arrow left
arrow right
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Rodney Abbott, et al vs. Ronald Paul Britschgi, et al Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 CRAIG N. LUNDGREN - State Bar No. 148842 RACHEL T. ANDERSON - State Bar No. 266505 2 LUNDGREN & REYNOLDS, LLP 424 2nd Street, Suite A 3 Davis, CA 95616 (530) 297-5030 (Voice) 4 (530) 297-5077 (Facsimile) 5 Attorneys for defendant, cross-complainant 6 and cross-defendant RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI, 7 individually and dba BRITSCHGI CONSTRUCTION 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 10 RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE ) CASENO.07AS04450 ABBOTT, 11 ) ORDER DETERMINING THAT Plaintiffs, ) SETTLEMENT WAS MADE IN 12 ) GOOD FAITH v. ) [Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6] 13 ) RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI et al. ) DATE: March 16,2010 14 ) TIME: 2:00 p.m. Defendants. ) DEPT:53 15 16 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 17 18 19 The motion of RONALD PAUL BRITSCHGI, individually and dba BRITSCHGI 20 CONSTRUCTION, defendant, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant in the above-entitled 21 matter (hereafter, "BRITSCHGI"), for an order determining that the settlement entered into 22 between BRITSCHGI and plaintiffs RODNEY ABBOTT and FLORENTINE ABBOTT, on 23 December 18, 2009, was entered into in good faith was set for hearing before this Court on 24 March 16, 2010. 25 The Court issued a tentative ruling on March 15, 2010, finding the motion to be 26 unopposed, and the settlement to be reasonable and in good faith considering the factors set 27 forth in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488; Code Civ. 28 Proc. §877.6. 1 ORDER DETERMINING THAT SETTLEMENT WAS MADE IN GOOD FAITH 1 The Court therefore finds and determines that the settlement entered into on December 2 18, 2009, between BRITSCHGI and plaintiffs, was made in good faith. This order is 3 contingent upon the concurrent dismissal of BRITSCHGI's cross-complaint against 4 defendant, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant RICHARD KIRK RUYBALID dba CA 5 CONSTRUCTION. 6 2 4 7 DATED: MA?. 2010 7udge of the Superior Court 8 LOREN E. McMASTER 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DETERMINING THAT SETTLEMENT WAS MADE IN GOOD FAITH Lundgren & Reynolds, LLP Craig N. Lundgren Stephen M. Reynolds clundgren@lr-law.net sreynolds@lr-law.net March 17, 2010 Clerk of the Court Dept 53 800 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Britschgi (Abbott v. Britschgi et al.) Dear Clerk: Enclosed is the Order Determining That Settlement Was Made In Good Faith which was granted by the court's tentative ruling on March 15, 2010. I will notify you if I do not hear from opposing counsel within five (5) days pursuant to California Rules of Court Rule 3.1312. Thereafter, please submit the order to Judge McMaster. Very Truly Yours, mdl Enclosure cc: Stephanie J. Finelli Gregory K. Feeler ico Richard D. Sopp Mark Smith Client 424 2nd Street, Suite A , Tel" (530) 297-5030 Davis, CA 95616 Fax: (530) 297-5077 www.lr-law.net