Preview
MC-030
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
LAW OFFICES OF PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C.
Raymond A. Patenaude (#128855) / Stephanie J. Boone (#160182) / Carolyn S. Elliott (#335870)
Kaden D. Byron (#333158) / Nathalia A. Aguirre (#337628) /Alison K. Schlick (#303871)
9619 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92123
TELEPHONE N0.: (858) 244-7600 FAX No. (Optional): (858) 836-03 1 8
F L E D
l
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Carolyn.EIIiott@pandf.us
SUCPOEURNIOT$
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF 89$; gERCSALI'RFDO'sg'A
SAN BERNARDINQ D'STRICT
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
STREET ADDRESS: AUG 2 5 2022
MAILING ADDRESS: 247WEST 3RD STREET
CITY STATE AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDINO CA 92415-0210
BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: TD BANK USA, N.A. WW“me
DEFENDANT(S)/RESPONDENT: HEIDI N RAYO,
DECLARATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT 0F COSTS CASE NUMBER
[c.c.P. 1033]
CIVSB21 17961
The undersigned declare as follows:
1. |am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all Courts in the State of California. Further, | am an
associate with the Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. attorney of record for Plaintiff herein.
2. If called to testify as a witness thereon, | could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated in this
declaration, except as to those matters testified to upon information and belief, and as to those matters, believe |
them to be true.
3. Prior to the commencement of this action, and as part of our usual course of business, we caused to be mailed to
the Defendant(s) a letter pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1033(b)(2).
4. A true and correct copy of the letter which is attached hereto.
l declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: August 11,
[X] CAROLYN s.
2022
ELLIOTT [
(TYPE
] KADEN D. BYRON
OR PRINT NAME)
X E
Attorney for
X (SIGNATURE 0F DECLARANT)
Plaintiff D Petitioner D Defendant
D Respondent D Other (Specify):
F°m‘ Ad°med f°r Optima' use
Judicial Council of California
DECLARATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS [C.C.P. 1033] Page 1 of 1
MC-030 [Rev. January 1, 2006]
CA_46A Dec Reimbursement Costs P&F File No‘ 20-41070
LAW OFFICES OF
PATENAUDE &- FELIX A. P. C.
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATIOfi
4545 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, 3RD FLOOR, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
TEL: (858) 244-7600 OR (800) 832-7675 FAX: (858) 836-0318 WEBSITE: WWWPANDF‘US
|
|
ARIZONA LOS ANGELES NEVADA NEW MEXICO OREGON PENNSYLVAN IA WASHIN GTON
3260 NORTH HAYDEN RD 6800 OWENSMOUTH AVE. 7271 w. CHARLESTON MENAUL BLVD, NE
8500 1618 sw 15‘ AVE, 501 CORPORATE DRIVE 19401 40th AVE, WEST
SUITE #1 o7 SUITE #290 BLVD, sunE #1 oo smTE #A-3 13 SUITE #205 SOUTHPOINTE, SUITE #205 SUITE #280
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251 CANOGA PARK, CA 91303 LAS VEGAS, NV s91 17 ALBUQUERQUE, NM s71 12 PORTLAND, 0R 97201 CANONSBURG, PA 15317 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036
TEL: (soc) 832.7675 TEL: (866) 784-8084 TEL: (702) 952-2032 TEL: (800) 832-7675 TEL: (503) 208—2676 TEL; (412) 429-7675 TEL, (425) 361-1662
FAX: (480) 247-2783 FAX: (81 8) 906—7944 (800) 867-3092 FAX; (s58) 836-03 18 (800) 832-7675 (866) 772-7675 (800) 832-7675
FAX: (702) 992-6286 FAX: (503) 954—3586 FAX: (412) 429—7679 FAX; (425) 967-3 508
June 16, 2020
1159025/1252718
HEIDI N RAYO
177 W SOUTH ST APT 206
RIALTO CA 92376-6461
RE: Our Client: TD BANK USA, N.A. / TARGET CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT (2050-24)
Original Creditor: TD Bank USA, N.A. / Target Credit Card Account
Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXX0804
Our File Number: 20-41070
Balance Due: $1,178.42
Dear Heidi N Rayo:
Please be advised that the above-referenced debt has been assigned to this firm to initiate collection efforts
regarding your delinquent outstanding balance to our client. You can contact our office at 800-832-7675 ext.
8300.
In the event that legal action is pursued and judgment is ultimately obtained against you, the judgment may
include all court costs in addition to the principal amount currently owed.
Unless you notify this office within THIRTY (30) days of receiving this notice that you dispute the validity of this
debt, or any portion thereof, this office will assume this debt is valid. If you notify this office in writing within
THIRTY (30) days of receiving this notice that this debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, this office will obtain
verification 0f the debt, or a copy of a judgment against you, and mail you a copy of such verification or
judgment. Further, if you make a written request upon this office within THIRTY (30) days ofreceiving this
notice, this office will provide you with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current
creditor.
This is an attempt t0 collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
Very truly yours,
LAW OFFICE OF PATENAUDE & FELIX
ADAM MICHAEL RIVERA, ESQ.
THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR
This is an attempt to collect a debt, and any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION
PRPF03 P&F File No. 20—41070
Related Content
in San Bernardino County
Case
Print
Jul 15, 2024 |
Wilfred J Schneider, Jr.
|
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422674
Case
Capital One N.a. -v- Verdin Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
. TBD |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422834
Case
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-03604
23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez
Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted
Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the
court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0051944
S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged
Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,
default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker,
Deram K
Ruling
PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC VS. CHRISTINA RANGEL ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC17559532
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 1. PLAINTIFF PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC's HEARING ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTION. Continued to August 6, 2024 on the court's motion. =(302/CK)
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES
Jul 27, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300997
DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300997
CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CV-23-006622
CV-23-006622 – DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL – Plaintiff Discover Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and unopposed.
The Court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the answer and complaint filed in this case. The answer admits all allegations in the complaint as true and does not assert any affirmative defenses.
Based on the pleadings, the Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against the defendant, and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(A).) Defendant, who did not oppose this motion, has not given the Court any reason to grant leave to amend. (Cf. Today's IV, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 1137, 1176, reh'g denied (Oct. 25, 2022), review denied (Jan. 18, 2023).)
Consequently, the unopposed motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court will sign the proposed order and the proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff. Court trial date to be vacated.
Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.
Ruling
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. Castro
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CVG-00362
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., VS. CASTRO
Case Number: 23CVG-00362
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Terminating Sanctions: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. moves
for terminating sanctions by striking Defendant Vincent Castro’s answer. Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the
amount of $1,572.75 for each motion.
Procedural Defect: As a procedural matter, this motion was served both via mail and email on May 9, 2024, and
set for a hearing date of June 7, 2024. CCP § 1005(b) requires all moving papers be served 16 court days before
the hearing. This notice period is extended by five calendar days if the motion is served by mail. Id. For service
by email, the notice period is extended by two court days. CCP § 1010.6(a)(3). This timeframe is calculated by
counting backwards from the hearing date but excluding the hearing date. CCP § 12c.
Starting with the June 7, 2024, hearing date and counting backwards 16 court days (excluding the Court holiday
of May 27, 2024) then five calendar days for out of state mailing this matter should have been served by mail no
later than, May 4, 2024. For email the last day to serve the motion was April 24, 2024. The motion was served
on May 7, 2024, and was untimely under either calculation. Based on insufficient statutory notice, the motion is
denied.
Merits of Motion: Even if the motion had been timely noticed, terminating sanctions are not warranted.
Terminating sanctions are a “drastic penalty and should be used sparingly.” Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract
Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 604. A terminating sanction should not generally be
imposed by the court until less severe sanctions have been attempted and were unsuccessful. Id. No justification
has been provided as to why terminating sanctions are appropriate in this context instead of lesser evidentiary or
issue sanctions. Without additional evidence, terminating sanctions would be premature.
The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the
denial.
Review Hearing: This matter is also on calendar for review regarding trial re-setting. The Court designates this
matter as a Plan II case and intends on setting it for trial no later than October 15, 2024. An appearance is
necessary on today’s calendar to discuss available trial dates.
Ruling
Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
23CV-0201860
ET AL.
Case Number: 23CV-0201860
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff and
Plaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20,
2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff and
Counsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctions
have not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would not
be effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate
Order of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
******************************************************************************
9:00 a.m. Review Hearings
******************************************************************************
Ruling
Sierra Central Credit Union vs. Goodwin
Jul 23, 2024 |
23CVG-00253
SIERRA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION VS. GOODWIN
Case Number: 23CVG-00253
This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement
informing the Court that the stay is still in effect. The matter is continued to Tuesday, January 23, 2025 at 9:00
a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Martinez Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
Tanada, Stephanie |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422781
Document
Bank Of America N.a. -v- Robledo Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Stephanie Thornton-Harris |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422569
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Preview
MC-030 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY LAW OFFICES OF PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. Raymond A. Patenaude (#128855) / Stephanie J. Boone (#160182) / Carolyn S. Elliott (#335870) Kaden D. Byron (#333158) / Nathalia A. Aguirre (#337628) /Alison K. Schlick (#303871) 9619 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92123 TELEPHONE N0.: (858) 244-7600 FAX No. (Optional): (858) 836-03 1 8 F L E D l E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Carolyn.EIIiott@pandf.us SUCPOEURNIOT$ ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF 89$; gERCSALI'RFDO'sg'A SAN BERNARDINQ D'STRICT SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO STREET ADDRESS: AUG 2 5 2022 MAILING ADDRESS: 247WEST 3RD STREET CITY STATE AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDINO CA 92415-0210 BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: TD BANK USA, N.A. WW“me DEFENDANT(S)/RESPONDENT: HEIDI N RAYO, DECLARATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT 0F COSTS CASE NUMBER [c.c.P. 1033] CIVSB21 17961 The undersigned declare as follows: 1. |am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all Courts in the State of California. Further, | am an associate with the Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. attorney of record for Plaintiff herein. 2. If called to testify as a witness thereon, | could and would competently testify as to all the facts stated in this declaration, except as to those matters testified to upon information and belief, and as to those matters, believe | them to be true. 3. Prior to the commencement of this action, and as part of our usual course of business, we caused to be mailed to the Defendant(s) a letter pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1033(b)(2). 4. A true and correct copy of the letter which is attached hereto. l declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: August 11, [X] CAROLYN s. 2022 ELLIOTT [ (TYPE ] KADEN D. BYRON OR PRINT NAME) X E Attorney for X (SIGNATURE 0F DECLARANT) Plaintiff D Petitioner D Defendant D Respondent D Other (Specify): F°m‘ Ad°med f°r Optima' use Judicial Council of California DECLARATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS [C.C.P. 1033] Page 1 of 1 MC-030 [Rev. January 1, 2006] CA_46A Dec Reimbursement Costs P&F File No‘ 20-41070 LAW OFFICES OF PATENAUDE &- FELIX A. P. C. A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATIOfi 4545 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, 3RD FLOOR, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 TEL: (858) 244-7600 OR (800) 832-7675 FAX: (858) 836-0318 WEBSITE: WWWPANDF‘US | | ARIZONA LOS ANGELES NEVADA NEW MEXICO OREGON PENNSYLVAN IA WASHIN GTON 3260 NORTH HAYDEN RD 6800 OWENSMOUTH AVE. 7271 w. CHARLESTON MENAUL BLVD, NE 8500 1618 sw 15‘ AVE, 501 CORPORATE DRIVE 19401 40th AVE, WEST SUITE #1 o7 SUITE #290 BLVD, sunE #1 oo smTE #A-3 13 SUITE #205 SOUTHPOINTE, SUITE #205 SUITE #280 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251 CANOGA PARK, CA 91303 LAS VEGAS, NV s91 17 ALBUQUERQUE, NM s71 12 PORTLAND, 0R 97201 CANONSBURG, PA 15317 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 TEL: (soc) 832.7675 TEL: (866) 784-8084 TEL: (702) 952-2032 TEL: (800) 832-7675 TEL: (503) 208—2676 TEL; (412) 429-7675 TEL, (425) 361-1662 FAX: (480) 247-2783 FAX: (81 8) 906—7944 (800) 867-3092 FAX; (s58) 836-03 18 (800) 832-7675 (866) 772-7675 (800) 832-7675 FAX: (702) 992-6286 FAX: (503) 954—3586 FAX: (412) 429—7679 FAX; (425) 967-3 508 June 16, 2020 1159025/1252718 HEIDI N RAYO 177 W SOUTH ST APT 206 RIALTO CA 92376-6461 RE: Our Client: TD BANK USA, N.A. / TARGET CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT (2050-24) Original Creditor: TD Bank USA, N.A. / Target Credit Card Account Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXX0804 Our File Number: 20-41070 Balance Due: $1,178.42 Dear Heidi N Rayo: Please be advised that the above-referenced debt has been assigned to this firm to initiate collection efforts regarding your delinquent outstanding balance to our client. You can contact our office at 800-832-7675 ext. 8300. In the event that legal action is pursued and judgment is ultimately obtained against you, the judgment may include all court costs in addition to the principal amount currently owed. Unless you notify this office within THIRTY (30) days of receiving this notice that you dispute the validity of this debt, or any portion thereof, this office will assume this debt is valid. If you notify this office in writing within THIRTY (30) days of receiving this notice that this debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, this office will obtain verification 0f the debt, or a copy of a judgment against you, and mail you a copy of such verification or judgment. Further, if you make a written request upon this office within THIRTY (30) days ofreceiving this notice, this office will provide you with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor. This is an attempt t0 collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICE OF PATENAUDE & FELIX ADAM MICHAEL RIVERA, ESQ. THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR This is an attempt to collect a debt, and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION PRPF03 P&F File No. 20—41070