arrow left
arrow right
  • HENRY-V-SUNRISE FORD, INC. ET AL Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • HENRY-V-SUNRISE FORD, INC. ET AL Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • HENRY-V-SUNRISE FORD, INC. ET AL Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
  • HENRY-V-SUNRISE FORD, INC. ET AL Print Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ROBERTW. THOMPSON, Esq (SBN 106411) ochJgTEFBUFW summon 1w MICHA L SHIN, Es SBN 320504) v Fm aERNARD cgguNTBEFgNAWNO 0‘57”“ £A€I§AHAM TEHOMPSONqSEIERMAN ac CAUDILL, LLP c 021 2501 Main Street, Suite aoo ' Irvine, California 92614 Tab (949) 251-2872 Christianhamamz Fax: (949) 2616060 ‘OOOQGlh-hwwn— Email: rthorppson@ctsclaw com mshin@ctsclaw. com Attorneys for Defendant, SUNRISE FORD, INC. Larry Hoddick, Cal. Bar No. 237527 Email: LHoddick@dc.rr.com LAW OFFICES OF LARRY R. HODDICK, P.C. 74-000 Country Club Drive, Suite C5 Palm Desert, California 92260 Tclcphone (760) 636-5256; Fax (760) 299-4220 .m. ' Robert Stem ler, Bar No. 160299 aw Email. SoCa aConsumerLawyer@GmaiI com CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF _ a i g mgmmg‘m ROBERT STEMPLER, APC 8200 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 200 _ Beverly Hills, CA 9021 1-2331 _ NNNHHo—Lu—nn—no—tn—ir—In—An—I Telephone (323) 486-0102; Fax: (323) 488-6895 _ .- *2 _ Attorneys for Plaintiff .- WW SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO gggfififimHoomqo‘mgmuHo I BILLY C. HENRY, Case N0.: CIVDSISZZZZZ JUDGE: Hon. Khymberli S. Apaloo Plaintiff, DEPARTMENT: $25 vs. COMPLAINT DATE: August 23, 201 8 I SUNRISE FORD, INC; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; FORD MOTOR CREDIT JOINT STIPULATION TO. COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, CONTH‘IUE DEFENDANT SUNRISE FORD INC. ’S ' inclusive, MOTION FOR S’U'MMARY JUDGMENT 0R FOR Defendants. SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AND [WED] ORDER _ 1 _ JOINT smULATION T0 CONTINUE HEARING 0N MSJ, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER H COMES NOW, Plaintiff BILLY C. HENRY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant SUNRISE FORD, (collectively “the parties”), by and tfirough their attorneys of record, and INC. (“Dcfendant’) stipulate and agree as foilows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on August 23, 2018. WHEREAS, the Defendant’s hearing on their Motion for Summary Judgment or, (herein “Defendant's Motion"), is currently set to be heard on \Dmflmmhww alternatively, Summary Adjudication December 20, 2021, which the Défendant filed on July l6, 2021, that the Court continued by'its Order on Stipulation, dated August 10 2021; 2022; WHEREAS, an Order to Show Cause Hearing re Mediation Status,‘15 set for March 29, WHEREAS, the trial ofthis matter is set to commence on May 9, 2022; I schedule WHEREAS, Plaintiff‘s counsel have been working with Defendant’s counsel to individual, non-party depositions prior to the hearing on Defendant'sSummary Judgment Motion, fiilaw to proceed in an orderiy and timely but need to continue the hearing to permit those depositions a Wmmmxgmw manner; THEREFORE, Plaintiff BILLY C. HENRY and Defendant SUNRISE FORD, INC. jointly stipulate and agree to continue the Defendant‘s hearing on their Motion for Summary Judgment or, alternatively, Summary Adjudication, currently set for December 20, 2021, to February 2, 2022, or MQGMAWNHOOMQO‘MAb-‘NHO NMMNNNNNNI—awr—‘a—IHHHHHH based on the Court’s availability. Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose or any other date thereafter, pleadings, should be otherwise reSpond to Defendant’s Motion, and Defendant’s responsive continued in accordance with and computed fi‘om the new hearing date set by the Court. Signature page to follow. . . /// /// /// /// /// - 2 - 101m STIPULATION To CONTINUE HEARING 0N M51; AND [PROPOSED] QRDER