Preview
V V
CM-ZOO
OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Barn mber, and address): FOR COURTUSE ON”
—ATTORNEY
SARKIS s. KARAYAN, SBN316926, LAW OFFICE 0F HARRIS AND ZIDE
1445 HUNTINGTON DRIVE, SUITE 300
SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
TELEPHONE NO.: 626-799-8444 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): SUPER'ORFCgkaEF EMEORNIA
PLAINTIFF BANK OF AWRICA, N.A.
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARD'NO D'STR'CT
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
STREET ADDREss; 247 WEST THIRD STREET
MAILING ADDRESS?
APR 1 4 2022
CITY AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDINO, CA 924 5-02 0 1 1
BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER
BY
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. LfljfifiMAfigeMfl DEPUTY
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES, ET. AL.
CASE NUMBER:
. CIVSB21 19198
NOTICE 0F SETTLEMENT 0F ENTIRE CASE JUDGE: DAVID A. WILLIAMS
DEPT.; Sl7
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF 0R OTHER PARTY SEEKING RELIEF
settlement if the settlement is
You must file a request for dismissal of the entire case within 45 days after the date of the
case within 45 days after the date specified in item 1b below if the settlement
unconditional. You must file a dismissal of the entire
the required time or have shown good cause before the time for dismissal has
is conditional. Unless you file a dismissal within
expired why the case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the entire case.
To the court, all parties, and any arbitrator or other court-connected ADR neutral involved in this case:
This entire case has been settled. The settlement is:
D
1.
be filed 45 days after the date of the settlement.
a_ Unconditional. A request for dismissal will within
Date of settlement:
the satisfactory completion of
b_
Conditional. The settlement agreement conditions dismissal of this matter on
specified terms that are not to be performed within 45 days of the date of the settlement. A request for dismissal will
be filed no later than (date): 12/16/2023
2. Dateinitialpleading filed: 7/14/2021
3. Next scheduled hearing or conference:
a. Purpose: OSC
b- (1) Date: 7/14/2022
(2) Time: 9:00AM
(3) Department: 317
4. Trialdate:
a- Notrialdate set.
b- E (1) Date:
(2) Time:
(3) Department:
that the foregoing is tr
I declare under penalty of perjury under the |aws of the State of California
/
Date: 4/8/2022
SARKIS KARAYAN
(TYPE
S.
0R PRINT NAME 0F ATTORNEY E PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY)
X /,/ (SIGNATURE)
Page 1 of z
c1.R|
a rc n.|3.1385
F Adtdtht
°5'3diciglpceoun‘gl ofigaanfgfifiase
u NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE ”esvjwwf’c“ou,;;;cagov
CM-ZOO [Rev. January 1, 2007]
‘V \r
CM-200
CASE NUMBER
_ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
CIVSBZI 19198
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT; DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES, ET. AL.
PROOF 0F SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE
(NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case ifyou are a party in the action. The person who served
the notice must complete this proof of service.)
1. | am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. | am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took
place, and my residence or business address is (specify):
BUSINESS: 1445 HUNTINGTON DRIVE, SUITE 300, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
2‘ I served a copy of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid and (Check one):
fully
a E deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service.
placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices,
b.
with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is
deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.
3. The Notice of Settlement of Entire Case was mailed:
a. on (date): 4/8/2022
b- from (City aHd State): SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:
a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served:
DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES
Street address: 14588 OSAGE RD Street address:
City: APPLE VALLEY City;
State and zip code: CA 92307-4003 State and zip code:
b. Name of person served: d. Name of person sewed:
Street address: Street address:
City: City:
State and zip code: State and zip code:
E Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. n’ou may use form POS-030(P).)
5. Number of pages attached
Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: 4/8/2022
.//
KARAYAN ’ > /
SARKIS S.
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGMRE O&ECLARANT)
(V M /
//’ A
: .
CM-ZOOIRev- Januaw1v2°°71
NOTICE 0F SETTLEMENT 0F ENTIRE CASE “9“on
Related Content
in San Bernardino County
Case
Print
Jul 15, 2024 |
Wilfred J Schneider, Jr.
|
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422674
Case
Capital One N.a. -v- Verdin Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
. TBD |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422834
Case
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-03604
23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez
Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted
Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the
court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0051944
S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged
Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,
default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker,
Deram K
Ruling
PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC VS. CHRISTINA RANGEL ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC17559532
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 1. PLAINTIFF PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC's HEARING ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTION. Continued to August 6, 2024 on the court's motion. =(302/CK)
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES
Jul 27, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300997
DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300997
CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CV-23-006622
CV-23-006622 – DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL – Plaintiff Discover Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and unopposed.
The Court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the answer and complaint filed in this case. The answer admits all allegations in the complaint as true and does not assert any affirmative defenses.
Based on the pleadings, the Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against the defendant, and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(A).) Defendant, who did not oppose this motion, has not given the Court any reason to grant leave to amend. (Cf. Today's IV, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 1137, 1176, reh'g denied (Oct. 25, 2022), review denied (Jan. 18, 2023).)
Consequently, the unopposed motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court will sign the proposed order and the proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff. Court trial date to be vacated.
Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.
Ruling
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. Castro
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CVG-00362
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., VS. CASTRO
Case Number: 23CVG-00362
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Terminating Sanctions: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. moves
for terminating sanctions by striking Defendant Vincent Castro’s answer. Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the
amount of $1,572.75 for each motion.
Procedural Defect: As a procedural matter, this motion was served both via mail and email on May 9, 2024, and
set for a hearing date of June 7, 2024. CCP § 1005(b) requires all moving papers be served 16 court days before
the hearing. This notice period is extended by five calendar days if the motion is served by mail. Id. For service
by email, the notice period is extended by two court days. CCP § 1010.6(a)(3). This timeframe is calculated by
counting backwards from the hearing date but excluding the hearing date. CCP § 12c.
Starting with the June 7, 2024, hearing date and counting backwards 16 court days (excluding the Court holiday
of May 27, 2024) then five calendar days for out of state mailing this matter should have been served by mail no
later than, May 4, 2024. For email the last day to serve the motion was April 24, 2024. The motion was served
on May 7, 2024, and was untimely under either calculation. Based on insufficient statutory notice, the motion is
denied.
Merits of Motion: Even if the motion had been timely noticed, terminating sanctions are not warranted.
Terminating sanctions are a “drastic penalty and should be used sparingly.” Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract
Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 604. A terminating sanction should not generally be
imposed by the court until less severe sanctions have been attempted and were unsuccessful. Id. No justification
has been provided as to why terminating sanctions are appropriate in this context instead of lesser evidentiary or
issue sanctions. Without additional evidence, terminating sanctions would be premature.
The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the
denial.
Review Hearing: This matter is also on calendar for review regarding trial re-setting. The Court designates this
matter as a Plan II case and intends on setting it for trial no later than October 15, 2024. An appearance is
necessary on today’s calendar to discuss available trial dates.
Ruling
Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
23CV-0201860
ET AL.
Case Number: 23CV-0201860
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff and
Plaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20,
2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff and
Counsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctions
have not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would not
be effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate
Order of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
******************************************************************************
9:00 a.m. Review Hearings
******************************************************************************
Ruling
Sierra Central Credit Union vs. Goodwin
Jul 23, 2024 |
23CVG-00253
SIERRA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION VS. GOODWIN
Case Number: 23CVG-00253
This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement
informing the Court that the stay is still in effect. The matter is continued to Tuesday, January 23, 2025 at 9:00
a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Martinez Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
Tanada, Stephanie |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422781
Document
Bank Of America N.a. -v- Robledo Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Stephanie Thornton-Harris |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422569
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Preview
V V CM-ZOO OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Barn mber, and address): FOR COURTUSE ON” —ATTORNEY SARKIS s. KARAYAN, SBN316926, LAW OFFICE 0F HARRIS AND ZIDE 1445 HUNTINGTON DRIVE, SUITE 300 SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030 TELEPHONE NO.: 626-799-8444 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): SUPER'ORFCgkaEF EMEORNIA PLAINTIFF BANK OF AWRICA, N.A. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARD'NO D'STR'CT SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO STREET ADDREss; 247 WEST THIRD STREET MAILING ADDRESS? APR 1 4 2022 CITY AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDINO, CA 924 5-02 0 1 1 BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER BY PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. LfljfifiMAfigeMfl DEPUTY DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES, ET. AL. CASE NUMBER: . CIVSB21 19198 NOTICE 0F SETTLEMENT 0F ENTIRE CASE JUDGE: DAVID A. WILLIAMS DEPT.; Sl7 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF 0R OTHER PARTY SEEKING RELIEF settlement if the settlement is You must file a request for dismissal of the entire case within 45 days after the date of the case within 45 days after the date specified in item 1b below if the settlement unconditional. You must file a dismissal of the entire the required time or have shown good cause before the time for dismissal has is conditional. Unless you file a dismissal within expired why the case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the entire case. To the court, all parties, and any arbitrator or other court-connected ADR neutral involved in this case: This entire case has been settled. The settlement is: D 1. be filed 45 days after the date of the settlement. a_ Unconditional. A request for dismissal will within Date of settlement: the satisfactory completion of b_ Conditional. The settlement agreement conditions dismissal of this matter on specified terms that are not to be performed within 45 days of the date of the settlement. A request for dismissal will be filed no later than (date): 12/16/2023 2. Dateinitialpleading filed: 7/14/2021 3. Next scheduled hearing or conference: a. Purpose: OSC b- (1) Date: 7/14/2022 (2) Time: 9:00AM (3) Department: 317 4. Trialdate: a- Notrialdate set. b- E (1) Date: (2) Time: (3) Department: that the foregoing is tr I declare under penalty of perjury under the |aws of the State of California / Date: 4/8/2022 SARKIS KARAYAN (TYPE S. 0R PRINT NAME 0F ATTORNEY E PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) X /,/ (SIGNATURE) Page 1 of z c1.R| a rc n.|3.1385 F Adtdtht °5'3diciglpceoun‘gl ofigaanfgfifiase u NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE ”esvjwwf’c“ou,;;;cagov CM-ZOO [Rev. January 1, 2007] ‘V \r CM-200 CASE NUMBER _ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. CIVSBZI 19198 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT; DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES, ET. AL. PROOF 0F SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case ifyou are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service.) 1. | am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. | am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): BUSINESS: 1445 HUNTINGTON DRIVE, SUITE 300, SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030 2‘ I served a copy of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid and (Check one): fully a E deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, b. with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Settlement of Entire Case was mailed: a. on (date): 4/8/2022 b- from (City aHd State): SOUTH PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served: DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES Street address: 14588 OSAGE RD Street address: City: APPLE VALLEY City; State and zip code: CA 92307-4003 State and zip code: b. Name of person served: d. Name of person sewed: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: State and zip code: E Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. n’ou may use form POS-030(P).) 5. Number of pages attached Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 4/8/2022 .// KARAYAN ’ > / SARKIS S. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGMRE O&ECLARANT) (V M / //’ A : . CM-ZOOIRev- Januaw1v2°°71 NOTICE 0F SETTLEMENT 0F ENTIRE CASE “9“on