On September 24, 2007 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
for (Breach of Contract/Warranty)
in the District Court of Sacramento County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
720 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-1380
http://www.saccourt.ca.gov
NOTICE TO FILING PARTY - RETURNED DOCUMENTS
Case Title: Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al
Case Number: 07AS04450
We are unable to process the attached papers for the reasons indicated below:
Document Rejected: Acknolwledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment and your check #37956 - Date in
section 5a is incorrect as judgment was entered on 2/3/2011 (costs were posted to the judgment on
6/6/11). No notary acknowledgement is attached as required. There is no indication on drop sheet or
check submitted for what the check is to be used for.
It is the responsibility of the filing party to review any applicable statute, California Rules of Court,
California Code of Civil Procedure, and Sacramento Superior Court Local Rules prior to submitting
documents.
This form is to be returned if documents are resubmitted for processing.
Papers returned to: Richard Kirk Ruybalid DBA CA Construction
Clerk of the Court,
Date: 03/05/2014 By: ,
Deputy
Returned via:
Return By Public Bin
NOTICE TO FILING PARTY
Page: 1
RETURNED DOCUMENTS
Document Filed Date
March 05, 2014
Case Filing Date
September 24, 2007
Category
(Breach of Contract/Warranty)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814-1380 http://www.saccourt.ca.gov NOTICE TO FILING PARTY - RETURNED DOCUMENTS Case Title: Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Case Number: 07AS04450 We are unable to process the attached papers for the reasons indicated below: Document Rejected: Acknolwledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment and your check #37956 - Date in section 5a is incorrect as judgment was entered on 2/3/2011 (costs were posted to the judgment on 6/6/11). No notary acknowledgement is attached as required. There is no indication on drop sheet or check submitted for what the check is to be used for. It is the responsibility of the filing party to review any applicable statute, California Rules of Court, California Code of Civil Procedure, and Sacramento Superior Court Local Rules prior to submitting documents. This form is to be returned if documents are resubmitted for processing. Papers returned to: Richard Kirk Ruybalid DBA CA Construction Clerk of the Court, Date: 03/05/2014 By: , Deputy Returned via: Return By Public Bin NOTICE TO FILING PARTY Page: 1 RETURNED DOCUMENTS