Party Discovery: Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1    Todd A. Jones (Bar No. 198024)
     tjones(@archemorris.com
2    Gregory K. Federico (Bar No. 242184)
     gfederico(@archemorris.com
3    ARCHER NORRIS
     A Professional Law Corporation
4    301 University Avenue, Suite 110
     Sacramento, Califomia 95825-5537
5    Telephone:     916.646.2480
     Facsimile:     916.646.5696                                   ';y Tony d m , DepuN Clerk
6
     Attomeys for Defendants and Cross-Defendants
7    RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, individually, and
     dba CA CONSTRUCTION
8
                                        SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
9
                                          COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
10

11
     RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE                    CaseNo. 07AS04450
12   ABBOTT,
                                                     DEFENDANTS RICHARD KIRK
13                        Plaintiffs,                RUYBALID, individually, and dba CA
                                                     CONSTRUCTION'S PROPOSED
14                                                   DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF BRYAN
                                                     HILL; OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS'
15   RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI, et al.                   REQUESTED TESTIMONY OF BRYAN
                                                     HILL
16                        Defendants.
                                                     Trial:     January 18, 2011
17                                                   Time:      9:00 a.m.
                                                     Dept.:     43
18
                                                     Action Filed: September 24, 2007
19
     AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.
20

21            Defendant RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, individually, and dba CA CONSTRUCTION

22   (hereinafter "CA CONSTRUCTION") hereby intends to introduce the following testimony from

23   the deposition of Bryan Hill:

24            Pages: Line

25            10: 6-7

26            24: 11-21

27            26: 5-7

28            28: 20-22
     NIC341/I080190-1

      CA CONSTRUCTION'S PROPOSED TESTIMONY/OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED TESTIMONY OF HILL
1            29: 1-4

2            35: 4-6

3            37: 18-22

4            44: 19-22

5            46: 12-17

6            47:14-25

7            48: 1-6

8            50: 10-19

9             51: 10-20

10            68:12-25

11            69: 1-22

12            71: 14-20

13            87:17-23

14

15            Defendant CA Construction hereby objects to the following testimony from the deposition

16   of Bryan Hill which Plaintiffs intend to introduce at trial:
17            Page: Line
18            26:20           OBJECTION: RELEVANCE, Evidence Code Section 350
19            47:6-48:9       OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION
20            49:1-52:1
21                      50:2-9 OBJECTION: HEARSAY (double hearsay); LACK OF FOUNDATION;
                               ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE
22
              52:10-54:1:     OBJECTION: HEARSAY; LACK OF FOUNDATION; RELEVANCE
23
              58:25 - 75:23
24
                        59    OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION; RELEVANCE
25
                        60    OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION
26
                        61    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE
27
                        62    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE
28
     N1C341/1080190-1

      CA CONSTRUCTION'S PROPOSED TESTIMONY/OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED TESTIMONY OF HILL
1                       63    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE

2                       64    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

3                       66    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE

4                       67    OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION

5             76:24-82:6:

6                       76:   OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

7             83:1-99:15:

8                       83    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

9                       84    OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION

10                      86    OBJECTION: LACK OF FOUNDATION

11                      87    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

12                      96    OBJECTION: SPECULATION; LACK OF FOUNDATION

13                      99    OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

14            101:4-103:23:

15                      103:16-20   OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION

16            109:21-112:10:

17                      112         OBJECTION: SPECULATION; LACK OF FOUNDATION

18            113:3-117:4:

19                      117          OBJECTION: SPECULATION; LACK OF FOUNDATION

20            119:1-122:4

21                      119          OBJECTION: RELEVANCE

22            127:3-128:15:          OBJECTION: RELEVANCE; LACK OF FOUNDATION;
                                     SPECULATION.
23

24
              Since Plaintiffs have referenced large sections ofthe deposition to be read at a single time,
25
     CA CONSTRUCTION requests that it be allowed to interpose objections during the course of
26
     Plaintiffs' reading the proposed testimony at the areas referenced above, and for the Court to mle
27
     on the objections upon being made.
28
     NIC341/1080190-1                                   1

      CA CONSTRUCTION'S PROPOSED TESTIMONY/OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED TESTIMONY OF HILL
1    Dated: January 23,2011                        ARCHER NORRIS
2

3
                                                   Todd A.Jones
4                                                  Gregory K. Federico
                                                   Attomeys for Defendants and Cross-
5                                                  Defendants RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID,
                                                   individually, and dba CA CONSTRUCTION
6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NIC341/1080190-1

      CA CONSTRUCTION'S PROPOSED TESTIMONY/OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED TESTIMONY OF HILL