Document for Larsen, Sherry vs. Placer Valley Sports Complex

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER



  Date: September 27, 2022                                  Time: 8:30AM
  Judge:   Trisha Hirashima                                 Dept.:   Department 40
  Reporter:                                                 Clerk:
                                                                4 U/p          LOcATOORID


Larsen, Sherry vs. Placer Valley Sports Complex            Stunry          Larsen K Present TT



                                                           Robert Sinclair Pg present A
[_] And related Cross Action(s)                             Case # S-CV-0045659         (Teas)

                                             Law and Motion Minutes

Proceedings RE:    Motion: Compel -

L] Dropped.                [_] Continued to____      [_] by Plaintiff [] by Defendant
                                                                 _] by Stipulation (] by Court
4 Matter argued and submitted.
_] Submitted on points and authorities without [_] argument [_] appearance.
] Motion/Petition granted.         [_] Motion/Petition denied.
(] Demurrer [1] sustained [] overruled [] without [] with leave to _] amend [] answer.
_] Counsel appointed for:
(_] Taken under submission.
_] Debtor is sworn and retired with counsel for examination.
CO Stipulation to [_]Judge Pro Tem      [_]commissioner executed in open court.
(J Counsel for          to prepare the written order and submit it to opposing counsel for approval as
  aEMoeae          oa    re       court   SmKes         responsive          Dourments            dua   yA loft (aa
ie               4 modifies it to                       SNE -Doceunents Must
                                                                          be produced wrtnin &
                 Casonaole
(_] The tentative ruling is
                                UMovurt of time.
                        adopted as the ruling of the court,      to wit:




                           NON NU
                                  -_                                                                          >

     Plaintiff            is     advised            that       the    notice            of     motion         must           include           notice     of


the        court’s         tentative               ruling           procedures.                (Local         Rule        20.2.3(c).)




Plaintiff’s                Motion           to     Compel           Requests            for     Production               of     Documents,              Set

Two




All        moving        papers          and       supporting              papers            shall      be     served           and       filed     at


least        16     court         days        before           the    hearing.                (Code     Civ.           Proc.,        §    1005,     subd.

(b).)        The     notice            period            is    increased           by        five      calendar              days        when     service

is    by     mail.             (Ibid.)        Plaintiff's                 motion         was        served         with        insufficient


notice.            However,            as     defendant              is    willing            to     waive         the       procedural

defects,            the        motion         to     compel          is    granted.             Defendant               Placer           Valley

Sports        Complex             is     ordered              to    serve        verified            responses               and     responsive

documents            to        requests            for        production,           set         two,     no        later        than       October


11,        2022.




Plaintiff’s                request            for        sanctions           is    denied.             The     notice           of       motion     fails

to     identify            the     person,               party,       or     attorney              against             whom     sanctions           are

sought,            and     fails         to      state         the    statutory               basis          for       the


request.            Additionally,                    plaintiff              is    not        entitled          to       discovery               sanctions

as     a    self-represented                       litigant.               (Code    Civ.            Proc.,         §    2023.040;               Argaman

v.     Ratan        (2d        Dist.        1999)         73       Cal.App.4th               1173,      1179;           Kravitz           v.     Superior

Court         (2d    Dist.         2001)            91    Cal.App.4th              1015,            1021.)