On August 23, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Henry, Billy C,
Sunrise Ford Inc A California Corporation,
and
Bruncati, Daniel,
Bruncati, James,
Bruncati, Robert,
Does 2 Through 50,
Ford Motor Company,
Ford Motor Credit Company,
Sunrise Ford, Inc.,
for Business Tort
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATrORNEY: ClV-1 41
STATE BAR No: 320504 FOR COURT USE ONLY
NAMEzJiwon Michael Shin, Esq.
Callahan Thompson Sherman
FIRM NAME: & Caudil], LLP
STREEr ADDREss:2601 Main Street, Ste. 800 3..
CITY: Irvine
TELEpHoNE No; 949-261-2872
STATECA zn= CODE:92614 SUPER’ORpEO'UR E
:Ax No; 949-261-6060 CQUNTY or. s AT, gEFFgAUFORMA
E-MAIL M AN
ADDRESS:mshin@ctsclaw.com BERNAFDINO DIS/firfilbégo
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Sunrise Ford, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO APR
‘
'
1 l 2022
STREEr ADDRESS 247 West Third
Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street 1”!"
CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Bemardino, 92415-02 1 0
:
3y
f
BRANCH NAME San Bemardino District - Civil Division 33 ‘ L K D'AM’CO'
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Billy C. Henry
DEPUTY
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Sunrise Ford, Inc., et al.
DECLARATION 0F DEMURRING 0R MOVING PARTY ”SENUMBER
IN SUPPORT 0F AUTOMATIC EXTENSION CIVDs1822222
1. (Name ofparty): Sunrise Ford, Inc. was sewed with
E a complaint D an amended complaint
D a cross-complaint
Ein
an answer
the above-titled action.
Other (SPeC/fl’)-'Amendment to Complaint re DOE 1
2. For a demurrer or motion to strike, a responsive pleading due on
is (date).'April 12, 2022
DECLARATION
intend to file a demurrer, motion to strike, or motion forjudgment on the pleadings
l
in this action. Before can do so, am required to I |
meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading that am responding to at least five |
days before the date when the responsive
pleading is due (ifl am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five
days before the last day a motion for judgment on the
pleadings may be filed (ifl am filing a motion forjudgment on the pleadings). We
have not been able to meet and confer. have not l
previously requested an automatic extension of fime. Therefore, on timely filing and serving
a declaration that meets the requirements
of Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.41, 435.5, or 439, am entitled to an automatic 30-day extension of time within which to file a
|
responsive pleading or motion forjudgment on the pleadings.
| made a good
faith attempt to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading
at least five days before the date the responsive
pleading was due (ifl am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five days before the last day a motion for
judgment on the
pleadings may be filed (ifl am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings). Iwas unable to
meet with that party because
(the reasons why the pan‘ies could not meet and confer are stated):
m below E on form MC-031, Attached Declaration
We have not been able to meet and confer with Plaintiff because we have hot yet completed our analysis of
the Amendment to Complaint.
Datei 4/1 1/2022
Jiwon Michael Shin, Esq. >
(NAME or: PARTV 0R ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) (sweNATUREK:
w
PA¥Y 0R ATTORNEY POW
Page1 of1
jgggiglpgfuvneglgrgafigggfiyse DECLARATION 0F DEMURRING 0R MOVING PARTY Cogggmjgoscgéggeé
C'V-W IR" Jaw 1r 2°19]
IN SUPPORT 0F AUTOMAnc EXTENSION
Wanawvggcwfgggggmr
6
gs; aw
G
1.4
6am ©
gfi» V W
T7
fl
Tn
o
V y
?;‘g
*’
m q-
‘
9.2%?”
3%
2%
9%
A
‘9‘”
@
fl“
x, p
Document Filed Date
April 11, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 23, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.