arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Joanne Rosendin, Esq., SBN: 121025 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 340 Oakland, California 94612 ELECTRONICALLY Telephone: (510) 286-2200 FILED Superior Court of California, Attorneys for Defendant, County of San Francisco CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, OCT 19 2010 an Illinois corporation Clerk of the Court BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 CHARLES HUSBAND, NO. CGC-09-275098 i Plaintiff, OBJECTION TO ASSIGNMENT TO 12 COMMISSIONER FOR TRIAL Vv. 13 ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), et al, 14 Defendants. 1S 16 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 17 Please take notice that pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(c) defendant CHICAGO BRIDGE & 18 IRON COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, hereby timely objects and refuses to stipulate that any 19 trial or non-discovery matter in this case be heard and/or decided by a Commissioner. 20 DATED: October 19, 2010 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP 21 22 By Wis oanne osendin 23 torneys for Defendant ICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, 24 inois corporation 25 26 27 28 GAASBARUSBAND, Charles D. - CBINPLD - OJ TO ASSIGNMENT OF COMMISSIONER - CBLwpd -i- OBJECTION TO ASSIGNMENT TO COMMISSIONER FOR TRIAL