arrow left
arrow right
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

ISED 1 Todd A. Jones (Bar No. 198024) tj ones@archemorris.com 2011 JUL-6 V.:i»^03 2 Gregory K. Federico (Bar No. 242184) gfederico(garchemorris.com 3 ARCHER NORRIS LEGM. PROCESS #2 A Professional Law Corporation 4 301 University Avenue, Suite 110 Sacramento, Califomia 95825-5537 5 Telephone; 916.646.2480 Facsimile: 916.646.5696 6 Attomeys for Defendants and Cross-Defendants 7 RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, individually, and dba CA CONSTRUCTION 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 11 12 RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE CaseNo. 07AS04450 ABBOTT, 13 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF AMENDED Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT ON VERDICT 14 Action Filed: September 24, 2007 15 RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 19 20 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Court entered the Amended Judgment on Verdict in 22 favor of Defendants RICHARD K. RUYBALID, individually and dba CA CONSTRUCTION 23 ("CA CONSTRUCTION") and MARK SMITH dba GROUNDBREAKERS ("SMITH") and 24 against Plaintiffs RODNEY AND FLORENTINE ABBOTT ("Plaintiffs") on June 6, 2011. 25 Pursuant to the Amended Judgment on Verdict, Defendant CA CONSTRUCTION is awarded 26 costs and attomeys' fees in the amount of $265,213.56. 27 28 NIC341/1185703-1 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT ON VERDICT 1 A copy ofthe Amended Judgment on Verdict is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 2 Dated: July 6, 2011 ARCHER NORRIS 3 4 Todd A.Jones ^ Attomeys for Defendants and Cross- Defendants RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, 6 individually, and dba CA CONSTRUCTION 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NIC341/1185703-1 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT ON VERDICT 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 Nameof Action: Rodney Abbott, et al. v. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Case No.: 07AS04450 3 I, Cindy A. Ingland, declare that I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this 4 action or proceeding. My business address is 301 University Avenue, Suite 110, Sacramento, Califomia 95825. On July 6,2011,1 caused the following document(s) to be served: 5 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT ON VERDICT 6 7 ^ By placing a tme copy of the documents listed above, enclosed in a sealed envelope, ^ addressed as set forth below, for collection and mailing on the date and at the business address showTi above following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar 9 with this business' practice for collection and processing of correspondence for IQ mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the same day that a sealed envelope is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business 11 with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. 12 I I By having a tme copy of the document(s) listed above transmitted by facsimile to the person(s) at the facsimile number(s) set forth below before 5:00 p.m. The transmission was reported as complete wdthout error by a report issued by the transmitting facsimile 14 machine. 15 j I By placing a tme copy ofthe document(s) listed above, in a box or other facility regularly maintained by UPS, an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or 16 driver authorized by the express service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope designated by the express service carrier, with delivery fees paid or provided for, ^' addressed as set forth below. ^^ r] bv having personal delivery bv FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES a tme copy of J9 the document(s) listed above, enclosed in a sealed envelope, to the person(s) and at the address(es) set forth below. 20 21 [SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST] 22 I declare under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. Executed on July 6, 2011, at Sacramento, Califomia. 23 " 24 25 26 27 28 NIC341/608293-1 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 Service List 2 Stephanie Finelli PLAINTIFFS 3 Law Offices of Stephanie J Finelli 1007 Seventh Street, Suite 500 Tel (916)443-2144 4 Sacramento, CA 95814 Fax:(916)443-1511 E-mail: sfinelli700@yahoo.com 5 Richard D. Sopp Counsel for CADRE DESIGN GROUP, INC. 6 Wheatley Sopp LLP 1004 River Rock Drive, Suite 245 Tel. (916) 988-3857 7 Folsom, CA 95630 Fax:(916)988-5296 Email' rds@mwsblaw.com 8 Mark Smith In Pro Per 9 3557 Val Verde Road Loomis, CA 95650 10 markdarlenesmith@gmail com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NrC341/608293-l 2 SERVICE LIST EXHIBIT "A" SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO No. 07AS04450 Dep-b. 43 RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE VS. RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, ind ABBOTT, and dba CA CONSTRUCTION; MARK SMITH, PLAINTIFFS, DEFENDANTS. ,,^c<,u^ JUDGMENT ON VERDICT THIS CAUSE came on regularly for trial with STEPHANIE FINEf-L appearing as counsel for the plaintxffs; TODD JONES and GREGORY FEDERICO for defendant RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, ind and dba CONSTRUCTION; and MARK SMITH, on his own behalf in pro per. THEREUPON, a jury of twelve persons was duly accepted, empaneled and sworn to try saxd cause. Witnesses on the part of the RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE ABBOTT; RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID, ind and dba CA CONSTRUCTION; and MARK SMITH, were duly sworn and examined. WHEREUPON, after hearing the evidence, the arguments of Counsel and instructions of the Court, the cause was submitted to the jury, who retired to deliberate upon their verdict, and subsequently returned into court, and, being called, all answered to their names, and then rendered the following verdict, which was accepted by the Court and entered on the minutes, as follows: ^CAmi^jy Page 1 of 7 -4450 020311 JDGONVERD • ^ 07AS04450 ABBOTT V BRITSCHGI JUDGMENT ON VERDICT, continued. WHEREFORE, by virtue of the law and by reason of the premises aforesaid, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE ABBOTT, plaintiffs to take nothing by this action as against RICHARD KIRK RUYBALD, ind and dba CA CONSTRUCTION, and MARK SMITH defendants, but that judgment be and the same is hereby entered herein in favor of 3«arii.^^|fg,P'^^^Itf^^' against the said plaintiffs for jfifii^ defendant Sy'VdcJ^tS^Sna^^^ sTnoOJtVv disbursements incurred in thi.^^^^bori,,.Miauntiyng to the sum o ' ~" •" '^JWN Dated:02/03/11 Honorable~BRIAN R. VAN CAMP, Judge of the Superior Court of Californ