (0 < th962 ..........,.. 8 7 6 O* .6 Blankv. Kirwan : 0;0 (1985)  39 Cal.3d3II  8 7 7 Castaneda 5  v. /'D' * Saxon Servs., Mortg. , 8 687 # +33 F. Supp. 0 ,&&0:" 2d1t9t,2009 &&0;.12 (E.D. Cal.2009).  8 ' 65* Collins ' "7 v. Power + Default Servs., *5,? Inc. :"  (N.D.Cal. AJan. <,&  14,2010) No. &0=< &;' 09-4838 ,& SC,2010 &U.S. $ "65 Q Dist.LEXIS 3361,  , 9 & 2010  &WL <0&, 234902, atR *3 .........  T2  & 10 '))6 Committee ' (6 L ! on Children's *656',Inc. Television, General #''5 v.  ? * Foods '3' Corporation6' : 0; (1983) 35 Cal.3d 08 197 ...........  11 '))'  Commonwealth (D'  Mortgage 55+ Assurance?' +36''+ * Superior Co. v. Court  00; :(1989) 211 33& Cal.App.3d 508 .......6   12 #65( Fisher v. San * 'Peninsula Pedro 65+ B'536 Hospital  :  <  33 0& t4< &0;2t4 CaI.App.3d 590  (1089)  13 #' 1* Foley v.   ? " 6*Data Interactive '3 Corp. l4< : (10; 988) <8 47   Cat3d < 6s4 ........... < T4  Garcia ?6 *+3 v. Sup.Ct. (State'7  : ; of Cal.)  15 00&;& :(1990) 50 Cal.3d 8 728 ........... ..........78 'S Gonzalez S*First # v. #65 O ' 6Loan Franklin Servs., *5, t6 ' No. 9&02@2&&0< 1:09-CV-00941 = ,& AWI-GSA,2010 &$ U.S. Dist.Q "65 LEXIS1.657,2010 8,&  &WL <<,at 144862, R8 *7 :" (E.D. Cal.AJan. ,& &;..12,13  11,2010)... ,  t78 + 6 Guardion ' North(Bay, 1,? Inc. +36''+ v. Superior * Court(Myers) :D15;  18 (200 ;0< :&& 1) 94  33< Cal.App (0 .4th 963 .....6  B6 HeintzS* v. AO65 Jenkins t90 :  00;s14 (199s) <U.S. $ 0  29r...........  12 B6 HeritagePacific #6 ?6 ?676?Financial, , LLC *v. D''1 Monroy & 20 :& ; (2013)   215  CaL 33 App. < 4th(08, 008 972,997   21 . Keenv. Am. B') * ) Home D' Servicing,Inc., Mortg. *6?6,?, 664F. +33 <# Supp. &,&&0$ 2d 1086,2009 U.S."65 Q Dist.LEXIS 100803, &&&,&&0  2009 WL &<<, 3380454,  22 atR *5 :" &&0; (E.D. CaL.2009) ....13 .('+1 Khoury v. D * 1C5'7 Maly's of Calíþrnia, 67'6 ,? Inc.  23 :(1993) 00; 14< 33< Cal.App.4th (6t2  .. < T4 .Kwilrset 6O5 '3 Corp. * +36''+ v. Superior Court  < 24 (2011);5rCal. < th  & (310...........  :& 13   25 Ladd * County1'7 v. '+ of SanD Mateo' :  < 00;12 Cal.4fh (1996) (0  913 ........... 0 9   26 Lambert )E * '+ ('+ v. Southern County  1Gas 5' Co. : 0; (19s2)  52   <8 Cal.2d347 ........... ........6  8 27 Lazar S * +36''+ v. Superior Court  : 00; (1996)  12  Cal.< ( th 631 ........... &, 11 ... 10,  28 " DOWLINGIAARON ii66 ! POINTS " AND $!B! AUTIIORITIES  $ IN SUPPORT OF "#"! !# DEFENDANT !% !.C CITY NATIONAL BANK'S "D$ DEMURRER ! TO !B THE D !OF COMPLÄINT $A! &#SURJIT BAGGA D6 Medina* 72+ v. Safe-Guard Products, '+? 5,Internat.,   ,Inc. ? 1 :&&; (2008) < 64 Cal.App.4th 33< & (105 8 7 2 D SE Metzenbaum v. D +)* SE Metzenbaum +) :(1948) 86  0<; 338& Cal.App.2d750 .......