On December 03, 2013 a Verdict was filed involving a dispute between Karidis-Koepke, Nancy, Koepke, Harold, and A.B.C. Mobile Systems, A.B.C. Mobile Systems, Individually And As, American Honda Motor Co. Inc., Bell Industries, Inc., Bell Industries Inc., Individually And As, Belnortel Corporation, D.B.A. A.B.C. Mobile Brake, Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc., Individually And As, Burlingame Auto Supply, Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., Cooper Industries Llc, Cooper Industries, Llc, Individually And As, Don L. Morris, Inc., First Doe Through Four Hundredth Doe, Inclusive, Fmc Corporation-John Bean Automotive Equipment, Fmc Technologies, Inc., Individually And As, Folsom Auto Supply, Ford Motor Company, Foreland Parts, Inc.,, Genuine Parts Company, H.M. Royal, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Fka Allied Signal,, Kelsey-Hayes Company, Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp.,, Les Vogel Chevrolet Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Morton International, Inc., A Rohm And Haas, Morton International, Llc, Formerly Known As, National Automotive Parts Association, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Individually And As, Pneumo Abex Llc, Individually And As Successor In, Rox Automotive, Shell Oil Company, Specialty Foreign Auto Parts, Inc., Erroneously, The Budd Company, Thyssenkrupp Budd Company Sued As "The Budd, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., University Distributors, Inc., Erroneously Sued, Volkswagen Group Of America, Inc., W. Berry Hurley Corporation, D.B.A. Federal Auto, Karidis-Koepke, Nancy, Koepke, Harold, The Hertz Corporation, for civil in the District Court of San Francisco County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
—— I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jul-31-2014 2:56 pm Case Number: CGC-13-276217 Filing Date: Jul-30-2014 2:44 Filed by: MARJORIE MANZELLA Juke Box: 001 Image: 04570939 JURY VERDICT HAROLD KOEPKE et al VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al 001004570939 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. ow” SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 1 JUL 3 0 2044 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO cou 3 f: Gerk HAROLD KOEPKE and NANCY KARIDIS- Case No. CGC13276217 4|| KOEPKE, VERDICT FORM 5 Plaintiffs, | Judge: Hon. Richard B. Ulypr Jr. 6 Dept,: vs. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS 8 Defendants. 9 10 || We, the jury in the above entitled action, find as follows: we find: 11 1 On Harold Koepke’s negligence claim against Hertz Corporation, 12 For Mr. Koepke For Hertz Corporation we find: 13 On Harold Koepke’s concealment claim against Hertz Corporation, For Mr. Koepke For Hertz Corporation Vv 14 we find: 15 On Harold Koepke’s negligence claim against Belnortel Corporation, 16 For Mr. Koepke For Belnortel Corporation “_ / ation, we 17 On Harold Koepke’s strict liability claim against Belnortel Corpor find: 18 _|/ For Mr. Koepke For Belnortel Corporation 19 ing any of Answer this question if y« ou found for Mr. Koepke in answer the questions above. With 10 0% representing the total fault regarding the harm to 20 of the following plaintiffs, what percentage o: f that 100% was due to the fault 21 entities: 22 Hertz Corporation 23 Belnortel Corporation —_ 24 Abex Corporation 25 Arata Pontiac 26 Bendix 27 \ BMW = VERDICT FORM BorgWarner The Budd Company Budget Rent-A-Car Burlingame Auto Supply Burlingame Importers Cali-Block Chrysler/Jeep/Plymouth/ Dodge Continental Teves Inc. 10 Crosby & Gray Funeral il Home 12 Don L. Morris 13 EIS 14 Federal Auto Parts 15 16 Fiat 17 Folsom Auto Supply 18 Ford/Lincoln/Mercury 19 General Motors/Chevrolet/ 20 Cadillac/Buick/GMC/Pontiac 21 Genuine Parts/NAPA 22 Hillsborough Police 23 Department 24 HM Royal 25 Honda/Acura 26 Isuzu 27 28 Krasne 2 VERDICT FORM Kray’s Auto Parts Mercedes Mike Harvey Acura Mike Harvey Oldsmobile Mike Harvey Toyota Mitsubishi Mopar Pete Hubler 10 Putnam Buick 11 Raybestos 12 Rox Automotive 13 Saab 14 Saturn 15 16 Shen Lincoln Mercury 17 Specialty Foreign Auto Parts ee 18 Subaru 19 Suzuki 20 Thiokol 21 Toyota 22 Volkswagen 23 24 Volvo 25 Wagner 26 Harold Koepke 27 28 3 VERDICT FORM —— ke in answering any of the Answer this question if you foun: d for Mr. Koep ion any reduction of damages due questions above. Without taking into considerat to the neg ligence of Mr. Koepke, if any, what do you find to be the total amount of damages suffered by plaintiffs: Economic damages: $475,000 (stipulated) . Noneconomic damages for Mr. Koepke: $, Mrs. Koepke: _ Noneconomic damages - Loss of Consortium for $. of punitive damages? Does the conduct of Hertz Corporation justify an award Yes No 10 DATED:__} [3c yt 1 ll 12 Va ne y e Presiding Juror 7 ~ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 VERDICT FORM