On January 27, 2020 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hardy, Illya,
Hardy, Johanna Barlund,
Topline K9 Services,
and
Animal Emergency Clinic,
Rios, Dvm, Grace,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
George M. Wallace —- Cal. Bar No. 101472
WALLACE, BROWN & SCHWARTZ
Marengo Avenue
"2f?
1r
ng?h
001- SUPERI ORFCJgUiFE-TEFEALIFORNW1
Pasgdena, California 91 101-1 504 CSXEEESfifiNE‘Sfifi“?
( 62 ) 844—6777;Fax ( 626 ) 795-0353
DEC 01 2021
Attorne s GRACE RIOS, D.V.M.,
for Defendants
\OOONQUI-hUJNh-A
and A IMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC (\ m“
BY gifll‘g Q! S! (Zn
Tv
NTHIA BELLAMY, DE ;E -
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ILLYA HARDY, an individual; Case No.: CIV DS 2002744
JOHANNA BARLUND HARDY, an
individual; TOPLINE K9 SERVICES, Unlimited Jurisdiction - Claim
Exceeds $25,000
Plaintiffs, [Assignedfor allpurposes t0 Dept. S28]
vs. Com taint Filed: Januar 27, 2020
Tria Date: Decem er 13, 2021
GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., an Individual;
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC;
NNNNNNHHHHn—tn—dr—Ah—IHH
and DOES 1— 50, inclusive, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RE LAY
Defendants. OPINION TESTIMONY BY LAY
WITNESSES. AND RE PERSONAL
UIAUJNHOKOOOQO‘xm-AWNHO
PREFERENCE TESTIMONY BY
EXPERT WITNESSES
[Motion #3 of 4]
Defendants GRACE RIOS, D.V.M., and ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC,
and each of them, hereby move the Court in limine at the time of Trial for the
following ruling and instructions t0 the plaintiffs:
§E13r‘m
C ma. :5,
’
Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence re Lay Opinion, and re
“Personal Preferences” of Expert Witnesses [Motion #3 of 4] - 1
Document Filed Date
December 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
January 27, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.