arrow left
arrow right
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
  • PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP CORP Vs JAMES R BETSCHEL VS.JAMES R BETSCHEL ET ALOTHER CIVIL document preview
						
                                

Preview

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P87 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION Preferred Membership Corp., Plaintiff, Case No. 23 CV 003119 v Category H James R. Betschel, et.al., Judge Cocroft Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CHERYL MANNS The Plaintiff, Preferred Membership Corp. (“Plaintiff” or “Preferred”) applies for default judgment against Defendant Cheryl Manns (“Manns”) in accordance with Ohio Civil Rule 55(A) and Local Rule 55.02. Manns has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided in the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure (“Civil Rules”) and the Plaintiff is entitled to default judgments against Manns as to liability on the Plaintiff's 1%, 3", 7, 11", 13", 14", 19 215 and 22™ Causes of Action. The Plaintiff requests that a hearing on the amounts of damages to be awarded against Manns be deferred for a later determination by the Court. The Plaintiff served written notice of this Application on Manns by overnight delivery and ordinary U.S. mail more than ten (10) business days before the filing of this Application because she may have appeared in this action 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P88 The Plaintiff attaches a Memorandum and Exhibits in support of this Motion. A proposed judgment entry will be submitted contemporaneously with this Application. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert B. Berner Robert B. Berner (0020055) Bailey Cavalieri LLC 409 E. Monument Avenue, Suite 103 Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-223-0254 / Fax: 937-223-0170 E-Mail: rberner: £9) and Matthew T. Schaeffer (0066750) Bailey Cavalieri LLC 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone: 614-229-3289 / Fax: 614-221-0479 E-Mail: mischaeffer@baileycay.com Counsel for Preferred Membership Corp. MEMORANDUM 1 Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Manns and other Defendants on May 2, 2023 2 The Plaintiff seeks affirmative monetary relief against Manns in its 1%, 3°, 7, 11%, 13, 14 19% 21% and 224 Causes of Action. 3 Manns was served with a Summons and the Complaint on May 9, 2023 by Certified Mail Proof of service upon Manns is attached as Exhibit 1. In accordance with Ohio Civ. R. 12(A)(1), Manns’ responsive pleading was due on or before June 6, 2023. 4 Manns is neither a minor nor an incompetent person. 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P89 5 Manns has not contacted Preferred to request an extension to move, answer, plead or otherwise defend. 6 Manns has not plead or otherwise defended as required by the Ohio Civil Rules. In fact, she has not made any filing with the Court. See Docket. 7 However, on May 30, 2023, Preferred’s counsel received an affidavit from Manns (the “Manns Affidavit”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2, The Manns Affidavit was not filed with the Court Manns Has Not Plead or Otherwise Defended. 8 Civil Rule 55(A) provides: Entry of judgment. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules, the party entitled to a judgment by default shall apply in writing ... to the court therefor; but no judgment by default shall be entered against a minor or an incompetent person unless represented in the action by a guardian or such other representative who has appeared therein 9 Ohio Courts have interpreted the “otherwise defend” provision in Civil Rule 55(A) to require contact with the Court. In Walton Constr. Co. v. Perry, 1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 4647, the Second District Court of Appeals noted that “[t]he phrase ‘otherwise defend’ appears in the disjunctive with the phrase ‘failed to plead’” and thus a defendant “would be required to make a filing in the court where the action is venued, or at least contact the court, to ‘otherwise defend’ as a substitute for filing a responsive pleading.” 10. In keeping with the requirement that to “otherwise defend” requires a filing with the court, decisions have construed the phrase to refer to “attacks on the service, or motions to dismiss, or for better particulars, and the like, which may prevent default without presently pleading to the merits.” Ruckman v. Riebel, 215 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 3382 (citing Discover Bank v. Schiefer, 2010-Ohio-2980). In Ruckman, a letter filed by defendant with the court did “not meet 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P90 the requirements of an answer” because it did not contain a case caption, did not contain a certificate of service, did not “set forth averments in separate number paragraphs,” and failed to comply with general rules of pleading and methods of pleading defenses. Thus, it was not an answer and default judgment was proper. 11. Manns has not plead or otherwise defended. In fact, she has made any filing with the Court. Therefore, Manns is subject to default under Civil Rule 55(A). Manns May Have Appeared in this Action by Virtue of Her Affidavit. 12. Civil Rule 55(A) further provides ... If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, [the party] ... shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least seven days prior to the hearing on such application. 13. Local Rule 55.02 provides for greater notice than Civil Rule 55(A). “Motions for default judgment must be served by e-filing or ordinary mail upon all parties that have appeared or otherwise defended no less than ten (10) business days before counsel tenders a default judgment entry by e-filing to the court.” 14. Although Manns has not plead or otherwise defended, her affidavit may constitute “appearance,” entitling her to notice before the entry of a default. 15 In Johnson vy. Romeo, 2006-Ohio-7073, plaintiff moved for default judgment against defendant. Defendant did not file an answer or any other document with the Court. However, six days after receiving the complaint, defendant sent a letter by certified mail to plaintiffs counsel that disputed the allegations in the complaint. The court found that a defendant “makes an appearance under Civ. R. 55(A) when the party clearly expresses to the opposing party an intention and purpose to defend the suit, regardless of whether a formal filing is made” (citing Miamisburg Motel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 88 Ohio App. 3d 117). Thus, defendant “appeared” 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P91 in the action by sending the letter to Johnson’s counsel and was entitled to notice before the entry of a default in accordance with Civil RuleS5(A). 16. However, other Ohio courts have required that a defendant “at least contact the court” in order to make an appearance for purposes of Civil Rule 55. For example, the court in Accettola v. Big Sky Energy, 2014 Ohio App. Lexis 1301, noted that "the language of Civ.R. 55 suggests court involvement” because a defendant appears “before the court, not before the opposing party.” 17. Notwithstanding the fact that Manns has had no contact with the Court, in an abundance of caution, Preferred gave Manns at least ten (10) business days written notice by overnight delivery and ordinary mail before the instant application was filed in accordance with Local Rule 55.02 (and Civil Rule 55(A) which only requires seven days’ notice). A copy of Preferred’s notice is attached as Exhibit 3. Preferred Requests Judgment as to Liability Only with Damages Determined Later. 18. Finally, Civil Rule 55(A) provides that: Tf, in order to enable the court to enter judgment ..., it is necessary to ... determine the amount of damages . the court may conduct such hearings as it deems necessary and proper ... 19. When granting a motion for default judgment, a court is permitted to determine only the issue of liability and continue the hearing on damages for a later date. See, e.g., Lindsey vy. Rumpke, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 5302. 20. Preferred’s damage claims are unliquidated and the Court is required to hold a hearing to determine damages. However, other defendants (including James Betschel) are expected to contest Preferred claims. Therefore, in the interests of judicial economy, Preferred 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P92 requests that the court grant default judgment against Manns as to liability only and defer the determination of the amounts of the damages to a later date. 21. Preferred will submit a proposed default judgment entry contemporaneously with the filing of this Application. 22. In conclusion, Preferred requests (a) default judgments against Manns as to liability on its 1%, 3, 7 11% 13 14! y9th 21st and 22™ Causes of Action, with the amounts of those judgments to be determined at a later date and (b) such other and further relief to which Preferred may be entitled at law or in equity Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert B. Berner Robert B. Berner (0020055) Bailey Cavalieri LLC 409 E. Monument Avenue, Suite 103 Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-223-0254 / Fax: 937-223-0170 E-Mail: rberner@ibaileycav com and Matthew T. Schaeffer (0066750) Bailey Cavalieri LLC 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone: 614-229-328 / Fax: 614-221-0479 E-Mail: Counsel for Preferred Membership Corp. 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P93 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Thereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Cheryl Manns was served electronically on the date of filing through the court's ECF system on all ECF participants registered in the case at the email addresses registered with the court and via U.S. Mail upon the following on July 19, 2023 Cheryl Manns 6719 County Road 95 Ada, OH 45810 EDATA by Design, Inc. 1008 Cedar Pointe Parkway, Apt. 1008 Antioch, TN 37013 Bryan C. Martinez 3509 Coleman Hill Road Rockvale, TN 37153 Tiffany Gibson 427 West Kohler Street Kenton, OH 43326 /s/ Robert B. Berner RobertB. Berner (0020055) 4875-5182-9611v1 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P94 -_— EXHIBIT 1 YNITED STATES E370 ‘POSTAL SERVICE. Date Produced: 05/15/2023 coc: The following is the delivery information for Certified Mail™/RRE item number 9214 8901 1952 2808 0654 42. Our records indicate that this item was delivered on 05/09/2023 at 02:49 p.m. in ADA, OH 45810. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below. Signature ot Recipient : Address of Recipient : Thank you for selecting the Postal Service for your mailing needs. If you require additional assistance, please contact your local post office or Postal Service representative. Sincerely, United States Postal Service The customer reference number shown below is not validated or endorsed by the United States Postal Service. It is solely for customer use. te ve = as Sa a Customer Reference Number: 4581023CV03119PREFE Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 06469 - P 9 EXHIBIT 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT COLUMBUS, OHIO Preferred Membership Corp 23CV-05-3119 Plaintiff -vs- Cheryl Manns and Tiffany Gibson Defendants AFFIDAVIT I, Cheryl Ann Manns, of Ada, Ohio, in Hardin County, Ohio, MAKE OATH AND SAY THAT: The true facts are that I was hired in 2001 by Dilip Bhvani to close out a business he acquired in Alger Ohio called Capital City Marketing, later called Values4Less. Later that year, Bhavani introduced me to James Betschel who would be starting a new business with Bhavani and asked me to work for Betschel. During that meeting Bhavani told me that I would be dealing exclusively with Betschel. For 20 plus years, Betschel is the only one that I had contact with regarding the business of Preferred Membership. Bhvani was not involved with our office in any way. I only saw Bhvani the day I was hired and the day he came to the office to ask about how the business was ran and billing was processed. All decisions, financials, marketing, domains, billing, invoicing, maintenance was directed by Page | of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P96 James Betschel. In 20+ years, Bhvani never contacted me, by phone, email or in person regarding Preferred Memberships. with an I was informed by Betschel that he and Bhvani were 50/50 partners in the business d agreement that Betschel was buying out Bhvani for total control of the business. Preferre of what Betschel Membership employees including myself were workin under the assumption was relaying to us regarding his control and ownership of Preferred Membership. ship and Betschel was the Bhvani never requested any information from me or Preferred Member financials, invoices, bills only one in contac! t with him and Suncoast. All information, including Betschel passed on to etc were sent directly by email to Betschel. I have no knowledge of what Bhvani or if Bhvani received anything from Betshel. y to James Betschel. I had no All information, invoices, bills, financial etc was sent directl Bhvani and Betschel. knowledge of the agreements, contracts or workings between ts were made to through USAePay Preferred Membership had 21 merchant accounts that deposi all funds from thes and MAS. My understanding of that process is that Bhvani swept e accounts everyday into Suncoast, his business. were setup by Betschel. Bhvani had Lhad no access to these merchant accounts or how they Thave no knowledge or these accounts moved to Wells Fargo and then to another place. what agreements Bhvani and understanding of the back end of the merchant accounts or Betschel had regarding these. billing Platform to Sublytic’s. This would Starting at the end of 2022, B etschel was changing our that her position in billing and be an automated billing platform. One employee was angry with assu rance that we would be able invoicing would be eliminated due to the automation. Even ut notice. to keep her in another position, she walked out witho ed her to return. She This employee, Jessica Wicker, had walked out before and I allow that she was diagnosed with that caused her apologized and said that she had a mental condition g platform would replace her position in billing. to walk out and she was upset that the new billin coworker of her’s was leaving to pursue She was also upset that Kylie Wilhelm, a friend and another career as they were close. Page 2 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 oG4 69 - Pg 7 In December, 2022, Bhvani came to Preferred Membership in Alger, Ohio. During that visit, Bhvani asked me to explain how our billing worked and I walked him through the whole process, I gave him a tour of our facilities as he had never been to Alger in 20+ years. During that visit, Bhvani told me that he was 100% owner of Preferred Membership and showed me a paper. I am still not sure of that fact as I was led to believe otherwise for over 20 years. I explained to Bhvani about Betschel informing me that he was buying out Bhvani and opening up his own merchant accounts in preparation for when that happened. Betschel had told me that he was waiting on Bhvani to get back to him with a final price. Page 13, 50 at no time did I believe that I was participating in allowing Betschel to steal money from Preferred Membership. BNS was on the financials for a year or more that was sent to James daily. If Bhvani did not get those accurate financials that I sent to Betschel, my emails will prove that I did in fact send them to Betschel. I have no knowledge of the information that was sent to Bhvani as I had zero contact with him for over 20 years. Moving customers to other programs was part of our responsibilities. If a membership was changed or cancelled, customers would be moved. This had to be done by hand and everyone in our office had to be involved in this long and tedious process at the direction of Betschel. Betschel stated that BSA customers that were being moved was due to him keeping a Global Marketing merchant account open so that when he was full owner, it would already be established. No one, including myself, knew the back end of the merchant account and whether it was being swept by Suncoast, Bhvani, along with all of our other merchant accounts. I never admitted wrong doing as I was following orders from the owner of the company. I was NEVER involved with the monetary agreements or setups agreed to by Betschel and Bhvani. Page 3 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P98 1 did answer all questions truthfully and stated to Bhvani that I believed what I was told by Betschel for over 20 plus years. Bhvani never once called to speak to me regarding how or whether he was involved in Preferred Membership. Page 14:53 My understanding BNS merchant as well as all of Preferred Membership merchant accounts were setup by James Betschel and Suncoast. I would have no information on whether any or all of the merchant accounts were being swept into the Suncoast account as I would not have access to that information, Page 15: 59 As stated before, customers were moved to other memberships during the course of routine business as per James Betschel. I never knowingly or willingly moved customers from one company to another to help or aid Betschel in any deceit. From my understanding, all merchant accounts were setup to be swept into an account of Bhvani’s daily. In fact, there were times that the merchant accounts were swept clean and Preferred Membership had to contact Bhvani, because of payroll or another bill not being able to be processed, Page 15: 59b Betschel’s email to me regarding him setting up additional merchant accounts. Betschel informed me that he was setting up merchant accounts to be able to move customers over once he finalized the purchase of Preferred Membership. Page 15:c, d Emails regarding moving customers from BSA to BNS to keep BNS merchant active until final purchase of Preferred Membership. Following owners direction without any knowledge of wrong doing. In fact, Lisa Wilhelm, the employee who brought in sales, contacted our MAS specialist to see if he could create a program to make it easier for her to move them. Page 16; 62 Neither I nor Gibson, diverted any membership fee’s away from Preferred Memberships. All merchant accounts were setup by Betschel and Bhvani. No one on my staff or myself, including my billing team, knew that the backend of the merchant wasn’t setup the same as the others. Nor did we know if the funds were being swept by Bhvani. We did not have access to the information for any of our merchant accounts and are only aware of the sweep because of what we were told from Betschel. Page 4 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 0G469 - P99 No fees were knowingly diverted from Preferred Memberships. If that was the case, no one, including myself, had access to that information as that information would be outside of our positions and responsibilities. Page 19:77 I did not conceal or commit any wrong doings regarding financials, invoices, false sales, and did not maintain any other data to the contrary. I have no idea what fraudulent records were kept or maintained. Page 19; 77 At no time did I deceive or tell our employees that Betschel had purchased Preferred Membership. Betschel did tell us that he was in the process of signing an agreement to purchase Preferred Memberships. He maintained that he was 50% owner. ago, Betschel stated that the business was owned When Preferred Membership started, 20+ years had each. Years later, Betschel stated that Bob by Betschel, B! hvani and a guy named Bob. 33% Bhvani. retired and now he was 50/50 owner with happened to All invoices were sent dire tly to Bets chel. I had no knowledge or control of what g was that Betschel forwarded everything to them after he received them. My understandin Suncoast for payment. Ihave no knowledge of encryption of any information on the billing platform except for the customers credit card information, which is a PCI requirement. All billing was processed exactly the same and could not be diverted after the merchant accounts were setup. We were instructed to bill a certain amount daily by Betschel. Kylie Wilhem and Jessica Wicker processed all billing daily. They also were in charge of financial information of everything that they were processing for the day. Wilhelm was in direct contact with Betschel regarding billing and financials. At the end of each day Wilhelm or Wicker would put the financial report into a folder with other reports that I would email to Betschel at the end of the day. Wilhelm emailed this information every Friday as I was not in the office on Friday’s. Page 20; f Betschel gave his credit card information to be billed on occasion. His explanation was that Betschel had borrowed money from Bhvani and needed to pay it back. Page 20;78 Gibson and I, as well as most of our employees created a CYA file to keep any documents that we questioned from Betschel. These files were not created because we had done anything deceitful or concealing. These files were created because we were not sure if Betschel Page 5 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 06469 - Ql or Bhvani might be doing something illegal. Everyone was getting nervous regarding Bhvani and Betschel and the money Betschel needed to pay back that was affecting our billing. We created a ‘cover your ass” file in case they were doing something illegal. Preferred Membership employees had several meetings during this time to discuss the direction that Betschel was taking the company. For 20+ years, Betschel ran the company as the owner and the only person that anyone had contact with. We had no reason to believe that he was lying about the ownership. Bhvani never was involved in any part of the business as far as our office knew. All employees at Preferred Membership had no one to go to besides Betschel if we had questions or concerns. We were not permitted to contact Bhvani or Suncoast and everything had to go through Betschel. When Betschel setup the BNS merchant, all of the financials were included on the financials that Kylie Wilhelm and Jessica Wicker filled out and sent to Betschel. This led us to believe that Bhvani knew about the merchant account and had the monies deposited swept into the Suncoast accounts the same as every other merchant account. Bhvani had that information unless Betschel changed or did not send to it Bhvani. No employee of Preferred Membership was concealing or encrypting documents to cover for any wrongdoings of Betschel. In fact, the CYA files were created because of our distrust of Betschel and Bhvani. I, as well as all of our employees, were basically working blindly, trusting what was being told to us. I did not know the agreements or contracts that were between Betschel and Bhvani and am disgusted that either party would involve anyone besides themselves in this situation. I did not deceive, conceal, divert, any material or facts to anyone. Bhvani and Betschel are the only ones who would know what their arrangements or agreements were regarding Preferred Membership. I was never part of the discussion of that part of the business. Betschel gave instructions and directions to myself as well as everyone else in the office. If he deceived his employees, then everyone in our office were working under the pretense of what Page 6 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 06469 - Q2 was told to us by Betschel. All Preferred Membership employees, including myself and Gibson were the ones being used and deceived. With the BNS information actually included on our financials, why would my employees or myself question this billing? I had no knowledge of any diverted funds. Merchant accounts were setup by Betschel and Bhvani and I would have no say on where the deposits would be made. No concealment was made by myself or any other employee of Preferred Membership. Who were we concealing the information from when Betschel was a 50/50 owner, in the process of was having his attorneys purchasing Preferred Membership from Bhvani. Betschel said Bhvani any di lay now, he would be 100% owner. to go over the purchase agreement and d Membership ni never had contact with Preferre No conce: alment was made to Bhvani as Bhva anything from him over 20 year s. To say that mys elf or any of our em ployees concealed for chel woul d have ever had contact witl h Bhvani. Only Bets would be impossible because we never about Preferred Membership. been giving Bhvan: i information were working L was working under the direction of James Betschel, in fact, all of the employees under his direction. If anyone was deceived, it was myself and every single one of our employees. Each one of our employees were performing their duties under the impression that James was the owner, James was purchasing Preferred Membership, Betschel and Bhvani had a deal going that did not include our input regarding the purchase of Preferred Membership. Bhvani never one time reached out to me or anyone else employed by Preferred Membership to get information, ask questions or just to check in to see how our employees were doing. This just reinforced what Betschel was telling all of us regarding the sale of Preferred Membership and the 100% ownership that Betschel would be receiving. I respectfully ask that any charges be dismissed against me. would totally am an honest, hardworking employee who was left out of all information that truthful to alert me that anything was wrong with what Betschel was doing. I was completely Bhvani and had no reason to be deceitful to him. Page 7 of 8 Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 Jul 19 5:24 PM-23CV003119 06469 - Q3 Lam disapp: ed that Bhivani totally ignored Prefern Mernbership and our employes OF VET 20 years and i any of wrong doing, er pl YG 3 TRE MY beyand at Praferred pers 8. working bo TUE did Sercosst or & AMD HG we would know that he awwned red M Oy ook }x on tb ory vhership or fo ch: oO ar omiploy 8 2 Oo aviedge of any part of anyone & SEC ected £0 SUIMMIONS EXoe) mt for iba as sbo w HE ing under the same as ap BY thai Retachel was owner ane parc Prof RF ‘ed Mest n 160% avener fi Cheryl Manus STISCR OS Ada, Oh 45810 567-874-2867 STATE OF OHIO ae TY OF HARD Siesec AND SSVORN TO BE E M ont fy 25 day af KA ory] Manas fare ESE ehh 8 OTARY My © ay expires: oO WAL ss Samantha K Eva: y;Pag: so8 feataryFy HOTELS SVs Lal By Conamagskar Shsptas 2 oS es of TRrenidin County Oto Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleans- 2023 tush 22 5-25 POLZSCWOESIS 06469 - QA EXHIBIT 3 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION Preferred Membership Corp., Plaintiff, Case No 23 CV 003119 Vv Category H James R. Betschel, et.al., Judge Cocroft Defendants. NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY PLAINTIFF AGAINST DEFENDANT CHERYL MANNS Please take notice that Plaintiff Preferred Membership Corp. will file with this Court its Application For Default Judgment Against Defendant Cheryl Manns (a copy of which is attached hereto) on or after the tenth day following the service of this Notice. This Notice is served pursuant to Rule SS(A) of the Obio Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 55.02 Respectfully submitted, is! Robert B. Berner Robert B. Berner (0020055) Bailey Cavalieri LLC 409 E. Monument Avenue, Suite 103 Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-22 2Ba 0254 / Fax: 937-223-0170 E-Mail and Matthew T. Schaeffer (0066750) c Bailey Cavalieri I 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone: 614-229-3289 / Fax: 614-221-0479 E-Mail: » iad! Counsel for referred Membership Corp. 4853-455 1460201 Frenidin County Oto Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2023 tush 1S 5-25 POLISCWOESIS 06469 - Q5 € TIFICATE OF SERVICE Thereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Netice of Application for Default Judgment by Plaintiff Against Defendant Cheryl Manns was served electronically on the date of filing through the court's ECF system on all ECF participants registered in the case at the email addresses registered with the court and upon the parties listed below via the delivery method indicated on June 28, 2023: Via overnight delivery and ordinary U.S. Mail upon: Chery! Manns 6719 County Road 95 Ada, OH 45810 Via ordinary U.S. Mail upon: EDATA by Design, Inc. 1008 Cedar Pointe Parkway, Apt. 1008 Antioch, TN 37013 Bryan C. Martinez 3509 Coleman Hill Road Rockvale, TN 37153 Tiffany Gibson 427 West Kohler Street Kenton, OH 43326 isi Robert B. Berner Robert B. Berner (0020055) 4853-455 1460201 TFrenidin County Oto Clerk of Courts of the Common Plens- 2023 tush 2 5-25 POLISCWOESIS 06469 - Q6 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION Preferred Membership Corp., Plaintiff, Case No. 23 CY 003119 Vv. Category H James R. Betschel, et.al., Judge Cocroft Defendants. PLAINTIFE’S APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CHERYL MANNS The Plaintiff, Preferred Membership Corp. (“Plaintiff or “Preferred”) applies for default , judgment against Defendant Chery! Manns (“Man } in accordance with Ohio Civil Rule S5(A) and Local Rule 55.02 Manns has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided in the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure (“Civil Rules”) and the Plaintiff is entitled to default judgments against Manns as to Hability on the Plaintiff's 1% 3" 7% pi" 3" pa po 21% and 22" Causes of Action. The Plaintiff requests that a hearing on the amounts of damages to be awarded against Manns be deferred for a later determination by the Court. The Plaintiff served written notice of this Application on Manns by overnight delivery and ordinary U.S. maif more than ten (10) business days before the filing of this Application because she may have appeared in this action 4875-5 Have iFrenidin Couamtty Oto Clerk of Courts of the Common Plens- 2023 tush 2 5-25 POLISCWOESIS 06469 - Q7 The Plaintiff attaches a Memorandum and Exhibits in support of this Motion. A proposed judgment entry will be submitted contemporaneously with this Application. Respectfully submitted, si Robert 8. Berner Robert B. Berner (0020055) Bailey Cavalieri € 409 E. Monument Avenue, Suite 103 Dayton, Ohio 45402 Phone: 937-223-0254 / Fax: 937-223-0170 E-Mail be 2¥ and Matthew T. Schaeffer (0066750) Ba