Preview
UU I
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-11-2014 02:46 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-521356
Filing Date: Apr-11-2014 02:45 pm
Filed by: ANNA TORRES
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04444702
STIPULATION
NATHAN MARSHALL et al VS. DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC. et al
001004444702
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.
@ e
David M. King (Bar No. 95279)
dking@carr-mcclellan.com
CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
216 Park Road
P.O. Box 513 San Francisco County Superior Court
Burlingame, California 94011-0513
Telephone: (650) 342-9600 we 17 204
Facsimile: (650) 342-7685
K OF E,COURT
Attomeys for Defendant
Selby and Hudson Corporation BY:
Deputy Clerk
Miles B. Cooper (Bar No. 209085)
EMISON HULLVERSON LLP
1005 Sansome Street, Suite 330
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 434-2111
10 Facsimile: (415) 434-2112
1 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Nathan Marshall and Alex Marshall
12
Philip A. Segal (Bar No. 137633)
13 KERN NODA DEVINE & SEGAL
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 600
14 San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: (415) 474-1900
15
Attorneys for Defendants
16 New Desoto at Cooperative Company tes aed tshy
as-DeSoto Cab Company, Inc. and Faegh Behbahani
17
18 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
19 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
20
21 NATHAN MARSHALL and ALEX No. CGC-12-521356
MARSHALL, individually and as
22 successors in interest of decedents STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING
DENNIS T. MARSHALL and KAREN DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
23 MARSHALL, SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
24 Plaintiffs,
vs.
25
DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC,, et al.
26
27 Defendants.
28
1
Stipulation Continuing Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
@ @
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and betwcen the parties herein, through their
respective attorneys of record, that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Selby and
Hudson Corporation, currently set for hearing on May 8, 2014, shall be continued to August 12,
2014, at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302 of this Court, and further that the Opposition and Reply
Briefs shall be due pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure.
Dated: apnit Fania CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL,
THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
avid M
10 ttorn: for Defendant
and Hudson Corporation
11
12
Dated: April, 2014 EMISON HULLVERSON LLP
14
15
By:
16
Miles B. Cooper
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17
Nathan Marshall and Alex Marshall
18
19
20 Dated: April, 2014 KERN NODA DEVINE & SEGAL
21
22 By:
Philip A. Segal
23 Attorneys for Defendants
en-P
24 DeSoto Cab Company, The
and Faegh Behbahani
25
26
27 40347-00001\iManage\5090793.1
28
2
Stipulation Continuing Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
seni x “@ _ @— 2
IT 1S HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties herein, through their
respective attorneys of record, that tne Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Selby and
Hudson Corporation, currently set for hearing on May 8, 2014, shall be continued to August 12,
2014, at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302 of this Court, and further that the Opposition and Reply
Briefs shall be due pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure.
Dated: April fa CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL,
THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
a vid M. Kk
Ui
10 ttorn for Defendant
and Hudson Corporation
11
12
13 Dated: April Zz 2014 EMISON HULLVERSON LLP
14
15
wiZE Lf.
16
Miles B. Cooper
Attomeys for Plaintiffs
7
Nathan Marshall and Alex Marshall
18
19
20 Dated: April 2014 KERN NODA DEVINE & SEGAL
21
22 By
Philip A. Segal
23 Attorneys for Defendants
New Desoto Cab Cooperative Company, Inc.,
24 sued erroneously as DeSoto Cab Company, Ine.
and Faegh Behbahani
25
26
27 40347-0000 I\iManage\5090793,1
28
2
Stipulation Continuing Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
a ane ee -
QO oO
If IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties herein, through their
respective attorneys of record, that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Selby and
Hudson Corporation, currently set for hearing on May-8, 2014, shall be continued to August 12,
2014, at 9:30 a.m. in Department 302 of this Court, and further that the Opposition and Reply
Briefs shall be due pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Dated: April Fans CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL,
THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
avid M.
10 ttorn: for Defendant
il and Hudson Corporation
12
13 Dated: April » 2014 EMISON HULLVERSON LLP
14
15
B
16
‘Mike B. Cooper
17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Nathan Marshall and Alex Marshall
18
19
smb di LeL,
Dated: April g , 2014 KERN NODA DE’ V1 & SEGAL
21
22
Phitip/hSegat
| fi
23 A ttorneys for De theisass
Me i
24 Company, mc, ——F
‘oto Cab Company, Inc,
and Faegh Behbahani
25
26
27 40347-0000 1\iManage\$090793.1
28
2
Stipulation Continuing Hearing Date on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
@
PROOF OF SERVICE
I am employed by the law firm of Carr, McClellan, Ingersoll, Thompson & Horn
Professional Law Corporation in the County of San Mateo, California. I am over the age of
eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 216 Park Road.
P.O. Box 513, Burlingame, California 94011-0513.
I certify that the original papers filed with the Court and all copies of papers, documents.
and exhibits, whether filed with the Court or served on other parties, are prepared on recycled
paper.
On the date set forth below, I served the attached:
. STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
on the parties in this action, by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope
addressed as follows:
10
Miles B. Cooper, Esq.
1 Emison Hullverson LLP
1005 Sansome Street, Suite 330
12 San Francisco, CA 94111
13 PhilipA. Segal, Esq
Kern, Noda, Devine & Segal
14 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94109
15
By placing in office mail 1 enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or
16 package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed above and placed the
envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I
17 am readily familiar with this business’s practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for
18 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the
United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. Iam
19 a resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or
package was placed in the mail at Burlingame, California.
20
21 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct
Dated: April11, 2014
23
24
yh Gifford
25
26
27
28
CARR, MCCLELLAN, 26839-0002 ViManage\S 101353.1
INGERSOLL,
THOMPSON & HORN PROOF OF SERVICE
PROFSSSIONAL. LAW
ConroRarion