arrow left
arrow right
  • HARDY et al -v- RIOS, DVM et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • HARDY et al -v- RIOS, DVM et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • HARDY et al -v- RIOS, DVM et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • HARDY et al -v- RIOS, DVM et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

George M. Wallace —- Cal. Bar No. 101472 WALLACE, BROWN & SCHWARTZ Marengo Avenue "2f? 1r ng?h 001- SUPERI ORFCJgUiFE-TEFEALIFORNW1 Pasgdena, California 91 101-1 504 CSXEEESfifiNE‘Sfifi“? ( 62 ) 844—6777;Fax ( 626 ) 795-0353 DEC 01 2021 Attorne s GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., for Defendants \OOONQUI-hUJNh-A and A IMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC (\ m“ BY gifll‘g Q! S! (Zn Tv NTHIA BELLAMY, DE ;E - SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ILLYA HARDY, an individual; Case No.: CIV DS 2002744 JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, an individual; TOPLINE K9 SERVICES, Unlimited Jurisdiction - Claim Exceeds $25,000 Plaintiffs, [Assignedfor allpurposes t0 Dept. S28] vs. Com taint Filed: Januar 27, 2020 Tria Date: Decem er 13, 2021 GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., an Individual; ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC; NNNNNNHHHHn—tn—dr—Ah—IHH and DOES 1— 50, inclusive, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RE LAY Defendants. OPINION TESTIMONY BY LAY WITNESSES. AND RE PERSONAL UIAUJNHOKOOOQO‘xm-AWNHO PREFERENCE TESTIMONY BY EXPERT WITNESSES [Motion #3 of 4] Defendants GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., and ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, and each of them, hereby move the Court in limine at the time of Trial for the following ruling and instructions t0 the plaintiffs: §E13r‘m C ma. :5, ’ Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence re Lay Opinion, and re “Personal Preferences” of Expert Witnesses [Motion #3 of 4] - 1