arrow left
arrow right
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 10 11 RODNEY ABBOTT, et al.. CaseNo. 07AS04450 12 Plaintiffs, [ e R ^ e S ^ ] ORDER GRANTING vs. LEAVE TO FILE LATE 13 OPPOSITION AND 14 RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI, et al.. CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN 15 Defendants. ORDER COMPELLING BOND 16 17 18 19 The ex parte application of Plaintiffs Rodney and Florentine Abbott to continue the 20 hearing and for leave to file a late opposition on Defendant Richard Ruybalid dba CA 21 Construction's ("CA Construction") Motion for an Order Compelling Plaintiffs Florentine and 22 Rodney Abbott to Obtain a Bond on Appeal was heard on August 9, 2011. 23 Good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiffs' ex parte application is GRANTED; 25 2. The hearing on CA Construction's Motion for an Order Compelling Plaintiffs 26 Florentine and Rodney Abbott to Obtain a Bond on Appeal is continued to 27 , 2011 at ^ ' 3 0 / f . m . in Department 43 ofthe 28 this Court; and [PROPOSED] ORDER -1 1 3. Plaintiffs' opposition to-the )ositr>n to the Motion shall be filed no later than 2 3 llilli reply, if any, shall be filed no later than . Defendarat CA Construction's 'miu 4 5 Dated: August X , 2011 6 BRIAN VAN CAMP 7 Judge of the Superior Court 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2